Tissue ingrowth in penile implants and its effect on repeat penile surgery

International Journal of Impotence Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 203-206

  Rajpurkar, A ^a   Shah, R ^b   Starkman, J ^a   Dhabuwala, C B ^a,c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LILAVATI HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^c HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Gore tex sleeve; Mechanical failure; Penile implant; Tissue ingrowth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; MALE; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TISSUE GROWTH; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE IMPLANTATION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PENIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 2342640983     PISSN: 09559930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901217     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Urology 1973; 2: 80-82.
2. Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Five year follow up of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with the semi-rigid penile prosthesis. J Urol 1988; 140: 1428-1430.
3. Nickas ME, Kessler R, Kabalin JN. Long-term experience with controlled expansion cylinders in the AMS 700 CX inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with earlier versions of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1994; 44: 400-403.
4. Daitch JA et al. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses; comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders. J Urol 1997; 159: 1400-1402.
5. Dubocq F et al. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival. Urology 1998; 52: 277-281.
6. Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE, AMS 700CX study group. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700 CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. J Urol 2000; 164: 376-380.
7. Wilson SK, Cleves M, Delk JR. Comparison of mechanical reliability of original and enhanced Mentor Alpha 1 penile prosthesis. J Urol 1999; 162: 715-718.
8. Fishman IJ, Scott FB, Light GK. Experience with inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1984; 23(Suppl): 86-88.
9. Gadacz TR, Chase JA, Duke S. Technology of prosthetic material. Semin Laparosc Surg 1994; 1: 123-127.
10. Batniji RK et al. Tissue response to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and silicone implants in a rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002; 4: 111-113.
11. Martakos P, Karwoski T. Healing characteristics of hybrid and conventional poytetrafluoroethylene vascular grafts. ASAIO J 1995; 41: M735-M741.
12. Ketharanathan V, Christie BA. Glutaraldehyde tanned ovine collagen compared with polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) as a conduit for small caliber artery substitution: an experimental study in dogs. Aust NZ J Surg 1981; 51: 556-561.
13. Mulcahy JJ. Editorial comment. J Urol 2002; 167: 1186.