Exploring protein folding trajectories using geometric spanners

Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2005, PSB 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 40-51

  Russel, D ^a   Guibas, L ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D STRUCTURES; GEOMETRIC GRAPHS; GEOMETRIC SPANNER; MULTI-RESOLUTIONS; PROTEIN FOLDS; SECONDARY AND TERTIARY STRUCTURES; SPARSE SET;

ATOMS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; TRAJECTORIES; VISUALIZATION;

GEOMETRY;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 15944386023     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. S. Arya, G. Das, D. Mount, J. Salowe, and M. Smid. Euclidean spanners: short, thin, and lanky. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 489-498. ACM Press, 1995.
2. G. Das, P. Heffernan, and G. Narasimhan. Optimally sparse spanners in 3- dimensional Euclidean space. In Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 53-62. ACM Press, 1993.
3. G. Das and G. Narasimhan. A fast algorithm for constructing sparse Euclidean spanners. In Symposium on Computational geometry, pages 132-139. ACM Press, 1994.
4. Nikolay Dokholyan, Lewyn Li, Feng Ding, and Eugene Shakhnovich. Topolical determinants of protein folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, pages 8637-8641, 2002.
5. H. Edelsbrunner, D. Letscher, and A. Zomorodian. Topological persistence and simplification. Discrete Compututational Geometry, 28:511-533, 2002.
6. D. Eppstein. Spanning trees and spanners. Handbook of Computational Geometry, pages 451-461, 2000.
7. J. Gao, L. J. Guibas, and A. Nguyen. Deformable spanners and applications. In Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 179-199, June 2004.
8. N. Guex and M. C. Peitsch. Swiss-model and the swiss-pdbviewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis, 18:2714- 2723, 1997. URL http://www.expasy.org/spdbv/.
9. E. Martz. Protein explorer: Easy yet powerful macromolecular visualization. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 27:107-109, 2002. URL http://proteinexplorer.org.
10. Rasmol. URL http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/.
11. Y.M. Rhee, E. J. Sorin, G. Jayachandran, E. Lindahl, and V. Pande. Simulations of the role of water in the protein-folding mechanism. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, volume 101, pages 6456- 6461, 2004.
12. M. Shirts and V. Pande. Screen savers of the world, unite! Science, 2000. URL http://folding.stcLnford.edu/.
13. M. J. Sippl. On the problem of comparing protein structures. Journal Molecular Biology, 156:359-388, 1982.