Quantifying enamel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets - A comparison of two methods. Part 2: Validity

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 159-165

  Benson, Philip E ^a,c   Pender, Neil ^b   Higham, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIGHT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OPTICS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE; VALIDATION STUDY;

DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIGHT; OPTICS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 0038826583     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.2.159     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Al-Khateeb S et al. 1997 Quantification of formation and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions with a new portable fluorescence device. Advances in Dental Research 11: 502-506
2. Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg C M, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Månsson B 1998 A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 595-602
3. Altman D G 1991 Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 409-419
4. Angmar-Månsson B, ten Bosch J J 1987 Optical methods for the detection and quantification of caries. Advances in Dental Research 1: 14-20
5. Årtun J, Brobakken B O 1986 Prevalence of carious white spot lesions after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 229-234
6. Goreleick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J 1982 Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 93-98
7. Haynes R B 1981 How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Canadian Medical Association Journal 124: 703-710
8. Mizrahi E 1982 Enamel demineralisation following orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 62-66
9. Mizrahi E 1983 Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 323-331
10. Nunn J H, Murray J J, Reynolds P, Tabari D, Breckon J 1992 The prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in 15-16-year-old children residing in three districts (natural fluoride, adjusted fluoride, low fluoride) in the north east of England. Community Dental Health 9: 235-247
11. Øgaard B 1989 Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19 year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 423-427
12. Schäfer F, Raven S J, Parr T A 1992 The effect of lesion characteristic on remineralization and model sensitivity. Journal of Dental Research 71: 811-813