An analysis of 0+ barbel (Barbus barbus) response to discharge fluctuations in a flume

River Research and Applications

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 421-438

  Vilizzi, Lorenzo ^a,b   Copp, Gordon H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b CEFAS ^*  (Italy)

^c CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ARIMA; Hierarchy theory; Individual based models; Intervention analysis; PHABSIM; River flow

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; DISCHARGE;

BARBUS BARBUS;

EID: 16344362861     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.806     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allouche S, Thevenet A, Gaudin P. 1999. Habitat use by chub (Leuciscus cephalus) in a large river, the French Upper Rhone, as determined by radiotelemetry. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 145 : 219-236.
2. Armstrong JD, Braithwaite VA, Fox M. 1998. The response of wild Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr to acute reductions in water flow. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 292-297.
3. Baras E. 1992. Etude des stratégies d'occupation du temps et de l'espace chez le barbeau fluviatile, Barbus barbus (L.). Cahiers d'Ethologie collection enquêes et dossiers n°16 12 (2-3): 218.
4. Baras E, Nindaba J. 2000. Diel dynamics of habitat use by riverine young-of-the-year Barbus barbus and Chondrostoma nasus (Cyprinidae). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 146: 431-448.
5. Baras E, Nindaba J, Philippart JC. 1995. Microhabitat used in a 0+ rheophilous cyprinid assemblage: quantitative assessment of community structure and fish density. Bulletin Français de Pêche et Pisciculture 337/338/339: 241-247.
6. Bischoff AB, Freyhof J. 1999. Seasonal shifts in day-time resource use of 0+ barbel, Barbus barbus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56 : 199-212.
7. Bischoff AB, Scholten M. 1996. Diurnal distribution patterns of 0+ barbel Barbus barbus in two different types of habitats in the River Sieg, Germany. Folia Zoologica 45(Suppl. 1): 13-20.
8. Borgestøom R, Løkensgard T. 1984. Influence of discharge and stream gradient on fish community composition in the regulated river Glama, Norway. In Regulated Rivers, Lillehammer A, Saltveit SJ (eds). Universitetsforlaget AS: Oslo; 341-350.
9. Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J, Henriksen J. 1998. Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004. http:// www.fort.usgs.gov/products/pubs/3910/3910.asp.
10. Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. 1994. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
11. Bradford MJ. 1997. An experimental study of stranding of juvenile salmonids on gravel bars and in side channels during rapid flow decreases. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 395-401.
12. Bunt CM, Cooke SJ, Katopodis C, McKinley RS. 1999. Movement and summer habitat of brown trout (Salmo trutta) below a pulsed discharge hydroelectric generating station. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15: 395-403.
13. Copp GH. 1992. Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a lotic floodplain channel. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33: 181-193.
14. Copp GH, Cellot B. 1988. Drift of embryonic and larval fishes, especially Lepomis gibbosus (L.), in the Upper Rhaône River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 4: 419-424.
15. Copp GH, Guti G, Rovný B, Černý J. 1994. Hierarchical analysis of habitat use by 0+ juvenile fish in the Hungarian/Slovak flood plain of the River Danube. Environmental Biology of Fishes 40: 329-348.
16. Copp GH, Edmonds-Brown VR, Cottey R. 1998. Behavioural interactions and microhabitat use of stream-dwelling sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pungitius pungitius in the laboratory and field. Folia Zoologica 47: 275-286.
17. Copp GH, Doherty S, Faulkner H, Watkins MS, Majecki J. 2002. Diel drift behaviour of fish eggs and larvae, in particular barbel, Barbus barbus (L.), in an English chalk stream. Fisheries Management and Ecology 9: 95-104.
18. David BO, Closs GP. 2002. Behavior of a stream-dwelling fish before, during, and after high-discharge events. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 762-771.
19. Debowski P, Beall E. 1995. Influence of dewatering on movements and distribution of salmon parr (Salmo salar L.) in relation to habitat characteristics in an experimental stream. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 337/338/ 339: 267-275.
20. Diggle PJ. 1990. Time Series: A Biostatistical Introduction. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
21. Flodmark LEW, Urke HA, Halleraker JH, Arnekleiv JV, Vøllestad LA, Poléo ABS. 2002. Cortisol and glucose responses in juvenile brown trout subjected to a fluctuating flow regime in an artificial stream. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 238-248.
22. Fredrich F, Ohmann S, Curio B, Kirschbaum F. 2003. Spawning migrations of the chub in the River Spree, Germany. Journal of Fish Biology 63: 710-723.
23. Garner P. 1996. Microhabitat use and diet of 0+ cyprinid fishes in a lentic, regulated reach of the River Great Ouse, UK. Journal of Fish Biology 48:367-382.
24. Garner P. 1997. Effects of variable discharge on the velocity use and shoaling behaviour of Phoxinus phoxinus. Journal of Fish Biology 50: 1214-1220.
25. Gibbins CN, Acornley RM. 2000. Salmonid habitat modelling studies and their contribution to the development of an ecologically acceptable release policy for Kielder Reservoir, north-east England. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16: 203-224.
26. Gibbins CN, Moir HJ, Webb JH, Soulsby C. 2002. Assessing discharge use by spawning Atlantic salmon: a comparison of discharge electivity indices and PHABSIM simulations. River Research and Applications 18: 383-395.
27. Giske J, Huse G, Fiksen Ø. 1998. Modelling spatial dynamics of fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8: 57-91.
28. Glass GV, Willson VL, Gottman JM. 1975. Design and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments. Colorado Associated University Press: Boulder, Colorado.
29. Gozlan RE. 1998. Environmental biology of the sofie Chondrostoma toxostoma. (Cyprinidae), with emphasis on early development. PhD thesis, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield.
30. Gozlan R, Mastrorillo S, Dauba F, Tourenq JN, Copp GH. 1998. Multi-scale analysis of habitat use by 0+ fishes during late summer in the River Garonne (France). Aquatic Sciences 59: 1-19.
31. Heggenes J. 1996. Habitat selection by brown trout (Salmo trutta) and young Atlantic salmon (S. salar) in streams: static and dynamic hydraulic modelling. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 155-169.
32. Hohausová E, Copp GH, Jankovsky P. 2003. Movement of fish between a river and its backwater: diel activity and relation to environmental gradients. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 107-117.
33. Huntingford FA, Aird D, Joiner P, Thorpe KE, Braithwaite VA, Armstrong JD. 1999. How juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., respond to falling water levels: experiments in an artificial stream. Fisheries Management and Ecology 6: 357-364.
34. Huse G. 2001. Modelling habitat choice in fish using adapted random walk. Sarsia 86: 477-483.
35. Hvidsten NA. 1985. Mortality of pre-smolt Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, Salmo trutta L., caused by fluctuating water levels in the regulated River Nidelva, central Norway. Journal of Fish Biology 27: 711-718.
36. Jurajda P. 1998. Drift of larval and juvenile fishes, especially Rhodeus sericeus and Rutilus rutilus, in the River Morava (Danube basin). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 141: 231-241.
37. Jurajda P, Reichard M, Hohausová E, Černý J. 2001. Comparison of 0+ fish communities between regulated-channelized and floodplain stretches of the River Morava. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 135 : 187-202.
38. Kemp PS, Gilvear DJ, Armstrong JD. 2003. Do juvenile atlantic salmon parr track local changes in water velocity? River Research and Applications 19: 569-575.
39. Kirk RE. 1995. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd edn). Brooks/Cole Publishing Company: Pacific Grove, California.
40. Lamouroux N, Capra H. 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for target fish populations. Freshwater Biology 47: 1543-1556.
41. Matheney MP, Rabeni CF. 1995. Patterns of movements and habitat use by hog suckers in an Ozark stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124: 886-897.
42. Matthews WJ. 1997. Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology. Chapman & Hall: London.
43. McDowall D, McCleary R, Meidinger EE, Hay RA, Jr. 1980. Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, California.
44. Nicolas Y, Pont D. 1995. Importance d'annexes laterals artificielles pour le recrutement en juveniles de poisons dans un fleuve aménagé, le Bas-Rhône. Bulletin Français de Pêche et Pisciculture 337/338/339: 249-257.
45. O'Brien RG, Kaiser MK. 1985. MANOVA method for analysing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin 97: 316-333.
46. Pert EJ, Erman DC. 1994. Habitat use by adult rainbow trout under moderate artificial fluctuations in flow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 123: 913-923.
47. Poizat G, Pont D. 1996. Multi-scale approach to species-habitat relations: juvenile fish in a large river section. Freshwater Biology 36: 611-622.
48. Railsback SF. 2001. Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling. Ecological Modelling 139: 47-62.
49. Railsback SF, Harvey BC. 2002. Analysis of habitat selection rules using an individual-based model. Ecology 83: 1817-1830.
50. Railsback SF, Lamberson RH, Harvey BC, Duffy WE. 1999. Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecological Modelling 123: 73-89.
51. Railsback SF, Harvey BC, Lamberson RH, Lee DE, Claasen NJ, Yoshihara S. 2002. Population-level analysis and validation of an individual-based cutthroat trout model. Natural Resource Modeling 15: 83-110.
52. Ropella GE, Railsback SF, Jackson SK. 2002. Software engineering considerations for individual-based models. Natural Resource Modeling 15: 5-22.
53. Roussel J-M, Bardonnet A, Claude A. 1999. Microhabitats of brown trout when feeding on drift and when resting in a lowland salmonid brook: effects on Weighted Usable Area. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 146: 413-429.
54. Saltveit SJ, Halleraker JH, Arnekleiv JV, Harby A. 2001. Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon and brown trout during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 609-622.
55. Sannomiya N, Matuda K. 1987. Least squares parameter estimation in fish behavior model. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 53: 1951-1957.
56. Schmutz S, Jungwirth M. 1999. Fish as indicators of large river connectivity: the Danube and its tributaries. Archiv für Hydrobiologie (Suppl.) 115/3: 329-348.
57. Scruton DA, Ollerhead LMN, Clarke KD, Pennell C, Alfredsen K, Harby A, Kelley D. 2003. The behavioural response of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) to experimental hydropeaking on a Newfoundland (Canada) river. River Research and Applications 19: 577-587.
58. Shirvell CS. 1994. Effect of changes in streamflow on the microhabitat use and movements of sympatric juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) in a natural stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51 : 1644-1652.
59. Tyler JA, Rose KA. 1994. Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 4: 91-123.
60. Underwood AJ. 1991. Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42: 569-587.
61. Valentin S, Sempeski P, Souchon Y, Gaudin P. 1994. Short-term habitat use by young grayling, Thymallus thymallus L., under variable flow conditions in an experimental stream. Fisheries Management and Ecology 1: 57-65.
62. Valentin S, Lauters F, Sabaton C, Breil P, Souchon Y. 1996. Modelling temporal variations of physical habitat for brown trout (Salmo trutta) in hydropeaking conditions. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 317-330.
63. Van Winkle W, Rose KA, Chambers RC. 1993, Individual-based approach to fish populations dynamics. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122: 397-403.
64. Vehanen T, Bjerke PL, Heggenes J, Huusko A, Mäki-Petäys A. 2000. Effect of fluctuating flow and temperature on cover type selection and behavior by juvenile brown trout in flumes. Journal of Fish Biology 56: 923-937.
65. Vilizzi L, Copp GH, 2001. Behavioural responses of 0+ barbel in an artificial stream: distribution and velocity use. Animal Behaviour 61: 645-654.
66. Vilizzi L, Copp GH, Roussel J-M. 2004. Assessing variation in suitability curves and electivity profiles in temporal studies of fish habitat use. River Research and Applications 20: 605-618.
67. Watkins MS, Doherty S, Copp GH. 1997. Microhabitat use by 0+ and older fishes in a small English chalk stream. Journal of Fish Biology 50: 1010-1024.
68. Wu J, David JL. 2002. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecological Modelling 153: 7-26.