Efficacy of two cyclooctadepsipeptides, PF1022A and emodepside, against anthelmintic-resistant nematodes in sheep and cattle

Parasitology

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 343-347

  Von Samson Himmelstjerna, G ^a   Harder, A ^b   Sangster, N C ^c   Coles, G C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b BAYER AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anthelmintic resistance; Cyclooctadepsipeptide; Emodepside; Nematode; PF1022A

Indexed keywords

ANTHELMINTIC AGENT; BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; CYCLO(DEXTRO LACTYL N METHYLLEUCYL DEXTRO 3 PHENYLLACTYL N METHYLLEUCYL DEXTRO LACTYL N METHYLLEUCYL DEXTRO 3 PHENYLLACTYL N METHYLLEUCYL); CYCLOOCTADEPSIPEPTIDE; CYCLOPEPTIDE; DEPSIPEPTIDE; EMODEPSIDE; FEBANTEL; IVERMECTIN; LEVAMISOLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ANTHELMINTHIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERIA ONCOPHORA; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG MECHANISM; EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION; HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS; LARVA; NEMATODIASIS; NONHUMAN; PARASITE IDENTIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP DISEASE;

ANIMALS; ANTHELMINTICS; ANTINEMATODAL AGENTS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DEPSIPEPTIDES; DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTES; DRUG RESISTANCE; IVERMECTIN; LEVAMISOLE; NEMATODE INFECTIONS; SHEEP; SHEEP DISEASES;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS; COOPERIA ONCOPHORA; EQUIDAE; NEMATODA; ONCOPHORA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 15944380075     PISSN: 00311820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182004006523     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BOERSEMA, J. H., EYSKER, M. & NAS, J. W. (2002). Apparent resistance of Parascaris equorum to macrocyclic lactones. Veterinary Record 150, 279-281.
2. COLES, G. C. (2002). Cattle resistant to anthelmintics: why so few cases? Veterinary Research 33, 481-489.
3. FUKASHE, T., KOIKE, T., CHINONE, S., AKIHAMA, S., IAGAKE, H., TAKAGI, M., SHIMIZU, T., YAGUCHI, T., SASAKI, T. & OKADA, T. (1990). Anthelmintic effects of PF1022, a new cyclic depsipeptide, on the intestinal parasitic nematodes in dogs and cats. Proceedings of the 110th Meeting of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science, 122 (Abstr.).
4. HARDER, A. (2002). Chemotherapeutic approaches to nematodes: current knowledge and outlook. Parasitology Research 88, 272-277.
5. HARDER, A. & SAMSON-HIMMELSTJERNA, G. VON (2002). Cyclooctadepsipeptides - a new class of anthelmintically active compounds. Parasitology Research 88, 481-488.
6. MARTIN, R., HARDER, A., LONDERSHAUSEN, M. & JESCHKE, P. (1996). Anthelmintic actions of the cyclic depsipeptide PF1022A and electrophysiological effects on muscle cells of Ascaris suum. Pesticide Science 48, 343-349.
7. MEJIA, M. E., FERNANDEZ IGARTUA, B. M., SCHMIDT, E. E. & CABARET, J. (2003). Multispecies and multiple anthelmintic resistance on cattle nematodes in a farm in Argentina: the beginning of high resistance? Veterinary Research 34, 461-467.
8. SAEGER, B., SCHMITT-WREDE, H. P., DEHNHARDT, M., BENTEN, W. P., KRÜCKEN, J., HARDER, A., SAMSON-HIMMELSTJERNA, G. VON, WIEGAND, H. & WUNDERLICH, F. (2001). Latrophilin-like receptor from the parasite nematode Haemonchus contortus as target for the anthelmintic depsipeptide PF1022A. FASEB Journal 15, 1332-1334.
9. SANGSTER, N. C. (2001). Managing parasiticide resistance. Veterinary Parasitology 98, 89-109.
10. SANGSTER, N. C. & GILL, J. (1999). Pharmacology of anthelmintic resistance, Parasitology Today 15, 141-146.
11. SAMSON-HIMMELSTJERNA, G. VON, HARDER, A., SCHNIEDER, T., KALBE, J. & MENCKE, N. (2000). In vivo activities of the new anthelmintic depsipeptide PF1022A. Parasitology Research 86, 194-199.
12. SASAKI, T., TAKAGI, T., YAGUCHI, T., MIYADOH, S., OKADA, T. & KOYAMA, M. (1992). A new anthelmintic cyclodepsipeptide, PF1022A. Journal of Antibiotics 45, 692-697.
13. SCHERKENBECK, J., JESCHKE, P. & HARDER, A. (2002). PF1022A and related cyclodepsipeptides - a novel class of anthelmintics. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 2, 759-777.
14. STAFFORD, K. & COLES, G. C. (1999). Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance in dairy calves in the south west of England. Veterinary Record 144, 659-661.
15. TAGAKI, M., SASAKI, T., YAGUCHI, T., KODAMA, Y., OKADA, T., MIYADOH, S. & KOYAMA, M. (1991). On a new cyclic depsipeptide, PF1022 with anthelmintic effects. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi 65, 326.
16. TERADA, M. (1992). Neuropharmacological mechanism of action of PF1022A, an antinematode anthelmintic with a new structure of cyclic depsipeptide, on Angiostrongylus cantonensis and isolated frog rectus. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 41, 108-117.
17. WALLER, P. J. (1997). Anthelmintic resistance. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 391-412.
18. WETZEL, R. (1951). Verbesserte McMaster Kammer zum Auszählen von Wurmeiern. Tierärztliche Umschau 11, 209.
19. WILLSON, J., AMLIWALA, K., HARDER, A., HOLDEN-DYE, L. & WALKER, R. (2003). The effect of the anthelmintic emodepside at the neuromuscular junction of the parasitic nematode Ascaris suum. Parasitology 126, 79-86.
20. WOOD, I. B., AMARAL, N. K., BAIRDEN, K., DUNCAN, J. L., KASSAI, T., MALONE, J. B., PANAKOVICH, J. A., REINECKE, R. K., SLOCOMBE, O., TAYLOR, S. M. & VERCRUYSSE, J. (1995). World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition of guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics in ruminants (bovine, ovine, caprine). Veterinary Parasitology 58, 181-213.