Validation of the French version of the Eysenck's impulsiveness questionnaire (I7). Influence of personality, gender, and religion;Validation de la version française du questionnaire I7 d'impulsivité. Influence de la personnalité, du sexe et de la religion

Annales Medico-Psychologiques

Volumn 162, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 116-121

  Zimmermann, G ^a,b   Rossier, J ^a,c   Meyer De Stadelhofen, F ^a  

^a Institut De Psychologie   (Switzerland)

^b DEPT UNIV DE PSYCHIATRIE ADULTE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Five Factor Model; I7; Impulsiveness; Impulsivit ; Impulsivity; Mod le cinq facteurs; Personality; Personnalit ; Reliability; Validation; Venturesomeness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMOTION; EMPATHY; EXPERIENCE; EYSENCK IMPULSITIVITY SCALE; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPULSIVENESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RELIGION; THINKING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1642266660     PISSN: 00034487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2003.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition :1994;American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
2. Barratt E.S. Impulsivity: integrating cognitive behavioral, biological, and environmental data. McCown W.G., Johnson J.L., Shure M.B. The impulsive client: theory, research, and treatment. 1996;39-56 American Psychological Association, Washington.
3. Baylé F-J, Olié J-P. Concept d'impulsivité Ann Méd Psychol. 156:1998;588-595.
4. Bouvard M. Questionnaires et échelles d'évaluation de la personnalité 1999;Masson, Paris.
5. Cloninger C.R., Svrakic D.M., Przybeck T.R. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch of Gen Psychiatry. 50:1993;975-990.
6. Corulla W.J. A psychometric investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (revised) and its relationship to the I7 Impulsiveness Questionnaire. Pers Individ Differ. 8:1987;651-658.
7. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. 1992;Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
8. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Primary traits of Eysenck's P-E-N system: three-and-five factor solution. J Pers Soc Psychol. 69:1995;308-317.
9. Depue R.A., Colins P.F. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav Brain Sci. 22:1999;491-569.
10. Dickman S.J. Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 58:1990;95-102.
11. Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.J. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. 1968;Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego.
12. Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.J. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. 1975;Hodder & Stoughton, Londres.
13. Eysenck S.B.J. The I7: development of a measure of impulsivity and its relationship to the superfactors of personality. McCown W.G., Johnson J.L., Shure M.B. The impulsive client: theory, research, and treatment. 1996;141-150 American Psychological Association, Washington.
14. Eysenck S.B.J., Eysenck H.J. The place of impulsiveness in a dimensionnal system of personality description. Brit J Soc Clin Psychol. 16:1977;57-68.
15. Eysenck S.B.J., Eysenck H.J. Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensionnal system of personality description. Psychol Rep. 43:1978;1247-1255.
16. Eysenck S.B.J., Eysenck H.J. Impulsiveness and Venturesomeness in children. Pers Indiv Differ. 5:1980;315-321.
17. Eysenck S.B.J., Pearson P.R., Easting G., Allsopp J.F. Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Pers Indiv Differ. 6:1985;613-619.
18. Eysenck S.B.J., Zuckerman M. The relationships between sensation seeking and Eysenck's dimensions of personality. Brit J Psychol. 69:1978;483-487.
19. Hollander E., Evers M. New developments in impulsivity. Lancet. 358:2001;949-950.
20. Howell D.C. Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines. 1998;De Boeck Université Bruxelles.
21. Hutchinson G.T., Pathock-Peckham J.A., Cheong J.W., Nagoshi C.T. Personality predictors of religious orientation among protestant, catholic, and non religious college students. Pers Indiv Differ. 24:1998;145-151.
22. Kaiser H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 39:1974;31-36.
23. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Comparison of the EPI and psychoticism scale with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Pers Indiv Differ. 6:1985;587-597.
24. Pathock-Peckham J.A., Hutchinson G.T., Cheong J., Nagoshi C.T. Effect of religion and religiosity on alcohol use in a college student sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. 49:1998;81-88.
25. Patton J.H., Stanford M.S., Barratt E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol. 51:1995;768-774.
26. Rolland J.P., Parker W.D., Stumpf H.A. Psychometric examination of the French translation of the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI. J Pers Assess. 71:1998;269-271.
27. Rolland J.P., Petot J.M. Manuel de la version française du NEO PI-R. 1997;Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
28. Rossier J., Wenger S., Berthoud S. Validation de la version française du NEO PI-R et influence de l'âge, du sexe et de la profession. Psychologie et Psychométrie. 22:2001;59-82.
29. Wingrove J., Bond A.J. Impulsivity: a state as well as trait variable. Does mood awarness explain low correlations between trait and behavioural measures of impulsivity? Pers Indiv Differ. 22:1997;333-339.
30. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. 1979;Ellbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
31. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking and impulsivity: a mariage of traits made in biology. McCown W.G., Johnson J.L., Shure M.B., éds M.B. The impulsive client: theory, research, and treatment. 1996;71-92 American Psychological Association, Washington.
32. Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D.M., Joireman J., Teta P., Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models for personality : The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 65:1993;757-768.