Sensory evaluation based on verbal judgments

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 79-95

  Urdapilleta, Isabel ^a   Tijus, Charles Albert ^a   Nicklaus, Sophie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 0033245085     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1999.tb00106.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A.F.N.O.R. ISO/CD 13299. 1992. Analyse sensorielle: methodologie. Directives generales pour l'etablissement d'un profil sensoriel.
2. A.F.N.O.R.V00-150. 1988. Analyse sensorielle- Vocabulaire.
3. ANDERSON, J.R. 1991. The adaptative nature of human categorization. Psych. Rev. 98, 409-429.
4. BARTHELEMY, J. 1990. Evaluation d'une grandeur sensorielle complexe: description quantifiee. In Evaluation sensorielle, manuel methodologique. Technique et documentation, APRIA, Paris.
5. BATEN, W. D. 1946. Organoleptic tests pertaining to apples and pears. Food Res. 11, 84-94.
6. BORNSTEIN, M.H. 1987. Perceptual categories in vision and audition. In Categorial perception, (Stevan Harnad, ed.) pp. 287-300.
7. BOUTON, P.E., FORD, A.L. HARRIS, P.V. and SHAW, F.D. 1980. Electrical stimulation of beef sides. Meat Sci. 80, 41-45.
8. BRIEN, J.C., MAY, P. and MAYO, O. 1987. Analysis of judge performance in wine-quality evaluation. J. Food Sci. 52 (5), 1273-1279.
9. DAWSON, E.H. and HARRIS, B.L. 1951. Sensory methods for measuring differences in food quality. Agr. Info. Bull. N°34, US Dept of Agric., Washington, DC.
10. ESCOFIER, B. and PAGÈS, J. 1990. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples, objectifs, methodes et interprétation. Bordas, Paris.
11. GALVEZ, F.C.F. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 1990. Comparison of three descriptive analysis scaling methods for the sensory evaluation of noodle. J. Sensory Studies 5, 251-263.
12. GARNER, R.A. and GAMER, B.T. 1970. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee, Science 165, 664-672.
13. GIOVANNI, M.E. and PANGBORN, R.M. 1983. Measurement of taste intensity and degree of liking of beverages by graphic scales and magnitude estimation. J. Food Science 48, 1175-1182.
14. HARRIES, J.M., RHODES, D.N. and CHRYSTALL, B.B. 1972. Meat texture: Subjective assessment of the texture of cooked beef. J. Texture Studies 3, 101.
15. LAKOFF, G. 1987. Woman, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
16. LARMOND, E., MEILGAARD, M., POWERS, J.J., SIDEL, J., SCHUTZ, H. and WORD, K. 1981. Panel discussion: How far can we trust taste panel result? Tech. Quart. Master Brewers Assoc. Of the Americas 18 (1), 36-41, 81.
17. LAWLESS, H.T. and MALONE, G.J. 1986a. The discriminative efficiency of common scaling methods. J. Sensory Studies 1, 85-98.
18. LAWLESS, H.T. and MALONE, G.J. 1986b. A comparison of rating scales: sensitivity, replicates and relative measurement. J. Sensory Studies 1, 155-174.
19. LIBERMAN, A.M., HARRIS, K.S., HOFFMAN, H.S. and GRIFFITH, B.C. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J. Exp. Psych. 61, 379-388.
20. MACFIE, H. and BRATCHELL, N. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
21. MCDANIEL, M.R. and SAWYER, F.M. 1981. Descriptive analysis of whiskey sour formulations: magnitude estimation versus a 9-point category scale. J. Food Sci. 46, 178-189.
22. MCTIGUE, M.C., KOEHLER, H.H. and SILBERNAGEL, M.J. 1989. Comparison of four sensory evaluation methods for assessing cooked dry bean flavor. J. Food Sci. 545, 1278-1283.
23. PANGBORN, R.M., GUINARD, P. andMEISELMAN, H.L. 1990. Evaluation of bitterness of caffeine in hot chocolate drink by category, graphic and ratio scaling. J. Sensory Studies 4, 31-53.
24. PEYRAM, D.R. and GIRARDOT, N.F. 1952. Advanced taste method. Food Eng 24, 58-61.
25. ROTH, L. and BRUCE, V. 1995. Perception and Representation, Current Issues. The Open University, USA.
26. SHAND, P.J., HAWRYSH, Z.J., HARDIN, R.T. and JEREMIAH, L.E. 1985. Descriptive sensory analysis of beef steaks by category scaling, line scaling and magnitude estimation. J. Food Sci. 50, 495-500.
27. STEVENS, S.S. and GALANTER, E.H. 1957. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. J. Exp. Psych. 54, 377-411.
28. STONE, H., SIDEL, J.L. and BLOOMQUIST, X. 1980. Quantitative descriptive analysis. Cereal Food World 25, 642-644.
29. URDAPILLETA, I. 1998. "Catégorisation et l'implication de propriétes.", These de Doctorat de Psychologie, Universite, Paris VIII.
30. URDAPILLETA, I. and BARTHELEMY, J. 1996. "Petit guide de formation á l'usage des animateurs de formation; ou comment optimiser la formation des juges en vue d'analyses descriptives quantitatives". Laboratoire d'évaluation sensorielle. Nestle-France.
31. WHORF, B.J. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality. MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons, New York.