An assistive-technology intervention for verbose speech after traumatic brain injury

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 366-377

  Kirsch, Ned L ^a   Shenton, Michelle ^a   Spirl, Erin ^a   Simpson, Rich ^b   LoPresti, Edmund ^c   Schreckenghost, Debra ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c AT Sciences   (United States)

^d Metrica Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Cognition disorders; Handheld computers; Internet; Rehabilitation; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CASE REPORT; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPUTER; DEVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MALE; SLEEP DISORDER; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN INJURY; MICROCOMPUTER; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; CUES; HUMANS; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 16544395158     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200409000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspective on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:191-209.
2. Hart T, Hawkey K, Whyte J. Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a within-subjects trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:556-570.
3. Cole E. Cognitive prosthetics: an overview to two methods of treatment. NeuroRehabilitation. 1999;12:39-51.
4. Kirsch NL, Shenton M, Spirl E, et al. Web-based assistive technology interventions for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: a selective review and two cases studies. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(3):200-212.
5. Bergman MM. The benefits of a cognitive orthotic in brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:432-445.
6. LoPresti EF, Mihailidis A, Kirsch NL. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(1/2):5-39.
7. Flannery M, Rice D. Using Available Technology for Reminding. Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (RESNA). Pittsburgh, Pa. 1997;517-519.
8. Levinson R. The planning and execution assistant and trainer (PEAT). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12:85-91.
9. Bergman MM. Successful mastery with a cognitive orthotic in people with traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(2):76-82.
10. Cole E, Dehdashti P. Interface design as a prosthesis for an individual with a brain injury. SIGCHI Bull. 1990;22:28-32.
11. Cole E, Dehdashti P, Petti L, Angert M. Design and outcomes of computer-based cognitive prosthetics for brain injury: a field study of three subjects. NeuroRehabilitation. 1994;4:174-186.
12. Kime S, Lamb D, Wilson BA. Use of a comprehensive program of external cueing to enhance procedural memory in a patient with dense amnesia. Brain Inj. 1995;10:17-25.
13. Goldstein G, Beers SR, Shemanksy WJ, Longmore S. An assistive device for persons with severe amnesia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35:238-244.
14. Glisky EB. Computer-assisted instruction for patients with traumatic brain injury: teaching of domain-specific knowledge. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1992;7:1-12.
15. Glisky E, Delaney S. Implicit memory and new semantic learning in post-traumatic amnesia. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:31-42.
16. Crosson B, Barco P, Velozo C, et al. Awareness and compensation in post-acute head injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;4:46-54.
17. Tang P, Venables T. "Smart" homes and telecare for independent living. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:8-14.
18. Cooper M, Keating D. Implications of the emerging home systems technologies for rehabilitation. Med Eng Phys. 1996;18:176-180.
19. Rialle V, Duchene F, Noury N, Bajolle L, Demongeot J. Health "smart" home: information technology for patients at home. Telemed J e-Health. 2002;8:395-409.
20. Hersh NA, Treadgold LG. NeuroPage: the rehabilitation of memory dysfunction by prosthetic memory and cueing. NeuroRehabilitation. 1994;4:187-197.
21. Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Malinek V. Evaluation of NeuroPage©: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63:113-115.
22. Evans JJ, Emslie H, Wilson BA. External cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:399-408.
23. Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, Evans JJ. George: learning to live independently with NeuroPage®. Rehabil Psychol. 2002;44:284-296.
24. Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(4):477-482.
25. Kim H, Burke D, Dowds M, George J. Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1999;13:147-150.
26. Van Den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Inj. 2000;14:455-462.
27. Mihailidis A, Fernie GR, Cleghorn WL. The development of a computerized cueing device to help people with dementia be more independent. Technol Disabil. 2000;12:23-40.
28. Flannery MA, Butterbaugh GJ, Rice DA, Rice JC. Reminding technology for prospective memory disability: a case study. Pediatr Rehabil. 1997;1:239-244.
29. Kirsch NL, Levine SP, Fallon-Krueger M, Jaros L. The microcomputer as an "orthotic" device for patients with cognitive deficits. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1987;2:77-86.
30. Kirsch NL, Levine SP, Lajiness R, Mossaro M, Schneider M. Computer-assisted interactive task guidance: facilitating the performance of a simulated vocational task. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1992;7:13-25.
31. LoPresti EF, Friedman MB, Hages D. Electronic Vocational Aid for People With Cognitive Disabilities: Proceedings of the RESNA 1997 Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, Pa. 1997:514-516.
32. Carmien S. MAPS: Memory Aiding Prompting System. Available at: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~13d/clever/assets/doc/sc-010412-project-report.doc. Accessed March 8, 2003.
33. Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, et al. Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;15:787-800.
34. Brown-Triolo D. Understanding the person behind the technology. In: Scherer MJ, ed. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001:31-46.
35. Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;18:439-448.
36. Louise-Bender Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:5-20.
37. Ossorio PG. Essays on Clinical Topics: The Collected Works of Peter G. Vol 2. Ann Arbor, Mich: Descriptive Psychology Press; 1997:168-170.
38. Kittel A, Di Marco MA, Stewart H. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:106-114.
39. Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36-45.
40. Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual: Revised and Expanded Edition. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
41. Heaton RK, Grant I, Matthews CG. Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery. Demographic Corrections, Research Findings, and Clinical Applications. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources: 1991.
42. Heaton RK, Avitable N, Grant I, Matthews CG. Further cross validation of regression-based neuropsychological norms with an update for the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21(4):571-582.
43. Fastenau PS. Validity of regression-based norms: an empirical test of the comprehensive norms with older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(6):906-916.
44. Wilton, P. Beginning Javascript. Birmingham, England: Wrox Press; 2000.
45. Homer A, Ullman C, Wright S. Instant HTML. 2nd ed. Birmingham, England: Wrox Press; 1997.
46. Forta B, Weiss N. Macromedia Coldfusion Web Application Construction Kit. 5th ed. Berkeley, Calif: Macromedia Press; 2003.
47. Maguire M. Methods to support human-centered design. Int J Hum Comp Stud. 2001;55:587-634.
48. Shone SM, Ryan S, Rigby PJ, Jutai JW. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:115-125.
49. Buhler C. Empowered participation of users with disabilities in R&D projects. Int J Hum Comp Stud. 2001;55:645-659.
50. White GW. Consumer participation in disability research: the golden rule as a guide for ethical practice. Rehabil Psychol. 2002;47:438-446.
51. Ricker JH, Rosenthal M, Garay E, et al. Telerehabilitation needs: a survey of persons with acquired brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;17(3):242-250.