Mixed models for the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns

Biostatistics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 633-648

  Bell, Melanie L ^a   Grunwald, Gary K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Berman Turner device; Generalized linear mixed models; Maximum pseudolikelihood; Pairwise interaction; Strauss process

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 16644401754     PISSN: 14654644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh014     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BADDELEY, A. J. AND VAN LIESHOUT, M. N. M. (1995). Area-interaction point processes. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 47, 601-619.
2. BADDELEY, A. J. AND TURNER, R. (2000). Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns (with discussion). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 42, 283-322.
3. BADDELEY, A. J., MOYEED, R. A., HOWARD, C. V. AND BOYDE, A. (1993). Analysis of a three-dimensional point pattern with replication. Applied Statistics 42, 641-668.
4. BERMAN, M. AND TURNER, T. R. (1992). Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Applied Statistics 41, 31-38.
5. BESAG, J. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Statistician 24, 179-195.
6. BESAG, J. (1977). Some methods of statistical analysis for spatial data. Bulletin of International Statistical Institution 47, 77-92.
7. BRESLOW, N. E. AND CLAYTON, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 9-25.
8. BROWN, H. AND PRESCOTT, R. (1999). Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Chichester: Wiley.
9. CNAAN, A., LAIRD, N. M. AND SLASOR, P. (1997). Using the general linear mixed model to analyze unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 16, 2349-2380.
10. DALEY, D. J. AND VERE-JONES, D. (1988). Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. New York: Springer.
11. DIGGLE, P. J. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. New York: Academic.
12. DIGGLE, P. J., LANGE, N. AND BENES, F. (1991). Analysis of variance for replicated spatial point patterns in clinical neuroanatomy. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 618-625.
13. DIGGLE, P. J., FIKSEL, T., GRADARNIK, Y., OGATA, Y., STOYAN, D. AND TANEMURA, M. (1994). On parameter estimation for pairwise interaction point processes. International Statistical Review 62, 99-117.
14. DIGGLE, P. J., MATEAU, J. AND CLOUGH, H. E. (2000). A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns. Advances in Applied Probability 32, 331-343.
15. HEALY, M. J. R. (2001). Multilevel data and their analysis. In Leyland, A. H. and Goldstein, H. (eds), Multilevel modeling of health statistics, Chichester: Wiley.
16. KELLY, F. P. AND RIPLEY, B. D. (1976). On Strauss' model for clustering. Biometrika 63, 357-360.
17. KONIG, D., CARAVAL-GONZALES, S., DOWNS, A. M., VASSY, J. AND RIGAUT, J. P. (1991). Modeling and analysis of 3-D arrangements of particles by point process with examples of application to biological data obtained by confocal scanning light microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 161, 405-433.
18. LITTELL, R., MILLIKEN, G., STROUP, W. AND WOLFINGER, R. (1996). SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
19. MATEAU, J. (2001). Parametric procedures in the analysis of replicated pairwise interaction point patterns. Biometrical Journal 43, 375-394.
20. OGATA, Y. AND TANEMURA, M. (1981). Estimation of interaction potentials of spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood procedure. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 33, 315-338.
21. OGATA, Y. AND TANEMURA, M. (1984). Likelihood analysis of spatial point patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 46, 496-518.
22. PAPANGELOU, F. (1974). The conditional intensity of general point processes and related random change of scale. Zeitschrift fur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 41, 207-226.
23. RENSHAW, E. AND SÄRKKÄ, A. (2001). Gibbs point processes for studying the development of spatial-temporal stochastic processes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 36, 85-105.
24. RIPLEY, B. D. (1977). Modeling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39, 172-192.
25. RIPLEY, B. D. (1979). Simulating spatial patterns: dependent samples from a multivariate density. Applied Statistics 28, 109-112.
26. RIPLEY, B. D. (1981). Spatial Statistics. New York: Wiley.
27. RIPLEY, B. D. (1988). Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. SÄRKKÄ, A. (1993). Pseudo-likelihood approach for pair potential estimation of Gibbs processes. Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä.
29. SAS INSTITUTE (1999). SAS/STAT V8 Software User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
30. SELF, S. G. AND LIANG, K. Y. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 605-610.
31. STANICK, E. J., WELL, A. AND OCKENE, I. (1999). Why not routinely use best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) as estimates of cholesterol, percent fat from kcal, and physical activity? Statistics in Medicine 18, 2943-2959.
32. STRAUSS, D. J. (1975). A model for clustering. Biometrika 62, 467-475.
33. VENABLES, W. N. AND RIPLEY, B. D. (1997). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
34. VERBEKE, G. AND MOLENBERGHS, G. (2000). Linear Mixed Models For Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer.
35. WOLFINGER, R. AND O'CONNELL, M. (1993). Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 48, 233-243.