Radar inaccuracies and mid-air collision risk: Part 1 a dynamic methodology

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 25-37

  Brooker, Peter ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mid air collision; Radar separation minima

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; NAVIGATION;

EID: 1642385330     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463303002558     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brooker, P. (2002). Future Air Traffic Management: Quantitative En Route Safety Assessment Part 1 - Review of Present Methods. This Journal, 55, 197-211.
2. Brooker, P. (2003). Lateral Collision Risk in Air Traffic Track Systems: a 'Post-Reich' Event Model. This Journal, 56, 399-409.
3. Greenwood, J., Fearn, T. and Pitts, S. M. (1994). Criteria for the accuracy of Radar required to support a given Separation Minimum. CS Report 9449, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
4. MATS Part I (2003). CAP 493 Manual of Air Traffic Services ('MATS') Part 1, Civil Aviation Authority, London. http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP493_Part1.pdf
5. NATSPG - North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (2002). Summary of Discussions and Conclusions of the North Atlantic Systems Planning Group. NATSPG/38.
6. RSSWG CAA (1982). Radar Separation Standards Working Group Report: Volume One. CAA Paper 82014, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
7. Sanne, J. M. (1999). Creating Safety in Air Traffic Control. Arkiv Förlag, Sweden.
8. Sharpe, A. G. (1988). The rationale of radar separation standards: a discussion paper. DORA Communication 8824, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
9. Sharpe, A. G. (1991). Application of the 5 nm radar standard separation at ranges up to 160 nm from Claxby, Debden and Pease Pottage SSRs. CAA Paper 91013. Civil Aviation Authority, London.
10. UK Airprox Board (1999 onwards - biannual). Analysis of Airprox in UK Airspace.