Curriculum, assessment, and accountability in day treatment and residential schools

Exceptional Children

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 263-283

  Gagnon, Joseph Calvin ^a   Mclaughlin, Margaret J ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244373022     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290407000301     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Making standards matter 1999. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Baenen, R. S., Glenwick, D. S., Stephens, M. A. P., Neuhaus, S. M., & Mowrey, J. D. (1986). Predictors of child and family outcome in a psychoeducational day school program. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 272-279.
3. Carson, R. R., Sitlington, P. L., & Frank, A. R. (1995). Young adulthood for individuals with behavioral disorders: What does it hold? Behavioral Disorders, 20, 127-135.
4. Davis, M., & Cooper, D. K. (1998). Adult arrest records and court outcomes of adolescents with serious emotional disturbance. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), Child welfare and juvenile justice (pp. 335-338). Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research, Tampa, FL.
5. Doren, B., Bullis, M., & Benz, M. (1996). Predicting arrest status of adolescents with disabilities in transition. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 363-380.
6. Epstein, M. H., Foley, R. M., & Cullinan, D. (1992). National survey of educational programs for adolescents with serious emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders 17, 202-210.
7. Fink, A. (1995). How to design surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Fuhrman, S. H. (January 27, 1999). The new accountability. Policy Brief: Reporting Issues in Education Reform. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
9. Gagnon, J. C. (2002). Survey of teachers and principals in residential and day treatment schools for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International. 63(11a).
10. Gagnon, J. C., & Leone, P. E. (2003). Elementary day and residential schools for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: Characteristics of educators, and students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Gagnon, J. C., McLaughlin, M. J., Rhim, L. M., & Davis, G. (2002). Standards-driven reform policies at the local level: Report on a survey of local special education directors in large districts. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 15, 3-9.
12. Grosenick, J. K., George, M. P., & George, N. L. (1987). A profile of school programs for the behaviorally disordered: Twenty years after Morse, Cutler, and Fink. Behavioral Disorders, 12, 159-168.
13. Guy, B., Shin, H., Lee, S. Y., & Thurlow, M. L. (1999). State graduation requirements for students with and without disabilities (Tech. Rep. No. 24). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes
14. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., & Almond, P. (1998). Teachers' knowledge of accommodations as a validity issue in high-stakes testing. The Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 175-183.
16. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17. Title 20, U.S.C. 1400-1487; 111 Stat. 37-157.
17. Kauffman, J. M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth, (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Krueger, R. A. (1998). Developing questions for focus groups. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessment and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
20. Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Malmgren, Kimber, Edgar, Eugene, & Neel, Richard S. (1998). Postschool status of youths with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 257-63.
22. Market Data Retrieval. (2002). School Directory Database. Shelton, CT: Author.
23. McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one & all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
24. McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disability, journal of Educational Policy 17(4), 431-451.
25. Muscott, H. S. (1997). Behavioral characteristics of elementary and secondary students with emotional/behavioral disabilities in four different cascade placements. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 336-356.
26. No Child Left Behind Act. Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 2102(4) (2001).
27. Nolet, V, & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28. Norusis, M. J. (1997). SPSS 7.5 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Olson, J. E, Jones, I. A., & Bond, L. A. (2001). State student assessment programs: Annual survey. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
30. Sands, D. J., Adams, L., & Stout, D. M. (1995). A statewide exploration of the nature and use of curriculum in special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 68-83.
31. Silver, S. E., Duchnowski, A. J., Kutash, K., Friedman, R. M., Eisen, M., Prange, M. E., Brandenberg, N. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1992). A comparison of children with serious emotional disturbances served in residential and school settings. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 43-59.
32. Steinberg, Z., & Knitzer, J. (1992). Classrooms for emotionally and behaviorally disturbed students: Facing the challenge. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 145-156.
33. Thurlow, M. L., Elliott, J. L, & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34. Thurlow, M. L., Nelson, J. R., Teelucksingh, E., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2000). Where's Waldo? A third search far students with disabilities in state accountability reports (Tech. Rep. No. 25). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. http://education.umn.edu/ NCEO/OnlinePubs/TechReport25.html.
35. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2002a). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author
36. U.S. Department of Education. (2002b). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
37. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
38. U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
39. Wagner, M. (1995). Outcomes for youth with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood. Future of Children, 5(2), 90-113.
40. Weisberg, H. F., Krosnick, J. A., & Bowen, B. D. (1989). An introduction to survey research and data analysis (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
41. Wolf, P. J., & Hassel, B. C. (2001). Effectiveness and accountability (Part I): The compliance model, In C. E. Finn, Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson, Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 53-75). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.
42. Ysseldyke, J., & Bielinski, J. (2002). Effect of different methods of reporting and reclassification on trends in test scores for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 189-200.