Endothelial Cell Injury and Platelet Aggregation Induced by Contrast Ultrasonography in the Rat Hepatic Sinusoid

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-36

  Shigeta, Kouichirou ^a   Itoh, Kouichi ^a   Ookawara, Shigeo ^a   Taniguchi, Nobuyuki ^a   Omoto, Kiyoka ^a  

^a JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Echo contrast agents; Endothelial cells; Hepatic sinusoid; Platelet aggregation; Rat; Safety; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; CELLS; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOLUTIONS;

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ULTRASONICS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GLUTARALDEHYDE; PARAFORMALDEHYDE; PHOSPHATE; SHU 508; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CELL VACUOLE; CONTRAST ECHOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SAFETY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; KUPFFER CELL; LEUKOCYTE; LIVER SINUSOID; MALE; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; RAT; THROMBOCYTE; THROMBOCYTE AGGREGATION;

EID: 1642495673     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.1.29     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Feinstein SB, Cheirif J, Ten Cate FJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary ultrasound contrast agent: initial multicenter clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:316-324.
2. Kitzman DW, Wesley DJ. Safety assessment of perflenapent emulsion for echocardiographic contrast enhancement in patients with congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Heart J 2000; 139:1077-1080.
3. Miller DL, Gies RA. Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24:1201-1208.
4. Miller DL, Gies RA. The influence of ultrasound frequency and gas-body composition on the contrast agent-mediated enhancement of vascular bioeffects in mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26:307-313.
5. Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, Skalak TC, Kaul S. Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation 1998; 98:290-293.
6. Miller MW, Everbach EC, Cox C, Knapp RR, Brayman AA, Sherman TA. A comparison of the hemolytic potential of Optison and Albunex in whole human blood in vitro: acoustic pressure, ultrasound frequency, donor and passive cavitation detection considerations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:709-721.
7. Miller DL, Quddus J. Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrastagent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 661-667.
8. Crum LA, Roy RA, Dinno MA, et al. Acoustic cavitation produced by microsecond pulses of ultrasound: a discussion of some selected results. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91:1113-1119.
9. Williams AR, Kubowicz G, Cramer E, Schlief R. The effects of the microbubble suspension SH U 454 (Echovist) on ultrasound-induced cell lysis in a rotating tube exposure system. Echocardiography 1991; 8:423-433.
10. Carstensen EL, Kelly P, Church CC, et al. Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:147-165.
11. Penney DP, Schenk EA, Maltby K, Hartman-Raeman C, Child SZ, Carstensen EL. Morphological effects of pulsed ultrasound in the lung. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:127-135.
12. Kondo T, Kodaira T, Kano E. Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its effects on strand breakage in DNA of cultured FM3A cells. Free Radic Res Commun 1993; 19:S193-S200.
13. Steinbach P, Hofstaedter F, Nicolai H, Roessler W, Wieland W. Determination of the energy-dependent extent of vascular damage caused by high-energy shock waves in an umbilical cord model. Urol Res 1993; 21:279-282.
14. Miller DL, Nyborg WL, Whitcomb CC. Platelet aggregation induced by ultrasound under specialized conditions in vitro. Science 1979; 205:505-507.
15. Williams AR, Chater BV, Allen KA, Sherwood MR, Sanderson JH. Release of beta-thromboglobulin from human platelets by therapeutic intensities of ultrasound. Br J Haematol 1978; 40:133-142.
16. Pollachik SL, Chandler WL, Mourad PD, Ollos RL, Crum LA. Activation, aggregation and adhesion of platelets exposed to high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:1567-1576.
17. Everbach EC, Makin IR, Francis CW, Meltzer RS. Effect of acoustic cavitation on platelets in the presence of an echo-contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24:129-136.
18. Shigeta K, Taniguchi T, Omoto K, et al. In vitro platelet activation by an echo contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:365-373.
19. Skalak R, Chien S. Handbook of Bioengineering. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1987.
20. Charter BV, Williams AR. Platelet aggregation induced in vitro by therapeutic ultrasound. Thromb Haemost 1977; 38:640-651.
21. Williams AR, O'Brien WD, Coller JR. Exposure to ultrasound decreases the recalcification time of platelet rich plasma. Ultrasound Med Biol 1976; 2: 113-118.
22. Chen L, Rivens I, ter Haar G, Riddler S, Hill CR, Bensted JP. Histological changes in rat liver tumors treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:67-74.
23. Chen L, ter Haar G, Robertson D, Bensted JP, Hill CR. Histological study of normal and tumor-bearing liver treated with focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25:847-856.
24. Leighton TG. The Acoustic Bubble. London, England: Academic Press; 1994.
25. Bauer A, Blomely M, Leen E, Cosgrove D, Schlief R. Liver-specific imaging with SHU 563A: diagnostic potential of a new class of ultrasound contrast media. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9(suppl 3):S349-S352.
26. Marelli C. Preliminary experience with NC100100, a new ultrasound contrast agent for intravenous injection. Eur Radiol 1999; 9(suppl 3):S343-S346.
27. Yuko K, Gregory C, Thomas P, Geert W, Schmid S, Robert FM. Mechanism of parenchymal enhancement of the liver with a microbubble-based US contrast medium: an intravital microscopy study in rats. Radiology 2002; 224:253-257.