Effects of dental implant length and bone quality on biomechanical responses in bone around implants: A 3-D non-linear finite element analysis

Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 44-49

  Lin, Chun Li ^a   Kuo, Yu Chan ^a   Lin, Ting Sheng ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone density; Contact; Dental implant; Finite element analysis

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROSTHESES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STRAIN; STRUCTURAL LOADS; TITANIUM;

ALVEOLAR BONES; CONTACT ELEMENTS; CORTICAL BONES; OCCLUSAL FORCES;

BIOMECHANICS;

TITANIUM;

ALVEOLAR BONE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CANCELLOUS BONE; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; MECHANICAL STRESS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SIMULATION; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 16444371384     PISSN: 10162372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4015/S1016237205000081     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported proethses-a review. J Dent 2002; 30: 271-282.
2. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamurs E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 357-368.
3. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointergrated implant. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 329-336.
4. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 59-63.
5. Block MS, Gardiner D, Kent JN, Misiek DJ, finger IM, Guerra L. Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 626-633.
6. Isidor F. Loss of osseointergrated caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 143-152.
7. Albrektsson T, Johansson CB, Sennerby L. Biological aspects of implant dentistry: Osseointergration. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4:58-73.
8. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:457-465.
9. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantology, 1997; 23: 104-111.
10. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Alnrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointergration in clinical dentistry. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Publishing, 199-209.
11. Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH. Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomechanics 1993; 26: 111-119.
12. Lin CL, Chang CH, Cheng CS, Wang CH, Lee HE. Automated finite element mesh generation for maxillary second premolar. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1999; 59: 187-195.
13. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial Analysis of An MOD Restored Human Premolar Using Auto-Mesh Finite Element Approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 576-585.
14. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effect of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 421-427.
15. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?. J Dent Res 1997; 6: 1298-1307.
16. Lin CL, Wang JC. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 331-340.
17. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15; 519-526.
18. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K, Cehreli MC, Sahin S. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 258-265.
19. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 345-360.
20. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Bosman F, Steen WHA. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 147-157.
21. Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa y, Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. 1998; 25: 299-303.