Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching

Online and CDROM Review

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 271-279

  Spink, Amanda ^a   Greisdorf, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; FUZZY SETS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SET THEORY;

BINARY DECISION; USERS PARTIAL RELEVANCE JUDGEMENTS;

ONLINE SEARCHING;

EID: 0031240736     PISSN: 13532642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb024631     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BATES, M.J. (1996) Document familiarity, relevance and Bradford's Law: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 5, Information Processing and Management, 32(6), 697-707.
2. BOOKSTEIN, A. (1997) Infometric distributions. III. Ambiguity and randomness, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(1), 2-10.
3. EISENBERG, M.B. (1988) Measuring relevance judgments, Information Processing and Management, 24(4), 373-389.
4. EISENBERG, M.B. and X. HU (1987) Dichotomous relevance judgments and the evaluation of information systems, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 66-70.
5. ELLIS, D. (1989) A behavioral approach to information retrieval systems design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171-212.
6. HARMAN, D. (1992) Relevance feedback revisited, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, June 21-24, pp. 1-10.
7. INGWERSEN, P. and P. BORLUND (1996) Information transfer as interactive cognitive processes, Proceedings of COLIS 2: Second International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, October 13-16, 1996; Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 219-232.
8. KUHLTHAU, C.C. (1994) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Science, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.
9. KUHLTHAU, C.C., A. SPINK and C. COOL (1992) Exploration into stages in the information search process in online information retrieval: communication between users and intermediaries, Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 29, October 1992, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 67-71.
10. PAO, M.L. (1993) Term and citation retrieval: a field study, Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 95-112.
11. REGAZZI, J.J. (1988) Performance measures for information retrieval systems: an experimental approach, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(4), 235-251.
12. ROBERTSON, S.E. and M. HANCOCK-BEAULIEU (1992) On the evaluation of IR systems, Information Processing and Management, 28(4), 457-466.
13. RORVIG, M.E. (1988) Psychometric measurement and information retrieval, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 23, 157-189.
14. SARACEVIC, T. (1995) Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval, Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGIR International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Association of Computing Machinery, Seattle, WA, pp. 138-146.
15. SARACEVIC, T. (1996a) Interactive models in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal, Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 3-9.
16. SARACEVIC, T. (1996b) Relevance reconsidered, Proceedings of COLIS 2: Second International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Informalion Science: Integration in Perspective, October 13-16, 1996: Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 201-218.
17. SARACEVIC, T., P.B. KANTOR, A.Y. CHAMIS and D. TRIVISON (1988) A study of information seeking and retrieving: Part I. Background and methodology, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 161-176
18. SARACEVIC, T. and L. SU (1990) Modeling and measuring the user-intermediary-computer interaction in online searching, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 75-80.
19. SCHAMBER, L. (1994) Relevance and information behavior, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 3-48.
20. SPINK, A. (1996) A multiple search session model of end-user behavior: an exploratory study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(8), 603-609.
21. SPINK, A. (1997) A study of interactive feedback during mediated online searching, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 382-394.
22. SPINK, A. and J. BATEMAN (1996) Interactive information retrieval and relevance: an information seeking approach. Unpublished paper. School of Library and Information Science, University of North Texas.
23. SPINK, A., A. GOODRUM, D. ROBINS and M.M. WU (1996) Elicitations during information retrieval: implications for design, Proceedings of the 19th International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1996, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 120-127.
24. SPINK, A. and R.M. LOSEE (1996) Feedback in information retrieval, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 33-78.
25. WILLIAMS. F.W. (1992) Reasoning With Statistics: How To Read Quantitative Research, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth.