Aspen regeneration in riparian management zones in Northern Minnesota: Effects of residual overstory and harvest method

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 79-84

  Palik, Brian ^a   Cease, Kory ^a   Egeland, Leanne ^a   Blinn, Charles ^b  

^a NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspen; BMP; Overstory retention; Riparian forests

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; ECOLOGY; FIBERS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRODUCTION; RESIDUAL FUELS; SOILS; TIMBER;

BMP; OVERSTORY RETENTION; POPULATION DEVELOPMENT; RIPARIAN FORESTS;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; POPULUS; PRODUCTION; SOIL;

CATOSTOMIDAE; POPULUS; RIPARIA;

EID: 1642403763     PISSN: 07426348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/20.2.79     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blinn, C.R., and M.A. Kilgure. 2001. Riparian management practices: A summary of state guidelines. J. For. 99 (1):11-17.
2. BROWER, J.E., AND J.H. ZAR. 1984. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. W.C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa. 226 p.
3. BURNS, G.A., R.M. WHITING, JR., G.M. LEGRANDE, AND J.G. DICKSON. 1999. Wildlife linkages: Volumes and values of residual timber in riparian zones in eastern Texas. For. Ecol. Manage. 114:321-327.
4. CHEN, J., J.F. FRANKLIN, AND T.A. SPIES. 1995. Growing-season microclimatic gradients from clearcut edges into old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Applic. 5:74-86.
5. GINGRAS, J.F. 1994. A comparison of full-tree versus cut-to-length systems in the Manitoba Model Forest. For. Eng. Res. Inst. of Canada, Spec. Rep. No. SR-92. Ottawa, Ont.
6. GINGRAS, J.F. 1995. Partial cutting in boreal mixedwoods: A comparison of productivity and site impacts with different harvesting systems. For. Eng. Res. Inst. of Canada (FERIC), Field Note No. 4. Ottawa. Ont.
7. GREGORY, S.V. 1997. Riparian management in the 21st century. P. 69-85 in Creating forestry for the 21st century, Kohm, K.A., and J.F. Franklin (eds.). Island Press, Washington, D.C.
8. HANOWSKI, J., N. DANZ, J. LIND, G. NIEMI, AND P. WOLTKR. 2001. Wildlife species: Responses to forest harvesting and management in riparian stands and landscapes. Final Rep. Minn. For. Resour. Counc., St. Paul, MN.
9. HUFFMAN, R.D., M.A. FAJVAN, AND P.B. WOOD. 1999. Effects of residual overstory on aspen development in Minnesota. Can. J. For. Res. 29:284-289.
10. LANFORD, B.L., AND B.J. STOKES. 1995. Comparison of two thinning systems. Part 1. Stand and site impacts. For. Prod. J. 45:74-79.
11. MURCIA, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. TREE 10:58-62.
12. PALIK, B.J., AND P.G. MURPHY. 1990. Edge versus disturbance effects in beech-sugar maple forest fragments. For. Ecol. Manage, 32:187-202.
13. PALIK, B., AND J. ZASADA. 2002. An ecological context for regenerating multi-cohort, mixed-species red pine forests. USDA For. Serv. Gen Tech. Rep. (In press).
14. PALIK, B.J., J. ZASADA, AND C. HEDMAN. 1999. Ecological considerations for riparian silviculture. P. 233-254 in Managing riparian areas of the eastern United States, Verry, E.S, J.W. Hornbeck, and C.A. Dolloff (eds.). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
15. PERALA, D.A. 1977. Manager's handbook for aspen in the North Central States. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-36.
16. PERALA, D.A. 1979. Regeneration and productivity of aspen grown on repeated short rotations. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-176.
17. PERALA, D. A., AND D. ALBAN. 1994. Allometric biomass estimators for aspen-dominated ecosystems in the upper Great Lakes. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-314.
18. PERRY, J., C. BLINN, R. NEWMAN, N. HEMSTAD, E. MERTEN, K. FREDRICK, M.K. Fox, B. PALIK, J. MATTSON, M. THOMPSON, S. VERRY, L. JOHNSON, C. RICHARDS, K. STROOM, J. SHOENBERG, R. DAHLMAN, AND P. EMERSON. 2001. Evaluating riparian area dynamics, management alternatives and impacts of harvest practices. Final rep. Minn. For. Resour. Counc., St. Paul, MN.
19. PIVA, R.J. 1999. Pulpwood production in the North-Central Region, 1997. USDA For. Serv. Resour. Bull. NC-195.
20. RICHARDSON, R., AND I. MAKRONEN. 1994. The performance of cut-to-length systems in eastern Canada. For. Eng. Res. Inst. of Canada (FERIC), Rep. No. TR-109. Ottawa, Ont.
21. STONE, D.M., J.A. GATES, AND J.D. ELIOFF. 1999. Are we maintaining aspen productivity on sand soils? P. 177-184 in Improving forest productivity for timber-a key to sustainability, Zumbahlen, B., and A.R. Ek (eds.). Dep. of For. Resour., Univ. of Minn., St. Paul.
22. Stone, D.M., J.D. Elioff, D.V. Potter, D.B. Peterson, and R. Wagner. 2001. Restoration of aspen-dominated ecosystems in the Lake States. P. 137-143 in In sustaining aspen in western landscapes. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-P-18.