Biocompatibility of a Flowable Composite Bonded with a Self-etching Adhesive Compared with a Glass Ionomer Cement and a High Copper Amalgam

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-28

  Shimada, Y ^a,c   Seki, Y ^a   Sasafuchi, Y ^a   Arakawa, M ^a   Burrow, M F ^b   Otsuki, M ^a   Tagami, J ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; AMALGAM; BIOMATERIAL; BUFFER; COPPER; COPPER DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DISPERSALLOY; EOSIN; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; FORMALDEHYDE; FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; HEMATOXYLIN; IMPERVA FLUORO BOND; RESIN;

ABSCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CEMENTATION; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; FLOW; HISTOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATORY INFILTRATE; MACACA; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIOLOGY; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; PATHOLOGY; PULPITIS; RANDOMIZATION; STAINING; TIME; TISSUE FIXATION; TISSUE NECROSIS; TISSUE REACTION; TISSUE SECTION; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MACACA; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1642519907     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA & Macchi RL (1997) Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures Quintessence International 28(8) 509-512.
2. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P & Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites Journal of the American Dental Association 129(5) 567-577.
3. Boston DW & Graver HT (1994) Histobacteriological analysis of acid red dye-stainable dentin found beneath intact amalgam restorations Operative Dentistry 19(2) 65-69.
4. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP & Chen YHC (2001) Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 85(2) 177-183.
5. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E & Bergenholtz G (1987) Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 57(1) 1-8.
6. Ferdianakis K (1998) Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 23(3) 221-229.
7. Finger WJ & Fritz U (1996) Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agent American Journal of Dentistry 9(5) 206-210.
8. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF & Sinhoreti MAC (1999) Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel American Journal of Dentistry 12(4) 181-184.
9. Hosoda H, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Harnirattisai C & Otsuki M (1991) Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities Operative Dentistry 16(4) 122-129.
10. ISO 7405 Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry - Test methods for dental materials (1997) International Standards Organization.
11. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2003) The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays Operative Dentistry 28(1) 28-35.
12. Kitasako Y, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sonoda H, Otsuki M & Tagami J (2000) Monkey pulpal response and microtensile bond strength beneath a one-application resin bonding system in vivo Journal of Dentistry 28(3) 193-198.
13. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y & Hayashi Y (2001) The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites Operative Dentistry 26(5) 451-459.
14. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK & Platt JA (2001) Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners Operative Dentistry 26(3) 302-307.
15. Mjör IA & Ferrari M (2002) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques Quintessence International 33(1) 35-63.
16. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ & Cox CF (2002) Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials Dental Materials 18(6) 470-478.
17. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K & Masuhara E (1982) The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 16(3) 265-273.
18. Shimada Y (1992) Pulpal response to various dentin conditioning agents Japan Journal of Conservative Dentistry 35(1) 69-100 (in Japanese).
19. rd International Kuraray symposium Kuraray Co Ltd 91-103.
20. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG & Ingram DV (1978) Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement British Dental Journal 144(11) 345-350.
21. Tolidis K & Setcos JC (1999) Initial degree of polymerization shrinkage exhibited by flowable composite resins Journal of Dental Research 78 Abstract #3015 p 482.
22. Wahl MJ (2001) Amalgam-Resurrection and redemption Part 1: The clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam Quintessence International 32(7) 525-535.
23. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N & Pashley DH (1994) Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer Journal of Dental Research 73(6) 1212-1220.
24. Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Bouillaguet S & Noda M (2003) In vitro biological response to core and flowable dental restorative materials Dental Materials 19(1) 25-31.