Character complexity and redundancy in writing systems over human history

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1560, 2005, Pages 267-275

  Changizi, Mark A ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Character recognition; Complexity; Letter perception; Reading; Redundancy; Writing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARACTER; HISTORY; LANGUAGE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NATURAL SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; WRITING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; SELECTION (GENETICS); WRITING;

EID: 16244393711     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2942     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ager, S. 1998 Omniglot: a guide to writing systems. See http:// www.omniglot.com.
2. Chakravarty, I. 1979 A generalized line and junction labeling scheme with applications to scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intell. 1, 202-205.
3. Changizi, M. A. 2001 Universal scaling laws for hierarchical complexity in languages, organisms, behaviors and other combinatorial systems. J. Theor. Biol. 211, 277-295.
4. Changizi, M. A. 2003a The relationship between number of muscles, behavioral repertoire, and encephalization in mammals. J. Theor. Biol. 220, 157-168.
5. Changizi, M. A. 2003b The brain from 25 000 feet: high level explorations of brain complexity, perception, induction and vagueness. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Changizi, M. A., McDannald, M. A. & Widders, D. 2002 Scaling of differentiation in networks: nervous systems, organisms, ant colonies, ecosystems, businesses, universities, cities, electronic circuits, and Legos. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 215-237.
7. Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H. & Shimojo, S. 2004 The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. (Submitted.)
8. Chen, Y. P., Allport, D. A. & Marshall, J. C. 1996 What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: the stroke or the stroke pattern? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Hum. Exp. Psychol. 49, 1024-1043.
9. Clowes, M. B. 1971 On seeing things. Artificial Intell. 2, 79-116.
10. Daniels, P. T. & Bright, B. 1996 The world's writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Dehaene, S. 1997 The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
12. Huffman, D. A. 1971 Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. In Machine intelligence, vol. 6 (ed. B. Meltzer & D. Michie), pp. 295-323. New York: Elsevier.
13. Ifrah, G. 1985 From one to zero: a universal history of numbers. New York: Viking Press.
14. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B. & Moore, D. C. 2004 Identifying letters. Vision Res. (In the press.)
15. Trick, L. M. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1994 Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity pre-attentive stage in vision. Psychol. Rev. 101, 80-102.
16. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. 2001 Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Pscyhol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 92-114.
17. Yeh, S. L. & Li, J. L. 2004 Sublexical processing in visual recognition of Chinese characters: evidence from repetition blindness for subcharacter components. Brain and Language 88, 47-53.
18. Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. 1995 The representation of numbers. Cognition 57, 271-295.