Selecting a good system: Procedures and inference

IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 149-166

  Nelson, Barry L ^a   Banerjee, Souvik ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FAST RESPONSE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

LOWER CONFIDENCE BOUND (LCB);

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035277790     PISSN: 0740817X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007639112626     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andersen, P.O., Bishop, T.A. and Dudewicz, E.J. (1977) Indifference-zone ranking and selection: confidence intervals for true achieved P(CD). Communications in Statistics, A6, 1121-1132.
2. Bechhofer, R.E., Santner, T.J. and Goldsman, D.M. (1995) Design and Analysis for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons, John Wiley, New York.
3. Bofinger, E. (1994) Should we estimate the probability of a correct selection? Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 59-66.
4. Desruelle, P. and Steudel, H.J. (1996) A queuing network model of a single operator manufacturing workcell with machine/operator interference. Management Science, 42, 576-590.
5. Goldsman, D.M. and Nelson, B.L. (1998) Comparing systems via simulation, in Handbook of Simulation, Banks, J. (ed), John Wiley, New York, Ch. 8.
6. Hochberg, Y. (1975) Simultaneous inference under Beherns-Fisher conditions: a two stage approach. Communications in Statistics, A4, 1109-1119.
7. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A.C. (1987) Multiple Comparison Procedures, John Wiley, New York.
8. Hsu, J.C. (1984) Ranking and selection and multiple comparisons with the best, in Design of Experiments: Ranking and Selection, Santner, T.J. and Tamhane, A.J. (eds), Marcel Dekker, New York.
9. Hsu, J.C. (1996) Multiple Comparisons: Theory and methods, Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Jeon, J.-W., Kim, W.-C. and Jeong, G.-J. (1988) Confidence bounds on superiority. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Control, 16, 10-17.
11. Jeong, G.-J., Kirn,-W.-C. and Jeon, J.-W. (1989) A lower confidence bound on the probability of a correct selection of the / best populations. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 18, 26-37.
12. Kim, W.-C. (1986) A lower confidence bound on the probability of a correct selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 1012-1017.
13. Kim, W.-C. (1988) On detecting the best treatment. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 17, 82-92.
14. Nakade, K., Ohno, K. and Shantikumar, J.G. (1997) Bounds and approximations for cycle time of-a U-shaped production line. Operations Research Letters, 21, 191-200.
15. Nelson, B.L. and Goldsman, D.M. (1998) Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments. Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University.
16. Kelson, B.L. and Matejcik, FJ. (1995) Using common random numbers for indifference-zone selection and multiple comparisons in simulation. Management Science, 41, 1935-1945.
17. Rinott, Y. (1978) On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Communications in Statistics, A7, 799-811.
18. Stein, C. (1945) A two-sample test for a linear hypothesis whose power is independent of the variance. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 16, 243-258.
19. Tamhane, A.C. (1977) Multiple comparisons in model I one-way anova with unequal variances. Communications in Statistics, A6, 15-32. Barry L. Nelson is a Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences at Northwestern University,