Software performance models from system scenarios

Performance Evaluation

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 65-89

  Petriu, Dorin Bogdan ^a   Woodside, Murray ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Layered Queueing Networks; Scenarios; Software evaluation; Software performance; Software quality; UML; Use Case Maps

Indexed keywords

BLOCK CODES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EVALUATION; PETRI NETS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL; QUEUEING NETWORKS;

LAYERED QUEUEING NETWORKS; SCENARIOS; SOFTWARE EVALUATION; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE QUALITY; UML; USE CASE MAPS;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 16344380084     PISSN: 01665316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2004.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. D. Amyot, L. Charfl, N. Gorse, T. Gray, L. Logrippo, J. Sincennes, B. Stepien, and T. Ware Feature Description and Feature Interaction Analysis with Use Case Maps and LOTOS Sixth International Workshop on Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems (FIW'00) Glasgow, Scotland 2000
2. D. Amyot, L. Logrippo, R.J.A. Buhr, and T. Gray Use Case Maps for the capture and validation of Distributed Systems requirements Fourth International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'99) Limerick, Ireland 1999 June
3. D. Amyot, and G. Mussbacher On the extension of UML with Use Case Maps concepts The Third International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML2000) York, UK 2000 October
4. S. Balsamo, and M. Simeoni Deriving performance models from software architecture specifications European Simulation Multiconference 2001 (ESM 2001) Prague 2001 June
5. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson The Unified Modeling Language User Guide 1998 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
6. R.J.A. Buhr Use Case Maps as architectural entities for complex systems IEEE Transact. Software Eng. 24 12 1998 1131 1155
7. R.J.A. Buhr, and R.S. Casselman Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems 1996 Prentice Hall
8. J.M. Carroll Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions 2000 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
9. L. Constantine, and L. Lockwood Software for Use 1999 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
10. V. Cortellessa, and R. Mirandola Deriving a queueing network-based performance model from UML diagrams ACM Proceedings of the Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2000) Ottawa, Canada 2000 58 70
11. G. Franks, and M. Woodside Effectiveness of early replies in Client-Server Systems Perform. Eval. 36-37 1999 165 183 August
12. G. Franks, and M. Woodside Performance of Multi-level Client-Server Systems with Parallel Service Operations Proceedings of Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP98) Santa Fe 1998 120 130 October
13. Greg Franks, Performance Analysis of Distributed Server Systems, Report OCIEE-00-01, Ph.D. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, January 2000.
14. H. Gomaa, and D.A. Menasce Design and performance modeling of Component Interconnection Patterns for Distributed Software Architectures ACM Proceedings of the Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2000) Ottawa, Canada 2000 117 126
15. J. Hodges, and J. Visser Accelerating Wireless Intelligent Network Standards through Formal Techniques IEEE 1999 Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC'99) Houston 1999
16. C. Hofmeister, R. Nord, and D. Soni Applied Software Architecture 1999 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
17. ITU-T, Message Sequence Charts, ITU-T Recommendation Z. 120, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, November 1999.
18. I. Jacobson, M. Christerson, P. Jonsson, and G. Overgaard Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach 1992 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
19. P. Kahkipuro UML based performance modeling framework for Object Oriented Systems UML99, The Unified Modeling Language, Beyond the Standard, LNCS 1723 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin pp. 356-371
20. A. Miga, Application of Use Case Maps to System Design With Tool Support, M. Eng. Thesis, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 1998.
21. O. Monkewich, NEW QUESTION 12: URN: User Requirements Notation, ITU-T Study Group 10, Temporary Document 99, November 1999.
22. J.E. Neilson, C.M. Woodside, D.C. Petriu, and S. Majumdar Software bottle-necking in Client-Server Systems and Rendez-vous Networks IEEE Transact. Software Eng. 21 September 9 1995 776 782
23. Dorin B. Petriu, Layered Software Performance Models Constructed from Use Case Map Specifications, M.A.Sc. Thesis, Carleton University, May 2001.
24. D.B. Petriu, and M. Woodside Software performance models from system scenarios in Use Case Maps Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Modeling Tools and Techniques for Computer and Communication System Performance Evaluation (Performance TOOLS 2002) London, April 2002
25. D.B. Petriu, and C.M. Woodside Evaluating the performance of software architectures The Fifth Mitel Workshop (MICON2000) Mitel Networks, Ottawa 2000 August
26. Dorin B. Petriu, Daniel Amyot, Murray Woodside, Scenario-based Performance Engineering with UMCNav, SDL Forum 2003. Stuttgart, July 2003.
27. D.C. Petriu, C. Shousha, and A. Jalnapurkar Architecture-based performance analysis applied to a telecommunication system IEEE Transact. Software Eng. 26 November 11 2000 1049 1065
28. D.C. Petriu, and C.M. Woodside Performance analysis with UML B. Selic L. Lavagno G. Martin UML for Real 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers 221 240
29. R. Pooley Software engineering and performance: a roadmap The Future of Software Engineering, part of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2000) Limerick, Ireland 2000 189 200 June
30. J.A. Rolia, and K.C. Sevcik The method of layers IEEE Transact. Software Eng. 21 8 1995 682 688
31. C. Scratchley, and C.M. Woodside Evaluating Concurrency Options in Software Specifications Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecomm Systems (MASCOTS99) College Park, MD 1999 330 338 October
32. Object Management Group (OMG), UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification, OMG document ptc/02-03-02 (adopted standard), March 2002.
33. K.H. Siddiqui, and C.M. Woodside Performance-aware software development (PASD) using Resource Demand Budgets Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Software and Performance Rome 2002 275 285 July
34. C.U. Smith Performance Engineering of Software Systems 1990 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
35. C.U. Smith, and L.G. Williams Performance Solutions 2000 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
36. C.U. Smith, Murray Woodside, Performance Validation at Early Stages of Development, Position paper, Performance 99, Istanbul, Turkey, October 1999.
37. R. Wirfs-Brock, B. Wilkerson, and L. Wiener Designing Object-Oriented Software 1990 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
38. C.M. Woodside, J.E. Neilson, D.C. Petriu, and S. Majumdar The Stochastic Rendezvous Network Model for performance of synchronous Client-Server-like Distributed Software IEEE Transact. Computers 44 January (1) 1995 20 34
39. M. Woodside Software Resource Architecture Int. J. Software Eng. Knowledge Eng. (IJSEKE) 11 4 2001 407 429
40. J. Xu, M. Woodside, Dorina Petriu, Performance Analysis of a Software Design using the UML profile for schedulability, performance and time, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Performance Evaluation, Modelling Techniques and Tools (TOOLS 2003), Urbana, IL, USA, September, pp. 291-310, vol. LNCS 2794, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
41. ACM Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 98), Santa Fe, USA, October 1998.
42. ACM Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2000), Ottawa, Canada, September 2000.
43. ACM Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2002), Rome, Italy, July 2002.