Retained rear-tip extenders in redo penile prosthesis surgery: A case for heightened suspicion and thorough physical examination

Journal of Sexual Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 149-150

  Ilbeigi, Pedram ^a,b   Sadeghi Nejad, Hossein ^a   Kim, Michelle ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Exenders; Infection; Male penile prosthesis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PUS; RECURRENT INFECTION; REOPERATION; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

EID: 16344369892     PISSN: 17436095     EISSN: 17436109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20116.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Carson CC. Penile prosthesis implantation and infection for Sexual Medicine Society of North America. Int J Impot Res 2001;13(suppl 5):S35-8.
2. Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 1996;156:402-4.
3. Mulcahy JJ. Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol 2000;163:481-2.
4. Rajpurkar A, Shah R, Starkman J, Dhabuwala CB. Tissue ingrowth in penile implants and its effect on repeat penile surgery. Int J Impot Res 2004;16:203-6.