Effects of residual overstory on aspen development in Minnesota

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 284-289

  Huffman, Ronald D ^a,b,c   Fajvan, Mary Ann ^a,b,c   Wood, Petra Bohall ^a,b,c  

^a US Geological Service   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

EID: 0032915347     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x98-202     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bates, P.C., Blinn, C.R., Alm, A.A., and Perala, D.A. 1989. Aspen stand development following harvest in the lake states region. North. J. Appl. For. 6(4): 178-183.
2. Crouch, G.L. 1983. Aspen regeneration after commercial clearcutting in southwestern Colorado. J. For. 83: 316-319.
3. Ffolliott, P.F., and Gottfried, G.J. 1991. Mixed conifer and aspen regeneration in small clearcuts within a partially harvested Arizona mixed conifer forest. USDA For. Serv. Rocky Mount. For. Range Exp. Stn. Res. Pap. No. RM-294.
4. Hove, G.P., and Blinn, C.R. 1990. Aspen stand development in Beltrami County, Minnesota. In Proceedings of the 1989 Aspen Symposium, 25-27 July 1989, Duluth, Minn. Edited by R.D. Adams. USDA, For. Serv. North Cent. For. Exp. Stn. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-140. pp. 113-121.
5. Huffman, R.D., Wood, P.B., and Samuel, D.W. 1997. Effects of residual overstory on bird use and regeneration in aspen harvest sites in Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota. Final Report, West Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
6. Jaakka Pöyry Consulting, Inc. 1994. Final generic environmental impact statement study on timber harvesting and forest management in Minnesota. Jaakko Pöyry Consulting, Inc., Tarrytown, N.Y.
7. James, F.C., and Shugart, H.H., Jr. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes, 24: 727-736.
8. Krasny, M.E., and Johnson, E.A. 1992. Stand development in aspen clones. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1424-1429.
9. Oliver, C.D. 1978. Development of northern red oak in mixed species stands in central New England. Yale Univ. Sch. For. Environ. Stud. Bull. No. 91.
10. Oliver, C.D., and Larson, B.C. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. Update edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. Perala, D.A. 1986. Aspen management. In Proceedings of the Integrated Pest Management Symposium for Northern Forests. University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service, Madison.
12. Perala, D.A. 1990. Populus tremuloides Michx. Quaking aspen. In Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods Technical coordinators: R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. No. 654. pp. 555-569.
13. SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT users guide, version 6 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
14. Schier, G.A., and Smith, A.D. 1979. Sucker regeneration in a Utah aspen clone after clearcutting, partial cutting, scarification, and girdling. USDA For. Serv. Intermount. For. Range Exp. Stn. Res. Note No. INT-253.
15. Scott, C.T. 1993. Optimal design of a plot cluster for monitoring. In Proceedings of the Optimal Design of Forest Experiments and Forest Surveys, 10-14 Sept. 1991, London, England. Edited by K. Rennolls and G. Gertner. School of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computing, University of Greenwich, London. pp. 233-242.
16. Smith, D.M, Larson, B.C., Kelty, M.J., and Ashton, P.M.S. 1997. The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. 9th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Stoeckeler, J.H., and Macon, J.W. 1956. Regeneration of aspen cutover areas in northern Wisconsin. J. For. 56: 13-16.
18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Unpublished Annual Narrative Report, Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Rochert, Minnesota.
19. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Unpublished Forest Management Plan, Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, Rochert, Minnesota.
20. Zehngraff, P.J. 1947. Response of young aspen suckers to overhead shade. USDA For. Serv. Lake States For. Exp. Stn. Tech. Note No. 278.