Measurement of white lesions surrounding orthodontic brackets: Captured slides vs digital camera images

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 226-230

  Benson, Philip Edward ^a   Shah, Anwar Ali ^a   Willmot, Derrick Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Demineralization; Image analysis; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMINERALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEUKOPLAKIA; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ORTHODONTICS;

EID: 16244417520     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benson PE, Pender N, Higham SM. Enamel demineralization assessed by computerised image analysis of clinical photographs. J Dent. 2000;28:319-326.
2. Willmot DR, Benson PE, Pender N, Brook AH. Reproducibility of quantitative measurement of white enamel demineralization by image analysis. Caries Res. 2000;34:175-181.
3. Henricsson M, Karlsson C, Ekholm L, Kaikkonen P, Sellman A, Steffert E, Tyrberg M. Color slides or digital photography in diabetes screening - a comparison. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:164-168.
4. Musadiq M, Patsoura E, Hughes S, Yang YC. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems. Eye. 2003;17:619-622.
5. van Leeuwen R, Chakravarthy U, Vingerling JR, Brussee C, Hooghart AJ, Mulder PG, de Jong PT. Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: is digital imaging as good as 35 mm film? Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1540-1544.
6. Sandler PJ, Murray AM, Bearn D. Digital records in orthodontics. Dent Update. 2002;29:18-24.
7. Benson PE, Pender N, Higham SM. Quantifying enamel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets - a comparison of two methods. Part 1: repeatability and agreement. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:149-158.
8. Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: A practical Approach. Chichester, NY: Wiley; 1983, 190.
9. Benson PE, Pender N, Higham SM. Quantifying enamel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets - a comparison of two methods. Part 2: validity. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:159-165.
10. Fleiss JL. Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, NY: Wiley; 1986, 1-32.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160.
12. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
13. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1991, 410-411.
14. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1987;6:441-448.
15. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Grondahl HG. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81:351-355.
16. Eraso FE, Analoui M, Watson AB, Rebeschini R. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:621-625.