Cognitive neurology from a psychometric perspective;Psychometrische aspekte der kognitiven neurologie

Aktuelle Neurologie

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 86-93

  Kopp, B ^a,b   Wessel, K ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROSCIENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMETRY; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 16244416513     PISSN: 03024350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-828407     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Lienert GA, Raatz U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. 5. Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz, 1994
2. Steyer R, Eid M. Messen und Testen. Berlin: Springer, 1993
3. Engel RR, Satzger W. Psychologische Testdiagnostik. In: Möller HJ, Laux G, Kapfhammer HP (Hrsg): Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 412-438
4. rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
5. Mitrushina M, Boone K, D'Elia L. Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999
6. nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998
7. Cramon DY von, Mai N, Ziegler W. Neuropsychologische Diagnostik. Weinheim: Chapman & Hall, 1993
8. Goldenberg G. Neuropsychologie. Grundlagen, Klinik, Rehabilitation. 3. Auflage. München: Urban & Fischer, 2002
9. Hartje W, Poeck K. Klinische Neuropsychologie. 5. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2002
10. Karnath HO, Thier P. Neuropsychologie. Berlin: Springer, 2003
11. Sturm W, Herrmann M, Wallesch C-W. Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000
12. nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000
13. rd edition. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill, 1994
14. Charter RA. Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999; 21: 559-566
15. Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP). Version 1.7. Herzogenrath: Psytest, 2002
16. Merten T. Fragen der neuropsychologischen Diagnostik bei Simulationsverdacht. Fortschr Neurol Psychiat 2002; 70: 126-138
17. Meyer GJ, Finn SE, Eyde LD et al. Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist 2001; 56: 128-165
18. Szolovits P. Uncertainty and decisions in medical informatics. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 111-121
19. Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Cerhan JH et al. Understanding the diagnostic capabilities of cognitive tests. Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 15: 114-124
20. Sackett DL, Haynes RB. The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ 2002; 324: 539-541
21. Hasselblad V, Hedges LV. Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychol Bull 1995; 117: 167-178
22. Swets JA. The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist 1992; 47: 522-532
23. Swets JA, Dawes RM, Monahan J. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2000; 1: 1-26
24. Baldessarini RJ, Finklestein S, Arana GW. The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40: 569-573
25. Glaros AG, Kline RB. Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model. J Clin Psychol 1988; 44: 1013-1023
26. Meehl PE, Rosen A. Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychol Bull 1955; 52: 194-216
27. nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988
28. Maxwell SE. Dependent variable reliability and determination of sample size. Appl Psychol Measurement 1980; 4: 253-260
29. Zimmerman DW, Williams RH. Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests. Psychol Bull 1986; 100: 123-124
30. Buchner A, Wippich W. On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cognit Psychol 2000; 40: 227-259
31. Schacter DL. Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987; 13: 501-518
32. Warrington EK, Weiskrantz L. Amnesic syndrome: consolidation or retrieval? Nature 1970; 14: 628-630
33. Meier B, Perrig WJ. Low reliability of perceptual priming: consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory. QJ Exp Psychol A 2000; 53: 211-233
34. Chapman LJ, Chapman JP. Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit. Psychol Bull 1973; 79: 380-385
35. Miller EN, Fujioka TA, Chapman LJ, Chapman JP. Psychometrically matched tasks for assessment of hemispheric asymmetries of function. Brain Cogn 1995; 28: 1-13
36. Mungas D, Reed BR, Kramer JH. Psychometrically matched measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function for assessment of cognitive decline in older persons. Neuropsychology 2003; 7: 380-392
37. American Psychological Association. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999
38. Hacker H, Leutner D, Amelang M. Standards für pädagogisches und psychologisches Testen. Bern: Huber, 1998
39. Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). DIN 33430. Ausgabe 2002-06. Anforderungen an Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei berufsbezogenen Eignungsbeurteilungen. Berlin: Beuth, 2002
40. nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000: 277-299
41. Turner SM, DeMers ST, Fox HR, Reed GM. APA's guidelines for test user qualifications. American Psychologist 2001; 56: 1099-1113
42. American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: Neuropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists. Neurology 1996; 47: 592-599
43. Reynolds CR. Commentary on the American Academy of Neurology report on neuropsychological assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 199-200
44. Hartlage LC. Neuropsychological testing of adults: further considerations for neurologists. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 201-213
45. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Critical evaluation of "Assessment: neuropsychological testing of adults". Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 215-226