Signals for CPT and Lorentz violation in neutral-meson oscillations

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2000, Pages

  Kostelecký, V Alan ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16644384336     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.016002     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. See, for example, T. D. Lee and C. S. Wu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 16, 511 (1966).
2. E773 Collaboration, B. Schwingenheuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4376 (1995)
3. see also E731 Collaboration, L. K. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6625 (1997)
4. R. Carosi, Phys. Lett. B 237, 303 (1990).
5. CPLEAR Collaboration, P. Kokkas, presented at the Conference on High Energy Physics, Vancouver, 1998;P. Bloch, presented at the KAON 99 Conference, Chicago, 1999.
6. J. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4083 (1997).
7. P. Franzini, in Phenomenology of Unification from Present to Future, edited by G. Diambrini-Palazzi, C. Cosmelli, and L. Zanello (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)
8. P. Franzini and J. Lee-Franzini, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 71, 478 (1999).
9. See, for example, C. Bhat et al., Report FERMILAB-P-0894 (1998).
10. OPAL Collaboration, R. Ackerstaff, Z. Phys. C 76, 401 (1997).
11. DELPHI Collaboration, M. Feindt et al., Report DELPHI 97-98 CONF 80 (1997).
12. A number of recent theoretical efforts along these lines are discussed in CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, edited by V. A. Kostelecký (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
13. A discussion of the discrete symmetries C, P, T, and their combinations can be found in R. G. Sachs, The Physics of Time Reversal (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).
14. CP Violation, edited by C. Jarlskog (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
15. For a review, see B. Winstein and L. Wolfenstein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1113 (1993).
16. V. A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224 (1989)
17. Phys. Rev. Lett.V. A. KosteleckýS. Samuel66, 1811 (1991)
18. V. A. KosteleckýS. SamuelPhys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989)
19. Phys. Rev. DV. A. KosteleckýS. Samuel40, 1886 (1989)
20. V. A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, Nucl. Phys. B359, 545 (1991)
21. V. A. KosteleckýR. PottingPhys. Lett. B 381, 89 (1996).
22. V. A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3923 (1995).
23. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997)
24. Phys. Rev. DD. ColladayV. A. Kostelecký58, 116002 (1998).
25. V. A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, in Gamma Ray-Neutrino Cosmology and Planck Scale Physics, edited by D. B. Cline (World Scientific
26. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Lett. B 344, 259 (1995)
27. D. ColladayV. A. KosteleckýPhys. Rev. D 52, 6224 (1995)
28. Phys. Rev. DV. A. Kostelecký and R. Van Kooten, 54, 5585 (1996).
29. V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1818 (1998).
30. P. B. Schwinberg, R. S. Van Dyck, Jr., and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Lett. 81A, 119 (1981)
31. R. Van Dyck, Jr., P. Schwinberg, and H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. D 34, 722 (1986)
32. L. S. Brown and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986)
33. R. S. Van Dyck, Jr., P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987)
34. Phys. Rev. Lett.G. Gabrielse, 74, 3544 (1995).
35. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1432 (1997)
36. R. BluhmV. A. KosteleckýN. RussellPhys. Rev. D 57, 3932 (1998).
37. Gabrielse et al. 9
38. G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198 (1999).
39. H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published), hep-ph/9906262.
40. Mittleman, Ioannou, and Dehmelt 9
41. R. Mittleman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2116 (1999).
42. S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990).
43. R. Jackiw and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999).
44. M. Pérez-Victoria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2518 (1999)
45. J. M. Chung, Phys. Lett. B 461, 138 (1999).
46. M. Charlton, Phys. Rep. 241, 65 (1994)
47. Antihydrogen, edited by J. Eades (Baltzer, Geneva, 1993).
48. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2254 (1999).
49. V. W. Hughes, H. G. Robinson, and V. Beltran-Lopez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 342 (1960)
50. R. W. P. Drever, Philos. Mag. 6, 683 (1961)
51. J. D. Prestage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2387 (1985)
52. Phys. Rev. Lett.S. K. Lamoreaux, 57, 3125 (1986)
53. S. K. LamoreauxPhys. Rev. A 39, 1082 (1989)
54. T. E. Chupp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1541 (1989)
55. Phys. Rev. Lett.C. J. Berglund, 75, 1879 (1995).
56. V. A. Kostelecký and C. D. Lane, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999)
57. V. A. KosteleckýC. D. LaneJ. Math. Phys. (to be published), hep-ph/9909542.
58. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecký, and C. D. Lane, Indiana University
59. S. Coleman and S. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 59, 116008 (1999).
60. O. Bertolami, Phys. Lett. B 395, 178 (1997).
61. It has been suggested that in the kaon system CPT-violating effects might be generated through an unconventional quantum mechanics in which the Schrödinger equation is replaced with a density-matrix formalism. See J. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3846 (1996), where it is also shown that the resulting effects can be disentangled from the CPT-violating parameter (Formula presented) of interest here.
62. Direct CPT violation in the decay amplitudes is neglected here because it is suppressed in the standard-model extension and is expected to be unobservable 14.
63. A field redefinition can be used to shift equally the values of all the parameters (Formula presented) without physical consequences 15. For a particular (Formula presented) meson, one could therefore replace (Formula presented) with a single (Formula presented) factor. For clarity, this redefinition is avoided in the present work.
64. Particle Data Group, C. Caso, Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
65. Some authors have suggested a relatively large momentum dependence for T violation: J. S. Bell and J. K. Perring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 348 (1964)
66. S. H. Aronson, Phys. Rev. D 28, 495 (1983).
67. R. M. Green, Spherical Astronomy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985).
68. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 380 (1964).
69. V. V. Barmin, Nucl. Phys. B247, 293 (1984).
70. N. W. Tanner and R. H. Dalitz, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 171, 463 (1986).
71. KTeV Collaboration, A. Alavi-Harati et al., Report EFI 99-25 (1999)
72. see also NA31 Collaboration, G. D. Barr, Phys. Lett. B 317, 233 (1993)
73. E731 Collaboration, L. K. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1203 (1993).
74. See, for example, C. D. Buchanan, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4088 (1992).
75. A careful analysis involving the use of the magnitude and phase of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) can yield a CPT test, but it is necessary to account for contributions to the effective Hamiltonian arising from 3π decays and from violations of the (Formula presented) rule in semileptonic decays. See L. Lavoura, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7, 1367 (1992).
76. H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. 176, 1715 (1968).
77. I. Dunietz, J. Hauser, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2166 (1987).
78. M. Hayakawa and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1150 (1993).
79. KTeV Collaboration, presented by Y. B. Hsiung at the KAON 99 Conference, Chicago, 1999.