Allozyme variation, differentiation, and inbreeding in populations of Pinus mugo in Bulgaria

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2611-2617

  Slavov, Gancho T ^a   Zhelev, Peter ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FORESTRY   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENZYMES; GENES; POPULATION STATISTICS; STATISTICAL METHODS; WOOD;

GENE DIVERSITY; GENETIC VARIATIONS; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

FORESTRY;

GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; ENZYMES; FORESTRY; GENES; ISOLATION; PINUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BALKAN MOUNTAINS; BULGARIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; VITOSHA MOUNTAIN; WORLD;

GYMNOSPERMAE; PINUS MUGO;

EID: 15944371337     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X04-127     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bossart, J.L., and Prowell, D.P. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 202-206.
2. Bozilova, E.D., and Tonkov, S.B. 2000. Pollen from Lake Sedmo Rilsko reveals southeast postglacial vegetation in the highest mountain area of the Balkans. New Phytol. 148: 315-325.
3. Bruederle, L.P., Tomback, D.F., Kelly, K.K., and Hardwick, R.C. 1998. Population genetic structure in a bird-dispersed pine, Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). Can. J. Bot. 76: 83-90.
4. Carson, H.L. 1959. Genetic conditions which promote or retard the formation of species. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24: 87-105.
5. Cheliak, W.M., and Pitel, J.A. 1984. Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. Can. For. Serv. Petawawa Natl. For. Inst. Inf. Rep. PI-X-42.
6. Christensen, K.I. 1987. Taxonomic revision of the Pinus mugo complex and P. x rhaetica (P. mugo x sylvestris) (Pinaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 7: 383-408.
7. Critchfield, W.B., and Little, E.L. 1966. Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. USDA For. Serv. Misc. Publ. 991.
8. Delgado, P., Pinňero, D., Chaos, A., Pérez-Nasser, N., Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. 1999. High population differentiation and genetic variation in the endangered Mexican pine Pinus rzedowskii (Pinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86: 669-676.
9. Filppula, S., Szmidt, A.E., and Savolainen, O. 1992. Genetic comparison between Pinus sylvestris L., and Pinus mugo Turra using isozymes and chloroplast DNA. Nord. J. Bot. 12: 381-386.
10. Frankham, R. 1997. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity, 78: 311-327.
11. Goncharenko, G.G., Silin, A.E., and Padutov, V.E. 1994. Allozyme variation in natural populations of Eurasian pines. III. Population structure, diversity, differentiation and gene flow in central and isolated populations of Pinus sylvestris L. in Eastern Europe and Siberia. Silvae Genet. 43: 119-131.
12. Goncharenko, G.G., Padutov, A.E., and Khotyljova, L.V. 1998. Genetic mapping of allozyme loci in four two-needle pine species of Europe. For. Genet. 5: 103-118.
13. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
14. Hamrick, J.L., Godt, M.J.W., and Sherman-Broyles, S.L. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For. 6: 95-124.
15. Hamrick, J.L., Blanton, H.M, and Hamrick, K.J. 1989. Genetic structure of geographically marginal populations of ponderosa pine. Am. J. Bot. 76: 1559-1568.
16. Howe, G.T, Aitken, S.N., Neale, D.B., Jermstad, K.D., Wheeler, N.C., and Chen, T.H.H. 2003. From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Can. J. Bot. 81: 1247-1266.
17. Huntley, B., and Birks, H.J.B. 1983. An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0-13000 years ago. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
18. Jørgensen, S., Hamrick, J.L., and Wells P.V. 2002. Regional patterns of genetic diversity in Pinus flexilis (Pinaceae) reveal complex species history. Am. J. Bot. 89: 792-800.
19. Knowles, P., Perry, D.J., and Foster, H.A. 1992. Spatial genetic structure in two Tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) populations with differing establishment histories. Evolution, 46: 572-576.
20. Korshikov, I.I., and Pirko, Ya.V. 2002. Genetic variation and differentiation of peat-bog and dry-meadow populations of the dwarf mountain pine Pinus mugo Turra in the highlands of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Russ. J. Genet. 38: 1044-1050.
21. Krakowski, J., Aitken, S.N., El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2003. Inbreeding and conservation genetics in whitebark pine. Conserv. Genet. 4: 581-593.
22. Krutovskii, K.V., Politov, D.V., and Altukhov, Yu.P. 1995. Isozyme study of population genetic structure, mating system, and phylogenetic relationships of the five stone pine species (subsection Cembrae, section Strobi, subgenus Strobus). In Population genetics and genetic conservation of forest trees. Edited by Ph. Baradat, W.T. Adams, and G. Müller-Starck. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 279-304.
23. Le Corre, V., and Kremer, A. 1998. Cumulative effects of founding events during colonization on genetic diversity and differentiation in an island and stepping-stone model. J. Evol. Biol. 11: 495-512.
24. Lesica, P., and Allendorf, F.W. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv. Biol. 9: 753-760.
25. Li, P., and Adams, W.T. 1989. Range-wide patterns of allozyme variation in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. Forest Res. 19: 149-161.
26. Lipow, S.R., St. Clair, J.B., and Johnson, G.R. 2002. Ex situ gene conservation for conifers in the Pacific Northwest. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-528.
27. Michaud, H., Toumi L., Lumaret, R., Li, T.X., Romane, F., and Di Giusto, F. 1995. Effect of geographical discontinuity on genetic variation of Quercus ilex L. (holm oak). Evidence from enzyme polymorphism. Heredity, 74: 590-606.
28. Neet-Sarqueda, C. 1994. Genetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris L., and Pinus tnugo aggr. Populations in Switzerland. Silvae Genet. 43: 207-215.
29. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583:590.
30. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
31. Neigel, J.E. 1997. A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 105-128.
32. Odrzykoski, I.J. 2002. Badania nad zmiennóscia̧ genetyczna̧ kosodrzewiny (Pinus mugo) z wykorzystaniem markerów biochemicznych i molekularnych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań, Poland. [Polish with English summary.]
33. Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.
34. Sandoz, H. 1983. Considérations sur la genèse du Pin mugho (Pinus mughus Scopoli), son berceau probable, sa répartition ancienne et actuelle. Rev. Gen. Bot. 90: 23-41.
35. Scaltsoyiannes, A., Rohr, R., Panetsos, K.P., and Tsaktsira, M. 1994. Allozyme frequency distribution in five European populations of Black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold). Silvae Genet. 43: 20-30.
36. Schnabel A., and Hamrick, J.L. 1990. Organization of genetic diversity within and among populations of Gleditsia triacanthos (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 77: 1060-1069.
37. Schuster, W.S.F., and Mitton, J.B. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity, 84: 348-361.
38. Siedlewska, A. 1994. Isoenzymatic differentiation in putative hybrid swarm population (Pinus mugo Turra x Pinus sylvestris L.) from "Torfowisko Zieleniec" peat-bog. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 63: 325-332.
39. Siedlewska, A., and Prus-Głowacki, W. 1994. Allozyme variability of putative hybrid swarm population (Pinus mugo Turra x Pinus sylvestris L.) from Topielisko peat-bog near Zieleniec. Genet. Pol. 35: 285-302.
40. Sork, V.L., Nason, J., Campbell, D.R., and Fernandez, J.F. 1999. Landscape approaches to contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 219-224.
41. Swofford, D.L., and Selander, R.B. 1989. BIOSYS-1: a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champagne, Ill.
42. Tomback, D.F., Holtmeier F.-K., Mattes, H., Carsey, K.S., and Powell, M.L. 1993. Tree clusters and growth form distribution in Pinus cembra, a bird-dispersed pine. Arct. Alp. Res. 25: 374-381.
43. Turner, M.E., Stephens, J.C., and Anderson, W.W. 1982. Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79: 203-207.
44. Whitlock, M.C. 1992. Temporal fluctuations in demographic parameters and the genetic variance among populations. Evolution, 46: 608-615.
45. Whitlock, M.C., and Barton, N.H. 1997. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics, 146: 427-441.
46. Whitlock, M.C., and McCauley, D.E. 1990. Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution, 44: 1717-1724.
47. ST ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity, 82: 117-125.
48. Weir, B.S., and Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370.
49. Willis, K.J. 1994. The vegetation history of the Balkans. Quat. Sci. Rev. 13: 769-788.
50. Wright, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19: 395-420.
51. Yanchuk, A. 2001. A quantitative framework for breeding and conservation of forest tree genetic resources in British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 566-576.