Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 157-158

  Villar, R ^a  

^a BUPA Hospitals   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT;

EDITORIAL; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 1642300425     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.15231     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Wagner H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 1978;134:102-30.
2. Head WC. Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip: analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1981;63-A:420-7.
3. Capello WN, Trancik TM, Misamore G, Eaton R. Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982;170:50-5.
4. Bierbaum BE, Sweet R. Complications of resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;73:761-75.
5. Head WC. The Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:789-97.
6. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66-A:228-41.
7. Ritter MA, Gloe TJ. Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty: A long term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68-A:216-25.
8. Amstutz HC. Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty: A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;8-A:1464.
9. Freeman MA, Bradley GW. ICLH surface replacement of the hip: an analysis of the first 10 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1983;65-B:405-1.
10. Daniel J, Pynset PB, McMinn DJW. Survival analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:iN press.
11. Howie D, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty: The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:708-14.
12. Faris PM, Ritter MA, Bicknell R, Keating EM. Long-term follow-up of the Indiana conservative resurfacing arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 1990;1:12-5.
13. Amstutz HC, Kim WC, O'Carroll PF, Kabo JM. THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty: Evolution and long-term results. Clin Orthop 1986;213:92-114.
14. Ward R. Heavy metal is hip again. Daily Telegraph 29 June 1999;1495.
15. Welch HG, Mogielnicki J. Presumed benefit: Lessons from the American experience with marrow transplantation for breast cancer BMJ 2002;324:1088-92.
16. Bezwoda WR, Seymour L, Dansey R. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic rescue as a primary treatment for metastatic breast: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2483-9.
17. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonck R. Early results of a primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 2002;12:158-62.
18. NICE. Guidance on the selection of prostheses for primary total hip replacement. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No 2. April 2000.
19. NICE. Final appraisal determination metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. www.nice.org.uk. 23 April 2002.
20. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith, Murray DW. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:iN press.
21. Kishida Y, Sugan N, Nishii T. et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:iN press.
22. Clarke MT, Lee PTH, Arora A, Villar RN. Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B: 913-7.