Constant time delay and interspersal of known items to teach sight words to students with mental retardation and learning disabilities

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 179-191

  Knight, Melissa G ^a   Ross, Denise E ^a,b   Taylor, Ronald L ^a   Ramasamy, Rangasamy ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Health and Behavior Studies ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244365838     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Belfiore, P. J., Grskovic, J. A., & Murphy, A. M. (1996). The effects of antecedent color on reading for students with learning disabilities and co-occurring attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 432-438.
2. Belfiore, P.J., Skinner, C. H., & Ferkis, M. A. (1995). Effects of response and trial repetition on sight-word training for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 347-348.
3. Browder, D. M., & Minarovic, T. J. (2000). Utilizing sight words in self-instruction training for employees with moderate mental retardation in competitive jobs. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 78-89.
4. Browder, D. M., & Shear, S. (1996). Interspersal of known items in a treatment package to teach sight words to students with behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education, 29, 400-413.
5. Browder, D. M., & Xin, Y. P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130-153.
6. Collins, B. C., & Griffen, A. K. (1996). Teaching students with moderate disabilities to make safe responses to product warning labels. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 30-45.
7. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of 30% new items to 70% review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213-234.
8. Cooke, N. L., & Reichard, S. M. (1996). The effects of different interspersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124-142.
9. Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. A. (1990). Using constant time delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 54-59.
10. Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Ault, J. J., & Wiley, K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1-22.
11. Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270-85.
12. Godby, S., Gast, L., & Wolery, M. (1987). A comparison of time delay and system of least prompts in teaching object identification. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 283-306.
13. Keel, M. C., Slaton, D. B., & Blackhurst, A. E. (2001). Acquisition of content area vocabulary for students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 46-71.
14. Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). The use of constant time delay in teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 533-544.
15. Mosley, V. P., Flynt, S. W., & Morton, R. C. (1997). Teaching sight words to students with moderate mental retardation. Reading Improvement, 34, 2-7.
16. Palmer, B. C. (1986). Is the Dolch list of 220 sight words still relevant? Reading Improvement, 23, 227-230.
17. Schuster, J. W., Griffin, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Comparisons of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305-325.
18. Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1987). Effects of constant time delay procedure on the written spelling performance of a learning disabled student. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 9-16.
19. Stevens, K. B., Schuster, J. W., & Doak, P. K. (1990). Using constant time delay to teach word definitions. Journal of Special Education, 24, 306-318.
20. Uhry, J. K., & Shepard, M. J. (1997). Teaching phonological recoding to young children with phonological processing deficits: The effect on sight-vocabulary acquisition. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 104-25.
21. Wolery, M., Cybriwsky, C., Gast, D. L., & Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Use of constant time delay and attentional response with adolescents. Exceptional Children, 57, 462-474.