A new species of Haplophyllum A. Juss. (Rutaceae) from the Iberian Peninsula: Evidence from morphological, karyological and molecular analyses

Annals of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 571-582

  Navarro, F B ^a   Suarez Santiago V N ^a   Blanca, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cytogenetic analysis; Haplophyllum; Iberian Peninsula; ITS sequences; Morphology; Phylogenetic analysis; Rutaceae; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

NEW SPECIES;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; IBERIAN PENINSULA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; WORLD;

HAPLOPHYLLUM; HAPLOPHYLLUM LINIFOLIUM; RUTACEAE;

PLANT DNA; SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; FRUIT; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT SEED; PLANT STEM; PLOIDY; RUTACEAE; SPAIN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BASE SEQUENCE; DNA, INTERGENIC; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; FRUIT; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS; PLOIDIES; RUTACEAE; SEEDS; SPAIN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 16544388022     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch176     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). The American Naturalist 152: 767-791.
2. Baldwin BG. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
3. Baldwin BG. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of Calycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evolution re-examined. American Journal of Botany 80: 222-238.
4. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell ChS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on Angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
5. Becerra JX. 2003. Evolution of Mexican Bursera (Burseraceae) inferred from ITS, ETS, and 5S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 300-309.
6. Becerra JX, Venable L. 1999. Nuclear ribosomal DNA phylogeny and its implications for evolutionary trends in Mexican Bursera (Burseraceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1047-1057.
7. Blanca G. 1981. Origen, evolución y endemismo en la sección Willkommia G. Blanca (Gén. Centaurea L.). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 37: 607-618.
8. Bolòs O, Vigo J. 1974. Notes sobre taxonomia i nomenclatura de plantes. I. Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d'Història Natural 38 (Sec. Bot. 1): 61-89.
9. Bocquet G, Widler B, Kiefer H. 1978. The Messinian model - A new outlook for the floristics and systematics of the Mediterranean area. Candollea 33: 269-287.
10. Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ, Baldwin BG, Wojciechowski MF. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae): evidence from sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA and its congruence with morphology. American Journal of Botany 82: 903-918.
11. Cappelletti C. 1929. Embriogenesi di Ruta patavina L. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano 36(1): 138.
12. Darlington CD, La Cour LF. 1969. The handling of chromosomes. London: Allen & Unwin.
13. Don G. 1831-1834. A general history of the dichlamydeous plants. 4 vols. London: JG & F Rivington et al.
14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JD. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
15. Downie SR, Katz-Downie DS. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 234-251.
16. Edwards KJ, Gadek PA. 2001. Evolution and biogeography of Alectryon (Sapindaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 14-26.
17. Engler A. 1896. Rutaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 3(4): 95-201. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
18. Farris JS. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
19. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Systematic Zoology 38: 406-407.
20. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
21. Font Quer P. 1953. Diccionario de botánica. Barcelona: Ed. Labor.
22. Ghaffari SM. 1986. In: IOPB chromosome number reports 91. Taxon 35: 407.
23. Ghaffari SM. 1987. Chromosome counts of some angiosperms from Iran. II. Iran Journal of Botany Research 3: 183-188.
24. Guerra MdosS. 1984. New chromosome numbers in Rutaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 146: 13-30.
25. Guerra MdosS. 1985. Cytogenetics of Rutaceae. III. Heterochromatin patterns. Caryologia 38: 335-346.
26. Hanelt P. 1973. In: IOPB chromosome number reports 42. Taxon 22: 647-654.
27. Heywood VH. 1978. Flowering plants of the world. London: Oxford University Press.
28. Hillis DM, Huelsenbeck JP. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
29. Jeanmonod D, Bocquet G. 1981. Remarques sur la distribution de Silene mollissima (L.) Pers. et des espèces affines en Méditerrané e occidentale. Candollea 36: 279-287.
30. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
31. Kluge AG, Farris JS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
32. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jokobsen IB, Nei M. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Temple: Arizona State University.
33. Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Systematic Biology 49: 628-651.
34. Mabberley DJ. 1990. The plant-book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Mesicek J, Sojak J. 1972. Chromosome studies in Mongolian plants. Preslia 44: 334-358.
36. Nazrullaev SS, Bessonova IA, Akhmedkhodzhaeva KS. 2002. Estrogenic activity as a function of the chemical structure in Haplophyllum quinoline alkaloids. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 37: 551-555.
37. Negodi G. 1939. Cariologia delle Rutaceae e delle Zygophyllaceae. Scientia Genetica 1: 168-185.
38. Pascual-Villalobos MJ, Robledo A. 1999. Anti-insect activity of plant extracts from the wild flora in southeastern Spain. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 27: 1-10.
39. Prieto JM, Giner RM, Recio MC, Schinella G, Manez S, Ríos JL. 2002. Diphyllin acetylapioside, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor from Haplophyllum hispanicum. Planta Medica 68: 359-360.
40. Rivas-Martínez S, Asensi A, Díez-Garretas B, Molero J, Valle F. 1997. Biogeographical synthesis of Andalusia (southern Spain). Journal of Biogeography 24: 915-928.
41. Rivas-Martínez S, Loidi J. 1999. Bioclimatology of the Iberian Peninsula. Itinera Geobotanica 13: 41-47.
42. Rosúa JL, Blanca G. 1988. Revisión del género Salvia L. sect. Aethiopis Benth. (Lamiaceae) en el Mediterráneo occidental. Collectanea Botanica (Barcelona) 17(2): 205-236.
43. Schinella GR, Tournier HA, Prieto JM, Ríos JL, Buschiazzo H, Zaidenberg A. 2002. Inhibition of Trypanosoma cruzi growth by medical plant extracts. Fitoterapia 73: 569-575.
44. Scott KD, McIntyre CL, Playford J. 2000. Molecular analyses suggest a need for a significant rearrangement of Rutaceae sub-families and a minor reassessment of species relationships within Flindersia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 15-27.
45. Shaiq M, Kashif M, Saleem M, Bakhsh R. 2001. Haplophytin-A and B: the alkaloidal constituents of Haplophyllum acutifolium. Phytochemistry 57: 1277-1280.
46. Spach E. 1949. Conspectus generis Haplophyllum. Annales des Sciencies Naturelles, Botanique III 11: 174-192.
47. Stearn WT. 1980. Botanical Latin. London: David & Charles.
48. Suh Y, Heo K, Park ChW. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of maples (Acer L.; Aceraceae) implied by nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Journal of Plant Research 113: 193-202.
49. Swofford DL. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey.
50. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
51. Thornill JW, Matta RK, Wood WH. 1965. Examining three dimensional microstructures with the scanning electron microscope. Grana Palynologica 6: 3-6.
52. Townsend CC. 1966. Towards a revision of Haplophyllum A. Juss. (Rutaceae): 1. Kew Bulletin 20: 89-102.
53. Townsend CC. 1968. Haplophyllum. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227-229.
54. Townsend CC. 1975. Towards a revision of Haplophyllum A. Juss. (Rutaceae): 3. Kew Bulletin 30: 527-530.
55. Townsend CC. 1986. Taxonomic revision of the genus Haplophyllum (Rutaceae). Hooker's Icones Plantarum, Vol. XL, parts I, II and III. Kent: Bentham-Moxon Trustees.
56. UICN. 2001. Categorías y criterios de la Lista Roja de la UICN: Versión 3.1. Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies de la UICN: Gland.
57. Valle F. 2003. Mapa de series de vegetación de Andalucía. Madrid: Ed. Rueda.
58. Vvdensky A. 1949. Haplophyllum. In: Komarov VL, ed. Flora of the U.R.S.S., Vol. 14. Leningrad: Ed. Academiae Scientiarum URSS, 200-227.
59. Wen J, Zimmer EA. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 167-177.
60. Wendel JF. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249.
61. Zakironova RO, Nafanailova II. 1992. Chromosome numbers in members of some families of the Kazakhstan flora. Botaniceskii Zcurnal 77: 71-72.