Do high technology agglomerations encourage urban sprawl?

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 663-682

  Felsenstein, Daniel ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 1642512118     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001680200101     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acs ZJ, Ndikumwami A (1998) High technology employment growth in major U.S. metropolitan areas. Small Business Economics 10:47-59
2. Anderson NB, Bogart WT (2001) The structure of sprawl: Identifying and characterizing employment centers in polycentric metropolitan areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60(1):147-169
3. Audretsch DB (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(2):18-29
4. Bania N, Eberts RW, Fogarty MS (1993) Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? Review of Economics and Statistics 75(4);761-766
5. Beeson P, Montgomery E (1993) The effects of colleges and universities on local labor markets. Review of Economics and Statistics 75(4):753-761
6. Bogart WT (1998) The economics of cities and suburbs. Prentice Hall, NJ
7. Brueckner JK (2000) Urban sprawl; diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23(2):160-171
8. Burchell EW (1997) Economic and fiscal costs (and benefits) of sprawl. The Urban Lawyer 29(2):159-181
9. Castells M, Hall P (1994) Technopoles of the World: The making of 21st century industrial complexes. Routledge, London
10. Cervero R (1986) Jobs-housing balancing and regional mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association 55(2): 136-150
11. Cervero R (1986) Jobs-housing balance revisited; Trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(3):492-511
12. Cervero R (2001) Efficient urbanization: Economic performance and the shape of the metropolis. Urban Studies 38(10):1651-1671
13. DeVol RC (1999) America's high tech economy: Growth, development and risks for metropolitan areas. Milken Institute, Los Angeles, CA
14. Ding C, Bingham RD (2000) Beyond edge cities: Job decentralization and urban sprawl. Urban Affairs Review 35(6):837-855
15. Ding C, Knaap GJ, Hopkins LD (1999) Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 46:53-68
16. Downs A (1992) Stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour congestion. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC
17. Eisinger PK (1988) The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI
18. Feldman MP (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer, Dordrecht
19. Garin RA (1966) A matrix formulation of the lowry model for intra-metropolitan actitvity location. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 32:361-364
20. Giuliano G, Small K (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21:163-182
21. Glaeser EL, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Schleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100:1126-1152
22. Glaeser EL, Kahn M (2001) Decentralized employment and the transformation of the American city. In: Gale WG, Rothenberg-Pack J (eds) Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs 2001. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
23. Glaeser EL, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography 1:27-50
24. Gottlieb PD (1994) Amenities as an economic development tool: Is there enough evidence? Economic Development Quarterly 8(3):270-285
25. Guhathakurta S, Wichert ME (1998) Who pays for growth in the city of Pheonix? An equity based perspective on suburbanization. Urban Affairs Review 33(6):813-838
26. Herzog HW, Schlottmann AW (1991) Metropolitan dimensions of high technology location in the U.S.: Worker mobility and residential choice. In: Herzog HW, Schlottmann AM (eds) Industry location and public policy. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville TN, pp 169-189
27. ITEP (2000) Another way sprawl happens: Economic development subsidies in a Twin Cities suburb. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, Washington DC
28. Kotkin J, DeVol RC (2001) Knowledge-value cities in the digital age. Milken Institute, Los Angeles, CA
29. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Landis J (2001) Sprawl in California: Its extent, consequences and future. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA
31. Lowry IS (1964) A model of the Metropolis. Memorandum RM-4035-RC, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica
32. Luger MI, Goldstein HA (1991) Technology in the garden: Research parks and regional economic development. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
33. Malecki EJ, Bradbury SL (1992) R&D facilities and professional labor: Labor force dynamics in high technology. Regional Studies 26:123-136
34. Markusen A, Hall P, Glasmeier A (1986) High-tech America - The how, what, where and why of the sunrise industries. Allen and Unwin, Boston
35. Markusen A, McCurdy K (1989) Chicago's defense-based high technology: A case study of the 'seedbeds of innovation' hypothesis. Economic Development Quarterly 3(1): 15-31
36. Markusen A, Chapple K, Schrock G, Yamamoto D, Yu P (2001) High tech and I-tech: How metros rank and specialize. Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minneapolis, MN
37. McDonald JF (1987) The identification of urban employment subcenters. Journal of Urban Economics 21:242-258
38. McMillen DP, McDonald JF (1997) Population density in suburban Chicago; A bid rent approach. Urban Studies 35(7): 1119-1130
39. McMillen DP, McDonald JF (1998) Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics 43:157-180
40. NIPC (1998) 1990 Land use summary for northeastern Illinois. Northeastern Illinois Planning Commisssion 〈available at http://www.nipc.cog.il.us/lu- sum.htm〉
41. Persky J, Wiewel W (2001) When corporations leave town: The costs and benefits of metropolitan job sprawl. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI
42. Reese LA (1992) Explaining the extent of local economic development activity: Evidence from Canadian cities. Environment and Planning C 10:105-120
43. Schneider M, Kim D (1996) The effects of local conditions on economic growth, 1977-1990: The changing location of high technology activities. Urban Affairs Review 32(2):131-156
44. Shearmur R, Doloreux D (2000) Science parks: Actors or reactors? Canadian science parks in their urban context. Environment and Planning A 32:1065-1082
45. Sivitanidou R, Sivitanides P (1995) The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science 35(3):391-415
46. Steinnes D (1982) Do 'people follow jobs' or 'do jobs follow people'? A causality issue in urban economics. Urban Studies 19:187-192
47. Stough RR, Haynes KE, Campbell HS (1998) Small business entrepreneurship in the high technology services sector: An assessment for the edge cities of the US National Capital region. Small Business Economics 10:61-74
48. Suarez-Villa L, Walrod W (1997) Operational strategy, R&D and intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: The advanced electronics industries of the Los Angeles Basin. Urban Studies 34(9): 1343-1380
49. Thurston L, Yezer A (1994) Causality in the suburbanization of population and employment. Journal of Urban Economics 35:105-118
50. Treyz GI, Rickman DS, Shao G (1992) The REMI economic-demographic forecasting and simulation model. International Regional Science Review 12:2221-2254
51. Treyz GI (1993) Regional economic modeling: A systematic approach to economic forecasting and policy analysis. Kluwer, Boston
52. Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer, Boston