3D graphical models for vascular-stent pose simulation

Machine Graphics and Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 235-248

  Flórez Valencia, Leonardo ^a,b,c   Montagnat, Johan ^d   Orkisz, Maciej ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

Author keywords

3D image; Deformable model; Simplex mesh; Simulation; Stenosis; Stent; Vascular pathology

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASES; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATHOLOGY;

3D IMAGE; DEFORMABLE MODEL; SIMPLEX MESH; STENOSIS; STENT; VASCULAR PATHOLOGY;

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM;

EID: 16644371973     PISSN: 12300535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1990 Bloomenthal J., Wyvill B. : Interactive techniques for implicit modeling. Computer Graphics, 24(2), 109-116.
2. 1995 Douek P. C., Revel D., Chazel S., Falise B., Villard J., Amiel M. : Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. American Journal of Radiology, (165), 431-437.
3. 1996 McInerney T., Terzopoulos D.: Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Medical Image Analysis, 1(2), 91-108. TORONTO-004.
4. 1997 Montagnat J., Delingette H. : A Hybrid Framework for Surface Registration and Deformable Models. Proc. of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1041-1046, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
5. 1998 Abdoulaev G., Cadeddu S., Delussu G., Donizelli M., Fromaggia L., Gianchetti A., Gobbetti E., Leone A., Manzi C., Pili P., Scheinine A., Tuveri M., Varone A., Veneziani A., Zanetti G., Zorcolo A. : ViVa: The Virtual Vascular project. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 22(4).
6. Hoogeveen R., Bakker C., Viergever, M. : Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR Angiography. Journal on Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 8(6), 1228-1235.
7. Montagnat J., Delingette H. : Globally constrained deformable models for 3D object reconstruction. Signal Processing, 71(2), 173-186.
8. 1999 Delingette H. : General Object Reconstruction based on Simplex Meshes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 32(2), 111-146.
9. Stern C., Wildermuth S., Weissmann J., Stucki P., Hilflker P., Debatin J. F.: Predictive medicine: Computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. In Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), pp. 176-180, Paris, France.
10. Taylor C., Draney M., Ku J., Parker D., Steele B., Wang K., Zarins C. : Predictive medicine: Computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Computer Aided Surgery, (4), 231-247.
11. Wang K., Dutton R., Taylor C. : Improving geometric model construction for blood flow modeling. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 18(6), 33-39.
12. 2000 Dumoulin C., Cochelin B. : Mechanical behaviour modelling of balloon-expandable stents. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, 1461-1470.
13. Hernández-Hoyos M., Anwander A., Orkisz M., Roux J. P., Douek P. C., Magnin I. E. : A Deformable Vessel Model with Single Point Initialization for Segmentation, Quantification and Visualization of Blood Vessels in 3D MRA. In Medical Image Computer and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 735-745, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
14. Wentzel J., Whelan D., Van Der Giessen W., Van Beusekom H., Andhyiswara I., Serruys P., Slager C., Krams R. : Coronary stent implantation changes 3D vessel geometry and 3D shear stress distribution. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, 1287-1295.
15. Zorcolo A., Gobbetti E., Zanetti G., Tuveri M.: A Volumetric Virtual Environment for Catheter Insertion Simulation. In Eurograhics Workshop on Virtual Environments (EGVE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16. 2001 Cebral J. R., Lohner R., Soto O., Choyke P. L., Yim P. J. : Patient-Specific Simulation of Carotid Artery Stenting Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. In Medical Image Computer and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 153-160, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
17. Montagnat J., Delingette H., Ayache N. : A review of deformable surfaces: topology, geometry and deformation. Image and Vision Computing, 19(14), 1023-1040.
18. Pham Q. C., Vincent P., Clarysse P., Croisille P., Magnin I. E. : A FEM-based deformable model for the 3D segmentation and tracking of the heart in cardiac MRI. In International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, pp. 250-254, Pula, Croatia.
19. Wilson N., Wang K., Dutton R. W, Taylor C. : A Software Framework for Creating Patient Specific Geometric Models from Medical Imaging Data for Simulation Based Medical Planning of Vascular Surgery. In Medical Image Computer and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 449-456, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
20. Yim P. J., Cebral J. R., Mullick R., Marcos H. B., Choyke P. L.: Vessel Surface Reconstruction With a Tubular Deformable Model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20(10),1411-1421.
21. 2002 Hernández-Hoyos M. : Segmentation anisotrope 3D pour la quantification en imagerie vasculaire par resonance magnétique. PhD thesis, INSA de Lyon, France.
22. Hernández-Hoyos M., Orkisz M., Puech P., Mansard C., Douek P. C., Magnin I. E. : Computer-assisted analysis of three-dimensional angiograms. RadioGraphics, 22, 421-436.