Molecular phylogeny of Cotesia Cameron, 1891 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) parasitoids associated with Melitaeini butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Melitaeini)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 207-220

  Kankare, Maaria ^a   Shaw, Mark R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cotesia; Melitaeini; Microsatellites; mtDNA; Parasitoids; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; RIBOSOME DNA; SPACER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HYMENOPTERA; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA; DNA, INTERGENIC; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; HYMENOPTERA; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; NAD; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BRACONIDAE; COTESIA; EUPHYDRYAS; HYMENOPTERA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; MELITAEA; MELITAEINI; MICROGASTRINAE; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 1642265382     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Askew R.R., Shaw M.R. Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development. Wagge J., Greathead D. Insect Parasitoids. 1986;225-264 Academic Press, London
2. Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Edwards A.W.F. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:1967;233-257
3. Eliasson C.U. Studier av boknäftjärelens Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) förekomst och biologi i Västmanland. Ent. Tidskr. 112:1991;113-124
4. Eliasson C.U., Shaw M.R. Prolonged life cycles, oviposition sites, foodplants and Cotesia parasitoids of Melitaeini butterflies in Sweden. Oedippus. 21:2003;1-52
5. Erlich, P.R. & Hanski, I. (Eds.), 2004. On the wings of checkerspots: A model system in population biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
6. Erlich P.R., White R.R., Singer M.C., McKechnie S.W., Gilbert L.E. Checkerspot butterflies: a historical perspective. Science. 188:1975;221-228
7. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:1981;368-376
8. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution. 339:1985;783-791
9. Felsenstein, J., 1995. PHYLIP (Phylogenetic Inference Package), Version 3.57c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
10. Folmer O., Black M.B., Hoch W., Lutz R.A., Vrijehock R.C. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome. c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3:1994;294-299
11. Futuyma D.J., Moreno G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:1988;207-233
12. Ford H.D., Ford E.B. Fluctuation in numbers, and its influence on variation, in Melitaea aurinia, Rott. (Lepidoptera). Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 78:1930;345-351
13. Goldstein D.B., Ruiz-Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Feldman M.W. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Cenetics. 139:1995;463-471
14. Haeselbarth E. Zur Parasitierung der Puppen von Forleule (Panolis flammea (Schiff.)), Kiefernspanner (Bupalus piniarius (L.)) und Heidelbeerspanner (Boarmia bistortata (Goeze)) in bayerischen Kiefernwäldern. Z. Angew. Entomol. 87:1979;186-202. 311-322
15. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology. 1999;Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Higgins L.G. A revision of Phyciodes Hübner and related genera, with review of the classification of the Melitaeina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Ent.). 43:1981;77-243
17. Janz N., Nyblom K., Nylin S. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution. 55(4):2001;783-796
18. Jensen M.K., Kester K.M., Kankare M., Brown B.L. Characterization of microsatellite loci of parasitoid, Cotesia congregata (Say) (Hymenoptera). Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2:2002;346-348
19. Kambhampati S., Smith P.T. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect Mol. Biol. 4:1995;233-236
20. Komonen A. The parasitoid complex attacking Finnish populations of two threatened butterflies, Euphydryas maturna and E. aurinia. Baptria. 22:1997;105-109
21. Komonen A. Host species used by parasitoids of Melitaeini in southern France. Baptria. 22:1998;87-93
22. Kuussaari, M., van Nouhuys, S., Hellmann, J., Singer, M.C., 2004. Larval biology of checkerspot butterflies. In: Erlich, P.R., Hanski, I. (Eds.), On The Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System in Population Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
23. 2: all loci are equal, but some are more equal than others... Genetics. 161:2002;1339-1347
24. Lei G.C., Vikberg V., Nieminen M., Kuussaari M. The parasitoid complex attacking the Finnish populations of Glanville fritillary Melitaea cinxia (Lep: Nymphalidae), an endangered butterfly. J. Nat. Hist. 31:1997;635-648
25. Lei G.C., Hanski I. Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos. 78:1997;91-100
26. Lei G.C., Camara M.D. Behaviour of a specialist parasitoid, Cotesia melitaearum: from individual behaviour to metapopulation processes. Ecol. Ent. 24:1999;59-72
27. Liebherr J.C., Hajek A.E. A cladistic test of the taxon cycle and taxon pulse hypotheses. Cladistics. 6:1990;39-59
28. Marsh P.M. Braconidae. Krombein K.V., Hurd P.D., Smith D.R., Burk B.D. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica). vol. 1:1979;144-295 Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC
29. Mason, W.R.M., 1981. The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. No. 115, pp. 147
30. Moore S.D. Patterns of juvenile mortality within an oligophagous insect population. Ecology. 70:1989;1726-1737
31. Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987;Columbia University Press, New York, NY
32. Nixon G.E.J. A revision of the north-western European species of the glomeratus-group of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 64:1974;453-524
33. Ohta T., Kimura K. The model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a genetic population. Genet. Res. 22:1973;201-204
34. Orr M.R., Smith T.B. Ecology and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:1998;502-506
35. Papp J. A survey of the European species of Apanteles Först. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Microgastrinae). IX. The glomeratus-group 1. Ann. Hist-Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 78:1986;225-247
36. Papp J. A survey of the European species of Apanteles Först. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Microgastrinae). X. The glomeratus-group, 2 and the cultellatus-group. Ann. Hist-Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 79:1987;207-258
37. Porter, K., 1981. The population dynamics of small colonies of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford
38. Porter K. Multivoltinism in Apanteles bignellii and the influence of weather on synchronisation with its host Euphydryas aurinia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34:1983;155-162
39. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;817-818
40. Rodreguez F., Oliver J.F., Mar A., Medina J.R. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. J. Theor. Biol. 142:1990;485-501
41. Shaw, M.R., Huddleston, T., 1991. Classification and biology of braconid wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 7(11), Royal Entomological Society of London, pp. 126
42. Shaw M.R. Parasitoid host ranges. Hawkins B.A., Sheehan W. Parasitoid Community Ecology. 1994;111-144 Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Shaw M.R., Horstmann K. An analysis of host range in the Diadegma nanus group of parasitoids in Western Europe, with a key to species (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae). J. Hym. Res. 6:1997;273-296
44. Shaw M.R. Host ranges of Aleiodes species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and an evolutionary hypothesis. Melika G., Thuróczy C. Parasitic Wasps: Evolution, Systematics, Biodiversity and Biological Control. 2002;322-327 Agroinform, Budapest
45. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;651-701
46. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 139:1995;457-462
47. Stamp N.E. Effect of group size on parasitism in a natural population of the Baltimore Checkerspot Euphydryas phaeton. Oecologia. 49:1981;201-206
48. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
49. Takezaki N., Nei M. Genetic distances and recontruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite data. Genetics. 144:1996;389-399
50. Thomas C.D., Singer M.C. Scale-dependent evolution of specialization in a checkerspot butterfly: from individuals to metapopulations and ecotypes. Mopper S., Strauss S.Y. Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations. 1998;343-374 Chapman and Hall, New York, NY
51. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680
52. van Nouhuys, S., Hanski, I., 2004. Natural enemies of checkerspot butterflies. In: Erlich, P.R., Hanski, I. (Eds.), On the wings of checkerspots: a model system in population biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
53. van Veen F.J.F., Belshaw R., Godfray H.C.J. The value of the ITS2 region for the identification of species boundaries between Alloxysta hyperparasitoids (Hymenoptera: Charipidae) of aphids. Eur. J. Entomol. 100:2003;449-453
54. Wahlberg, N., 2000. The ecology and evolution of melitaeine butterflies. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland
55. Wahlberg N., Zimmermann M. Pattern of phylogenetic relationships among members of the tribe Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences. Cladistics. 16:2000;347-363
56. Wahlberg N., Kullberg J., Hanski I. Natural History of some Siberian melitaeine butterfly species (Melitaeini: Nymphalidae) and their parasitoids. Ent. Fenn. 12:2001;72-77
57. Warren M.S. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly Mellicta athalia. J. Appl. Ecol. 24:1987;499-513
58. White, R.R., 1973. Community relationships of the butterfly Euphydryas editha. PhD thesis. Stanford University
59. Williams E.H., Holdren C.E., Ehrlich P.R. The life history and ecology of Euphydryas gillettii Barnes (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 38:1984;1-12
60. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;306-314