Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 557-568

  Boucher, Marie Carole ^a   Gresset, Jacques A ^a,b   Angioi, Karine ^a,c   Olivier, Sébastien ^a  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Nonmydriatic camera; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MYDRIASIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; SCREENING TEST; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STANDARD; STEREOSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPHY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1642516965     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-4182(03)80109-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 suppl): 766-85.
2. Ferris FL 3rd. How effective are treatments for diabetic retinopathy? JAMA 1993;269:1290-1.
3. Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, Ferris FL 3rd, Canner JK, Greenfield S. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care 1994;17:909-17.
4. Javitt JC, Aiello L. Cost effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:164-9.
5. American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:683-5.
6. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BEK. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology 1998;105:998-1003.
7. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. NIH publ 95-1468. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health; 1995. p. 293-301.
8. Vinicor F. Is diabetes a public-health disorder? Diabetes Care 1994;17(suppl 1):22-7.
9. Brechner RJ, Cowie CC, Howie LJ, Herman WH, Will JC, Harris MI. Ophthalmic examination among adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. JAMA 1993;270:1714-8.
10. Mukamel DB, Bresnick GH, Wang Q, Dickey CF. Barriers to compliance with screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1999;6:61-72.
11. Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Godine JE, Lou PL, D'Amico DJ, Regan CD, et al. Role of diabetologist in evaluating diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1991;14:26-33.
12. Sussman EJ, Tsiaris WG, Soper KA. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1982;247:3231-4.
13. Singer DE, Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Schachat AP. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:660-71.
14. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Neuer SM, Brothers RJ. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a non-mydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985;92:485-91.
15. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WAJ, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 1993;16:889-95.
16. Velez R, Haffner S, Stern MP, Van Heusen WAJ. Ophthalmologist versus retinal photographs in screening for diabetic retinopathy [abstract]. Clin Res 1987;35:363A.
17. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL, Inoveon Health Research Group. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology 2002;109:595-601.
18. Griffith SP, Freeman WL, Shaw CJ, Mitchell WH, Olden CR, Figgs LD, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography. J Fam Pract 1993;37:49-56.
19. Taylor R. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association Mobile Retinal Screening Group. Diabet Med 1996;13:946-52.
20. Backlund LB, Algvere PB, Rosenqvist U. Early detection of diabetic retinopathy by a mobile retinal photography service working primarily in partnership with primary health care teams. Diabet Med 1998;15(suppl 3):S32-7.
21. Marcus DM, Brooks SE, Ulrich LD, Bassi FH, Laird M, Johnson M, et al. Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1907-14.
22. Lee P. Telemedicine: opportunities and challenges for the remote care of diabetic retinopathy [editorial]. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1639-40.
23. Legorreta AP, Hasan MM, Peters AL, Pelletier KR, Leung KM. An intervention for enhancing compliance with screening recommendations for diabetic retinopathy. A bicoastal experience. Diabetes Care 1997;20:520-3.
24. Brailsford SC, Davies R, Canning C, Roderick PJ. Evaluating screening policies for the early detection of retinopathy in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Health Care Manage Sci 1998;1:115-24.
25. Facey K, Cummins E, Macpherson K, Morris A, Reay L, Slattery I. Health Technology Assessment report 1. Organisation of services for diabetic retinopathy screening. Glasgow: Health Technology Board for Scotland; 2002. www.htbs.co.uk/docs/pdf/ASSESSMENT%20REPORT.pdf (accessed 2003 Jan 24).
26. Health Technology Board for Scotland. HTBS launches advice for world's first national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy [release]. 2002 Apr 2. www.htbs.co.uk/news/pressrel.asp?did=505 (accessed 2002 May 10).
27. Young S, George LD, Lusty J, Owens DR. A new screening tool for diabetic retinopathy: the Canon CR5 45NM retinal camera with Frost Medical Software RIS-lite digital imaging system. J Audiov Media Med 1997;20:11-4.
28. Ryder REJ, King N, Bates AS, Sim J, Welch J, Kritzinger EE. Instant electronic imaging systems are superior to Polaroid at detecting sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1998;15:254-8.
29. George LD, Halliwell M, Hill R, Aldington SJ, Lusty J, Dunstan F, et al. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1998;15:250-3.
30. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WMG, Alberg KGM. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1999;301:1243-7.
31. Lim JI, LaBree L, Nichols T, Cardenas I. A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35-millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:866-70.
32. Henricsson M, Karlsson C, Ekholm L, Laikkonen P, Sellman A, Steffert E, et al. Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening - a comparison. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:164-8.
33. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2001;108:572-85.
34. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 suppl):786-806.
35. Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK. Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia 1995;38(4):437-44.
36. Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JCA, Cole DR. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:19-24.
37. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998;21(suppl 1):S5-19.
38. Gibbins RL, Owens DR, Allen JC, Eastman L. Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides. Diabetologia 1998;41:59-64.
39. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
40. Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, Klein BE. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:823-8.
41. Baker SB, Vallbona C, Campbell JV, Hamill MB, Goetz B, West MS. Diabetic eye disease detection by primary-care physicians. Diabetes Care 1990;13:908-9.
42. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:527-32.
43. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthahnol 1984;102:520-6.
44. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:823-33.