Spatial point pattern analysis of available and exploited resources

Ecography

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 94-102

  Lancaster, Jill ^a   Downes, Barbara J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; CONSUMER-RESOURCE INTERACTION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POPULATION REGULATION; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; RESOURCE USE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

THORACICA;

EID: 1642300811     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03694.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen, M. 1992. Spatial analysis of two-species interactions. - Oecologia 91: 134-140.
2. Atkinson, W. D. and Shorrocks, B. 1984. Aggregation of larval Diptera over discrete and ephemeral breeding sites: the implications for coexistence. - Am. Nat. 124: 336-351.
3. Baddeley, A. J. et al. 2000. Estimating the J function without edge correction. - Stat. Neerlandica 54: 315-328.
4. Bailey, R. H. 1976. Ecological aspects of dispersal and establishment in lichens. - In: Brown, D. H., Hawksworth, D. L. and Bailey, R. H. (eds), Lichenology: progress and problems. Academic Press, pp. 215-247.
5. Besag, J. 1977. Contribution to the discussion of Dr Ripley's paper. - J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39: 193-195.
6. Besag, J. and Diggle, P. J. 1977. Simple Monte Carlo tests for spatial pattern. - Appl. Stat. 26: 327-333.
7. Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 343-366.
8. Cole, R. G. and Syms, C. 1999. Using spatial pattern analysis to distinguish causes of mortality: an example from kelp in north-eastern New Zealand. - J. Ecol. 87: 963-972.
9. Coomes, D. A., Rees, M. and Turnbull, L. 1999. Identifying aggregation and association in fully mapped spatial data. - Ecology 80: 554-565.
10. Diggle, P. J. 1983. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. - Academic Press.
11. Doak, P. 2000. Habitat patchiness and the distribution, abundance, and population dynamics of an insect herbivore. - Ecology 81: 1842-1857.
12. Fahrig, L. and Paloheimo, J. 1988. Effect of spatial arrangement of habitat patches on local population size. - Ecology 69: 468-475.
13. Gignoux, J., Duby, C. and Barot, S. 1999. Comparing the performances of Diggle's tests of spatial randomness for small samples with and without edge-effect correction: application to ecological data. - Biometrics 55: 156-164.
14. Goreaud, F. and Pélissier, R. 1999. On explicit formulas of edge effect correction for Ripley's K-function. - J. Veg. Sci. 10: 433-438.
15. Haase, P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. - J. Veg. Sci. 6: 575-582.
16. Haase, P. 2001. Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species reveal physical vs. biotic facilitation? - J. Veg. Sci. 12: 127-136.
17. Hartley, S. and Shorrocks, B. 2002. A general framework for the aggregation model of coexistence. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 651-662.
18. Hartnoll, R. G. and Hawkins, S. J. 1985. Patchiness and fluctuations on moderately exposed rocky shores. - Ophelia 24: 53-64.
19. Heard, S. B. 1998. Resource patch density and larval aggregation in mushroom-breeding flies. - Oikos 81: 187-195.
20. Hills, J. M. and Thomason, J. C. 1996. A multi-scale analysis of settlement density and pattern dynamics of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. - Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 138: 103-115.
21. Ives, A. R. 1991. Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community. - Ecol. Monogr. 61: 75-94.
22. Jeffery, C. J. 2000. Settlement in different-sized patches by the gregarious intertidal barnacle Chamaesipho tasmanica Foster and Anderson in New South Wales. - J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252: 15-26.
23. Krijger, C. L. and Sevenster, J. G. 2001. Higher species diversity explained by stronger spatial aggregation across six neotropical Drosophila communities. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 106-115.
24. Lancaster, J., Downes, B. J. and Reich, P. 2003. Linking landscape patterns of resource distribution with models of aggregation in ovipositing stream insects. - J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 969-978.
25. Lotwick, H. W. and Silverman, B. W. 1983. Methods for analysing spatial processes of several types of points. - J. R. Stat. Soc. B 44: 406-413.
26. Martens, S. N. 1997. Scales of above-ground and below-ground competition in a semi-arid woodland detected from spatial pattern. - J. Veg. Sci. 8: 655-664.
27. McIntyre, N. E. and Wiens, J. A. 2000. A novel use of the lacunarity index to discern landscape function. - Landscape Ecol. 15: 313-321.
28. Palmer, M. A. et al. 2000. Streambed landscapes: evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches. - Landscape Ecol. 15: 563-576.
29. Peckarsky, B. L., Taylor, B. W. and Caudill, C. C. 2000. Hydrologic and behavioral constraints on oviposition of stream insects: implications for adult dispersal. - Oecologia 125: 186-200.
30. Penttinen, A., Stoyan, D. and Henttonen, H. M. 1992. Marked point processes in forest statistics. - For. Sci. 38: 806-824.
31. Reich, P. and Downes, B. J. 2003. The distribution of aquatic invertebrate egg masses in relation to physical characteristics of oviposition sites at two Victorian upland streams. - Freshwater Biol. 48: 1497-1513.
32. Remer, L. C. and Heard, S. B. 1998. Local movement and edge effects on composition and coexistence in ephemeral-patch models. - Am. Nat. 152: 896-904.
33. Ripley, B. D. 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary processes. - J. Appl. Prob. 13: 255-266.
34. Ripley, B. D. 1981. Spatial statistics. - Wiley.
35. Rowlingson, B. S. and Diggle, P. J. 1993. Splancs: spatial point pattern analysis code in S-Plus. - Comp. Geosci. 19: 627-655.
36. Silver, P. et al. 2000. The arrangement of resources in patchy landscapes: effects of distribution, survival, and resource acquisition of chironomids. - Oecologia 124: 216-224.
37. Tenhumberg, B. et al. 2001. The effect of resource aggregation at different scales: optimal foraging behavior of Cotesia rubecula. - Am. Nat. 158: 505-518.
38. Tripet, F., Christe, P. and Møller, A. P. 2002. The importance of host spatial distribution for parasite specialization and speciation: a comparative study of bird fleas (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 735-748.
39. Ward, J. S. and Ferrandino, F. J. 1999. New derivation reduces bias and increases power of Ripley's L index. - Ecol. Modell. 116: 225-236.
40. Ward, J. S., Parker, G. R. and Ferrandino, F. J. 1996. Long-term spatial dynamics in an old-growth deciduous forest. - For. Ecol. Manage. 83: 189-202.
41. Warren, J. 2003. Isolation by distance in the crustose lichens Candelariella vitellina and Placynthium nigrum colonising gravestones in northeast Scotland. - Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 217-224.
42. With, K. A. and Crist, T. O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. - Ecology 76: 2446-2459.
43. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1997. The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. - Oikos 79: 219-229.