Construct Validity of the PASS Theory and CAS: Correlations with Achievement

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 174-181

  Naglieri, Jack A ^a   Rojahn, Johannes ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642340297     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.174     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boake, C. (2002). From the Binet-Simon to the Wechsler-Bellevue: Tracing the history of intelligence testing. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 3, 383-405.
2. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
5. Markwardt, F. C. (1997). Peabody Individual Achievement Test - Revised, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
7. Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
8. Naglieri, J. A. (1999). Essentials of CAS Assessment. New York: Wiley.
9. Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419-433.
10. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997a). Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
11. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997b). Cognitive Assessment System interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
12. Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention to improve math calculation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591-597.
13. Naglieri, J. A., & Pickering, E. B. (2003). Helping children learn. Baltimore: Brookes.
14. Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). The relationships between general ability using the N-NAT and SAT Reading Achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 230-239.
15. Siegel, L. S. (1988). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
16. Stanford Achievement Test (9th ed.). (1995). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
17. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278-303.
18. Vellutino, F. R. (2001). Further analysis of the relationship between reading achievement and intelligence: Response to Naglieri. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 306-310.
19. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
20. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
21. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
22. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Revised Tests of Cognitive Ability: Standard and supplemental batteries, Itasca, IL: Riverside.