Carotid arteries: Maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering

Radiology

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 265-273

  Huston III, John ^a   Fain, Sean B ^a   Riederer, Stephen J ^a   Wilman, Alan H ^a   Bernstein, Matt A ^a   Busse, Reed F ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Carotid arteries, MR; Magnetic resonance (MR), three dimensional; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Indexed keywords

GADOTERIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032957537     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap08265     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991; 22:711-720.
2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial affect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:445-453.
3. European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70%-99%) or mild (0%-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337:1235-1243.
4. Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, et al. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis: Veteran Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA 1991; 266: 3289-3294.
5. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1415-1425.
6. Golledge J, Wright R, Pugh N, Lane IF. Colourcoded duplex assessment alone before carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1234-1237.
7. Muto PM, Welch HJ, Mackey WC, O'Donnell TF. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: is duplex ultrasonography sufficient? J Vasc Surg 1996; 24:17-22.
8. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995; 26:1753-1758.
9. Huston J, Nichols DA, Luetmer PH, et al. MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:309-315.
10. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR 1994; 163:517-523.
11. Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, Eikelboom BC, Mali WPTM. CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993; 189:211-219.
12. Slosman F, Stolpen AH, Lexa FJ, et al. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR 1998; 170:489-495.
13. Krinsky G, Maya M, Rofsky N, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the aortic arch vessels in the detection of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular occlusive disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:167-178.
14. Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:283-289.
15. Lew RA, Maki JH. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries: two techniques. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:688-690.
16. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:345-351.
17. Foo TKF, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203:275-280.
18. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997; 205:137-146.
19. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J, Wald JT, Debbins JP. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:24-35.
20. Debbins JP, Riederer SJ, Rossman PJ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:588-595.
21. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988; 8:1-15.
22. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Performance of an elliptical spiral centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breathhold three dimensional gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38:793-802.
23. Du YP, Parker DE, Davis WL, Cao G. Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. JMRI 1994; 4:733-741.
24. Cloft HJ, Murphy KJ, Prince MR, Brunberg JA. 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 14:593-600.