The role of scientific literature in electronic scholarly communication

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 22, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 71-100

  Cruickshakn, John ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Information retrieval; Information seeking behavior; Scholarly communication; Scientific communication; Scientific literature

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 1642351482     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J122v22n03_08     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Richard, Abel. 1991. Invisible colleges, information, and libraries. Library Acquisitions:Practice & Theory, 15:271–277.
2. Agre, Philip E., 1995. Institutional circuitry:thinking about the forms and uses of information. Information Technology and Libraries, 14:225–230.
3. Blair, David C., 2002. Some thoughts on the reported results of TREC. Information Processing and Management, 38:445–451.
4. Borgman, C. L., 1999. What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35:227–243.
5. 2000. Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56(no. 4):412–430.
6. Matthew, Chalmers. 1999. Comparing information access approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(no. 12):1108–1118.
7. Cleverdon, C. W., 1974. User evaluation of information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 30(no. 2):170
8. Cooper, M. D., 2001. Usage patterns of a Web-based library catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(no. 2):137–48.
9. Covi, Lisa. 1999. Material mastery:situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing and Management, 35:293–316.
10. Crawford, Susan Y., Julie, Hurd M., and Ann, Weller C., 1996. From print to electronic:the transformation of scientific communication, Medford, N.J.:Information Today, Inc.
11. Davidson, P. S., McDonagh, Meldrum J.D.P., and Moss, A., 1988. International bibliographic review on costs and modelling in information retrieval:Report on completion of data collection, assessment of the efficiency of searching, and on means of indexing this information, London:British Library.
12. Ellis, David, Wilson, T. D., Ford, Nigel, Foster, Allen, Lam, H. M., Burton, R., and Spink, Amanda. 2002. Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 5. User-intermediary interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(no. 11):883–893.
13. Fleck, L., 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact, Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
14. Garvey, W. D., 1979. Communication:The Essence of Science, Elmsford, NY:Pergamon Press.
15. Garvey, W. D., and Griffith, B. C., 1972. Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines:Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8:123–126.
16. Gladney, H. M., Fox, E. A., Ahmed, Z., Ashany, R., Belkin, N. J., and Zemankova, M., 1994. Digital library:gross structure and requirements, report from a March 1994 workshop available at:www.csdl.tamu.edu/csdl/DL94/paper/fox.html (accessed January 8, 2003).
17. Gould, Constance G., and Pierce, Karla. 1991. Information needs in the sciences:An assessment, Mountain View, CA:The Research Libraries Group.
18. Rebecca, Green. 1995. Topical relevance relationships. I. Why topic matching fails. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(no. 9):646–653.
19. Harter, Stephen P., 1984. Scientific inquiry:a model for online searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(no. 2):110–117.
20. 1990. Search term combinations and retrieval overlap:a proposed methodology and case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(no. 2):132–146.
21. Hersh, W., Turpin, A., Price, S., Kraemer, D., Olson, D., Chan, B., and Sacherek, L., 2001. Challenging conventional assumptions of automated information retrieval with real users:Boolean searching and batch retrieval evaluations. Information Processing and Management, 37(no. 3 (May):383–402.
22. Hopkins, Richard L., 1995. Countering information overload:the role of the librarian. The Reference Librarian, 49/50:305–33.
23. Ingwersen, Peter. 1996. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction:elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(no.1):3–50.
24. Kochen, M., 1969. Stability in the growth of knowledge. American Documentation, 20(no. 3):186–197.
25. Kochen, M., 1974. Integrative mechanisms in literature growth, Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.
26. Lancaster, F. W., and Sandore, Beth. 1997. Technology and Management in Library and Information Services, Champaign, Ill.:University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
27. Mizzaro, Stefano. 1997. Relevance:the whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9):810–832.
28. Norvig, P., 1994. Review of text-based intelligent systems. Artificial Intelligence, 65:181–188.
29. Oppenheim, C., and Smithson, D., 1999. What is a hybrid library?. Journal of Information Science, 25(no. 2):97–112.
30. Palmer, Judith. 1991. Scientists and information:I. Using cluster analysis to identify information style. Journal of Documentation, 47(no. 2):105–129.
31. Popper, K. R., 1959. The logic of scientific discovery, New York:Basic Books.
32. 1979. Objective knowledge:an evolutionary approach, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
33. Price, D., and de Solla, J., 1963. Little Science, big science, New York:Columbia University Press.
34. Rowley, Jennifer. 1994. The controlled versus natural indexing languages debate revisited:a perspective on information retrieval practice and research. Journal of Information Science, 20(no. 2):108–119.
35. Rusbridge, C., 1998. Towards the hybrid library. D-Lib Magazine, available at:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/rusbridge/07rusbridge.html (accessed 2 January 2003).
36. Salton, G., 1991. Developments in automatic text retrieval. Science, 253:974–980.
37. Saracevic, T., Mokros, H., and Su, L., Nature of the interaction between users and intermediaries in on-line searching:A qualitative analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 27, pp.47–54.
38. Saracevic, Tefko, Voorhees, E., and Harman, D., 2003. Letters to the editor. Information Processing and Management, 39:153–159.
39. Sembok, T. M.T., and van Rijsbergen, C. J., 1990. Silol:A simple logical-linguistic document retrieval system. Information Processing and Management, 26(no. 1):111–134.
40. Sloan, B. G., 1998. Service perspectives for the digital library remote reference services. Library Trends, 47(no. 1):117–43.
41. Smith, Elizabeth S., 1993. On the shoulders of giants:from Boole to Taube:the origins and development of computerized information from the mid-19th century to the present. Information Technology and Libraries, 12:217–226.
42. Jones, Sparck, and Karen. 2000. Further reflections on TREC. Information Processing and Management, 36:37–85.
43. Sparck Jones, Karen. 2003. Letters to the editor. Information Processing and Management, 39:153–159.
44. Spink, A., and Saracevic, T., 1997. Interaction in IR:Selection and effectiveness of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(no. 8):741–761.
45. Stoan, Stephen K., 1991. Research and information retrieval among academic researchers:implications and library instruction. Library Trends, 39(no. 3):238–57.
46. Su, L. T., 1994. The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(no. 3):207–217.
47. Subramanyam, Krishna. 1981. Scientific and technical information resources, New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc.
48. Swanson, Don R., 1990. Integrative mechanisms in the growth of knowledge:A legacy of Manfred Kochen. Information Processing & Management, 26(no. 1):9–16.
49. 1997. Historical Note:Information retrieval and the future of an illusion
50. Readings in Information Retrieval, San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
51. Swanson, Don R., and Neil, Smalheiser R., 1997. An interactive system for finding complementary literatures:a stimulus to scientific discovery. Artificial Intelligence, 91:183–203.
52. Wallis, Peter, and James, Thom A., 1996. Relevance judgements for assessing recall. Information Processing and Management, 32(no. 3):273–286.
53. Waters, D. J., 1998. What are digital libraries?. CLIR Issues, 4 available at:http://www.clir.org/pubs/issues/issues04.html#dlf (accessed 2 January 2003).