The role of salivary androgen-binding protein in reproductive isolation between two subspecies of house mouse: Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 349-361

  Bímová, Barbora ^a,b   Karn, Robert C ^c   Piálek, Jaroslav ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c BUTLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Hybrid zone; Prezygotic isolation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; RODENT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

BAVARIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; WORLD;

MUS MUSCULUS;

EID: 15944421449     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00439.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Aldhous P. 1989. The effects of individual cross-fostering on the development of intrasexual kin discrimination in male laboratory mice, Mus musculus L. Animal Behaviour 37: 741-750.
2. Benzekri K, Britton-Davidian J, Ganem G. 2002. Sexual preference between two chromosomal races of the house mouse (Rodentia, Muridae): a preliminary study comparing wild-caught parents and laboratory-born offspring. Folia Zoologica 51 (Suppl. 1): 15-22.
3. Beynon RJ, Hurst JL. 2003. Multiple roles of major urinary proteins in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Biochemical Society Transactions 31: 142-146.
4. Boursot P, Auffray J-C, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F. 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 119-152.
5. Božíková E, Munclinger P, Teeter KC, Tucker PK, Macholán M, Piálek J. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA in the hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus: a comparison of two transects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 363-378.
6. Britton-Davidian J, Fel-Clair F, Lopez J, Alibert P, Boursot P. 2005. Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 379-393.
7. Butlin R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: 8-13.
8. Butlin RK. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. In: Otte D, Endler JA, eds. Speciation and its consequence. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 158-179.
9. Christophe N, Baudoin C. 1998. Olfactory preferences in two strains of wild mice, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, and their hybrids. Animal Behaviour 56: 365-369.
10. Coyne JA. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
11. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 287-305.
12. Dlouhy SR, Karn RC. 1984. Multiple gene action determining a mouse salivary protein phenotype: identification of the structural gene for androgen-binding protein (Abp). Biochemical Genetics 22: 657-667.
13. Dlouhy SR, Nichols WC, Karn RC. 1986. Production of an antibody to mouse salivary androgen binding protein (ABP) and its use in identifying a prostate protein produced by a gene distinct from Abp. Biochemical Genetics 24: 743-763.
14. Dlouhy SR, Taylor BA, Karn RC. 1987. The genes for mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) subunits alpha and gamma are located on chromosome 7. Genetics 115: 535-543.
15. Dod B, Jermiin LS, Boursot P, Chapman VH, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F. 1993. Counterselection on sex chromosomes in the Mus musculus European hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6: 529-546.
16. Dod B, Smadja C, Karn RC, Boursot P. 2005. Testing for selection on the androgen-binding protein in the Danish mouse hybrid zone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 447-459.
17. Drickamer LC. 1992. Oestrus female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Animal Behaviour 43: 868-870.
18. Eklund A. 1996. The effects of inbreeding on aggression in wild male house mice (Mus domesticus). Behaviour 133: 883-901.
19. Fel-Clair F, Catalan J, Lenormand T, Britton-Davidian J. 1998. Centromeric incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mouse subspecies from Denmark: Evidence from patterns of NOR activity. Evolution 52: 592-603.
20. Felsenstein J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124-138.
21. Forejt J. 1996. Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends in Genetics 12: 412-417.
22. Ganem G, Ginane C, Ostrowski M-F, Orth A. 2005. Assessment of mate preference in the house mouse with reference to investigations on assortative mating. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 461-471.
23. Howard DJ. 1993. Reinforcement: the origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. New York: Oxford University Press, 46-69.
24. Hurst JL. 1988. A system for the individual recognition of small rodents at a distance, used in free-living and enclosed populations of house mice. Journal of Zoology 215: 363-367.
25. Hurst JL. 1990a. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Animal Behaviour 40: 209-222.
26. Hurst JL. 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Animal Behaviour 40: 223-232.
27. Hurst JL. 1990c. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes. Animal Behaviour 40: 233-243.
28. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries KE, Robertson DHL, Cavaggioni A, Beynon RJ. 2001. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414: 631-634.
29. Hwang JM, Hofstetter JR, Bonhomme F, Karn RC. 1997. The microevolution of mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) paralleled subspeciation of Mus musculus. Journal of Heredity 88: 93-97.
30. Karn RC. 1981. Sex-limited effects of the expression of the db gene in mice during puberty. Biochemical Genetics 193: 355-371.
31. Karn RC, Dlouhy SR. 1991. Salivary androgen-binding protein variation in Mus and other rodents. Journal of Heredity 82: 453-458.
32. Karn RC, Nachman MW. 1999. Reduced nucleotide variability at an androgen-binding protein locus (Abpa) in house mice: Evidence for positive natural selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1192-1197.
33. Karn RC, Orth A, Bonhomme F, Boursot P. 2002. The complex history of a gene proposed to participate in a sexual isolation mechanism in house mice. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 462-471.
34. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159: S22-S35.
35. Laukaitis CM, Critser ES, Karn RC. 1997. Salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution 51: 2000-2005.
36. Laukaitis CM, Karn RC. 2005. Evolution of the secretoglobins: a genomic and proteomic view. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 493-501.
37. Macholán M, Kryštufek B, Vohralík V. 2003. The location of the Mus musculus/M. domesticus hybrid zone in the Balkans: clues from morphology. Acta Theriologica 48: 177-188.
38. Macholán M, Zima J. 1994. Mus domesticus in Western Bohemia: a new mammal for the Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica 43: 39-41.
39. Monahan E, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Maxson SC. 1993. Olfactory discrimination of urinary odortypes from congenic strains (DBA/1Bg and DBA1.C57BL10-Ybg) of mice differing in their Y chromosomes. Behavior Genetics 23: 251-256.
40. Moulia C, Aussel JP, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Nielsen JT, Renaud F. 1991. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone: a genetic control of susceptibility to parasite infection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 679-687.
41. Munclinger P, Božíková E, Šugerková M, Piálek J, Macholán M. 2002. Genetic variation in house mice (Mus, Muridae, Rodentia) from the Czech and Slovak Republics. Folia Zoologica 51: 81-92.
42. Nevison CM, Barnard CJ, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL. 2000. The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 687-694.
43. Noldus LPJJ, Trienes RJH, Hendriksen AHM, Jansen H, Jansen RG. 2000. The Observer Video-Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 32: 197-206.
44. Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N, Takano-Shimizu T, Toshimori K, Moriwaki K, Shiroishi T. 2004. Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics 166: 913-924.
45. Orr MR. 1996. Life-history adaptation and reproductive isolation in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Evolution 50: 704-716.
46. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 364-371.
47. Payseur BA, Nachman MW. 2005. The genomics of speciation: investigating the molecular correlates of X chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus domesticus and Mus musculus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 523-534.
48. Penn DJ. 2002. The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108: 1-21.
49. Penn D, Potts W. 1999. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. American Naturalist 153: 145-164.
50. Reynolds JD. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 68-72.
51. Sage RD, Atchley WR, Capanna E. 1993. House mice as models in systematic biology. Systematic Biology 42: 523-561.
52. Sage RD, Heyneman D, Lim K-C, Wilson AC. 1986. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone. Nature 324: 60-62.
53. Smadja C, Catalan J, Ganem G. 2004. Strong premating divergence in a unimodal hybrid zone between two subspecies in the house mouse. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 165-176.
54. Smadja C, Ganem G. 2002. Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology 13: 312-320.
55. StatSoft Inc. 2001. Statistica: data analysis software system. Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa.
56. Storchová R, Gregorová S, Buckiová D, Kyselová V, Divina P, Forejt J. 2004. Genetic analysis of X-linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mammalian Genome 15: 515-524.
57. Talley HM, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC. 2001. Female preference for male saliva: Implications for sexual isolation of Mus musculus subspecies. Evolution 55: 631-634.
58. Tucker PK, Sage RD, Warner J, Wilson AC, Eicher EM. 1992. Abrupt cline for sex chromosomes in a hybrid zone between two species of mice. Evolution 46: 1146-1163.
59. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 330-343.
60. Vanlerberghe F, Boursot P, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F. 1988. A steep cline for mitochondrial DNA in Danish mice. Genetical Research 52: 185-193.
61. Vanlerberghe F, Dod B, Boursot P, Bellis M, Bonhomme F. 1986. Absence of Y-chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus. Genetical Research 48: 191-197.
62. Vyskočilová M, Trachtulec Z, Forejt J, Piálek J. 2005. Does geography matter in hybrid sterility in house mice? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 663-674.
63. Wells MM, Henry CS. 1998. Songs, reproductive isolation, and speciation in cryptic species of insects: a case study using green lacewings. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York: Oxford University Press, 217-233.
64. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Bard J, Boyse EA. 1990. Chemosensory identity and the Y chromosome. Behavioral Genetics 20: 157-165.
65. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Matsuzaki O, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse EA. 1986. Participation of murine X and Y chromosomes in genetically determined chemosensory identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 83: 4438-4440.