A distinct patterning mechanism of O and P cell fates in the development of the rostral segments of the leech Helobdella robusta: Implications for the evolutionary dissociation of developmental pathway and morphological outcome

Development

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 105-115

  Kuo, Dian Han ^a   Shankland, Marty ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell interaction; Cell lineage; Helobdella robusta; Leech; Rostral segment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLAST CELL; CELL CLONE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL SPECIFICITY; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; HELOBDELLA ROBUSTA; LEECH; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CELL DIVISION; CELL SURVIVAL; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; LEECHES; MORPHOGENESIS; NERVOUS SYSTEM; STEM CELLS;

ANIMALIA; HELOBDELLA ROBUSTA; HIRUDINIDA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 1642555603     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.00919     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, D. T. (1973). Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Oxford: Pergamon.
2. Arai, A., Nakamoto, A. and Shimizu, T. (2001). Specification of ectodermal teloblast lineages in embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: involvement of novel cell-cell interactions. Development 128, 1211-1219.
3. Bissen, S. T. and Weisblat, D. A. (1989). The durations and compositions of cell cycles in embryos of the leech, Helobdella triserialis. Development 106, 105-118.
4. Dohle, W. and Scholtz, G. (1988). Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: the discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development Suppl. 104, 147-160.
5. Eizinger, A., Jungblut, B. and Sommer, R. J. (1999). Evolutionary change in the functional specificity of genes. Trends Genet. 15, 197-202.
6. Gallitano-Mendel, A. and Finkelstein, R. (1997). Novel segment polarity gene interactions during embryonic head development in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 192, 599-613.
7. Goldstein, B. (1992). Induction of gut in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nature 357, 255-257.
8. Goto, A., Kitamura, K., Arai, A. and Shimizu, T. (1999). Cell fate analysis of teloblasts in the Tubifex embryo by intercellular injection of HRP. Dev. Growth Diff. 41, 703-713.
9. Ho, R. K. and Weisblat, D. A. (1987). A provisional epithelium in the leech embryo: cellular origins and influence on a developmental equivalence group. Dev. Biol. 120, 520-534.
10. Huang, F. Z. and Weisblat, D. A. (1996). Cell fate determination in an annelid equivalence group. Development 122, 1839-1847.
11. Kirschner, M. and Gerhart, J. (1998). Evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8420-8427.
12. Kramer, A. P. and Weisblat, D. A. (1985). Developmental neural kinship groups in the leech. J. Neurosci. 5, 388-407.
13. Mann, R. S. and Carroll, S. B. (2002). Molecular mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 592-600.
14. Martindale, M. Q. and Shankland, M. (1988). Developmental origin of segmental differences in the leech ectoderm: survival and differentiation of the distal tubule cell is determined by the host segment. Dev. Biol. 125, 290-300.
15. Martinez-Arias, A. (1993). Development and patterning of the larval epidermis of Drosophila. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (ed. M. Bate and A. Martinez-Arias), pp. 517-603. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
16. Patel, N. H. (1994). The evolution of arthropod segmentation: insights from comparisons of gene expression patterns. Development Suppl. 210-207.
17. Ramirez-Weber, F.-A. and Kornberg, T. B. (1999). Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 97, 599-607.
18. Rempel, J. G. (1975). The evolution of insect head: the endless disputes. Questiones Entomol. 11, 7-25.
19. Sandig, M. and Dohle, W. (1988). The cleavage pattern in the leech Theromyzon tessulatum. J. Morph. 196, 217-252.
20. Schultz, G., Patel, N. H. and Dohle, W. (1994). Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida). Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 471-478.
21. Seaver, E. C. and Shankland, M. (2000). Leech segmental repeats develop normally in the absence of signals from either anterior or posterior segments. Dev. Biol. 224, 339-353.
22. Seaver, E. C. and Shankland, M. (2001). Establishment of segment polarity in the ectoderm of the leech Helobdella. Development 128, 1629-1641.
23. Shain, D. H., Stuart, D. K., Huang, F. Z. and Weisblat, D. A. (2000). Segmentation of the central nervous system in the leech. Development 127, 735-744.
24. Shankland, M. (1984). Positional determination of supernumerary blast cell death in the leech embryo. Nature 307, 541-543.
25. Shankland, M. (1987a). Differentiation of the O and P cell lines in the embryo of the leech. I. Sequential commitment of blast cell sublineages. Dev. Biol. 123, 85-96.
26. Shankland, M. (1987b). Differentiation of the O and P cell lines in the embryo of the leech. II. Genealogical relationship of descendant pattern elements in alternative developmental pathways. Dev. Biol. 123, 97-107.
27. Shankland, M. (1987c). Cell lineage in leech embryogenesis. Trends Genet. 3, 314-319.
28. Shankland, M. and Savage, R. M. (1997). Annelids, the segmented worms. In Embryology: Constructing the Organism (ed. S. F. Gilbert and A. M. Raunio), pp. 219-235. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
29. Shankland, M. and Weisblat, D. A. (1984). Stepwise commitment of blast cell fates during the positional specification of the O and P cell lines in the leech embryo. Dev. Biol. 106, 326-342.
30. Sommer, R. (1997). Evolutionary changes of developmental mechanisms in the absence of cell lineage alternations during vulva formation in the Diplogastridae (Nematoda). Development 124, 243-251.
31. Stent, G. S., Kristan, W. B., Jr, Torrence, S. A., French, K. A. and Weisblat, D. A. (1992). Development of the leech nervous system. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 33, 109-193.
32. True, J. R. and Haag, E. S. (2001). Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Dev. 3, 109-119.
33. von Dassow, G. and Munro, E. (1999). Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 285, 307-325.
34. Wagner, G. P. and Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptation and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50, 967-976.
35. Weisblat, D. A. and Blair, S. S. (1984). Developmental interdeterminacy in embryos of the leech Helobdella triserialis. Dev. Biol. 101, 326-335.
36. Wray, G. A. and Abouheif, E. (1998). When is homology not homology? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 675-680.
37. Zackson, S. L. (1984). Cell lineage, cell-cell interaction, and segment formation in the ectoderm of a glossiphoniid leech embryo. Dev. Biol. 104, 143-160.