Expected opportunity cost guarantees and indifference zone selection procedures

Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 465-473

  Chick, Stephen E ^a  

^a INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; DECISION THEORY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

LEAST FAVORABLE CONFIGURATION (LFC); STATISTICAL SELECTION;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 1642437901     PISSN: 02750708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Bechhofer, R. E., T. J. Santner, and D. M. Goldsman. 1995. Design and analysis for statistical selection, screening, and multiple comparisons. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Chick, S. E., and K. Inoue. 2001a. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operations Research 49 (5): 732-743.
3. Chick, S. E., and K. Inoue. 2001b. New procedures for identifying the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Science 47 (8): 1133-1149.
4. Dudewicz, E. J., and S. R. Dalal. 1975. Allocation of observations in ranking and selection with unequal variances. Sanhkya B37 (1): 28-78.
5. Matejcik, F. J., and B. L. Nelson. 1995. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Operations Research 43 (4): 633-640.
6. Nelson, B. L., and S. Banerjee. 2001. Selecting a good system: Procedures and inference. IIE Transactions 33 (3): 149-166.
7. Nelson, B. L., J. Swann, D. Goldsman, and W. Song. 2001. Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Operations Research 49 (6): 950-963.
8. Rinott, Y. 1978. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Communications in Statistics A7 (8): 799-811.