ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve: Principles and application in biology;La courbe ROC (receiver operating characteristic): Principes et principales applications en biologie clinique

Annales de Biologie Clinique

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 145-154

  Delacour, H ^a,b   Servonnet, A ^b   Perrot, A ^a   Vigezzi, J F ^a   Ramirez, J M ^a  

^a Toxicologie Cliniques   (France)

^b Lab Biochim Toxicologie Cliniques   (France)

Author keywords

Cut off; Diagnostic accuracy; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNET; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE TUMOR; REVIEW; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 15944363483     PISSN: 00033898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Lusted LB. Logical analysis in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology 1960 ; 74 : 178-93.
2. Lusted LB. Signal detectability and medical decision making. Science 1971 ; 171 : 1217-9.
3. Joe Au YH, Eissa S, Jones BE. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the selection of threshold values for detecion of capping in powder compression. Ultrasonics 2004 ; 42 : 149-53.
4. Van Erkel AR, Pattynama P. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis : basic principles and applications in radiology. Eur J Radiol 1998 ; 27 : 88-94.
5. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000 ; 45 : 23-41.
6. Landais P, Besson C, Jais JP. Evaluation of the diagnostic contribution of a test. Main information indices. J Radiol 1994 ; 75 : 141-50.
7. Bouyer J, Hémon D, Cordier S, et al. In : Épidemiologie, principes et méthodes quantitatives. Paris : Inserm, 1995 : 338-40.
8. Metz CE, Hermann BA, Shen JH. Maximum likehood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Med Decis Mak 1998 ; 17 : 1033-53.
9. Ramirez JM, Vigezzi JF, Delacour H, Gidenne S, Clerc Y. Étude analytique des dosages de PSA total, PSA libre sur l'immunoanalyseur Elecsys 2010® Roche Diagnostics et de l'efficicacité cliniques des pourcentages de PSA libre. Immunoanal Biol Spec 2002 ; 17 : 257-63.
10. Swets JA. Mesuring the accuracy of diagnosis system. Science 1988 ; 240 : 1285-93.
11. Ohlmann P, Monassier JP, Michotey MO, et al. Troponin I concentrations following primary percutaneous coronary intervention predict large infarct size and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis 2003 ; 168 : 181-9.
12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method for comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983 ; 148 : 839-43.
13. De Long ER, DeLong DM, Clarke Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves : a non parametric approach. Biometrics 1988 ; 44 : 837-45.
14. Imbert-Bismuth F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T. Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection : a prospective study. Lancet 2001 ; 357 : 1069-75.
15. Thomson ML, Zucchini W. On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Stat Med 1989 ; 8 : 1277-90.
16. McClish D. Analyzing a portion of the ROC curves and their analysis. Med Decis Mak 1989 ; 9 : 190-5.
17. Jiang Y, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. A receiver operating characteristic partial index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology 1996 ; 201 : 745-50.
18. Hammerer-Lercher A, Neubauer E, Müller S, Pachinger O, Puschendorf B, Mair J. Head-to-head comparaison of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in diagnosing left ventricular dysfunction. Clin Chim Acta 2001 ; 310 : 193-7.
19. Smith RD. Evaluation of diagnostic tests. In : Veterinary clinical epidemiology. A problem oriented approach. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1992 : 31-43.
20. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots : a fundamental evolution tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993 ; 39 : 561-77.
21. Bruns D, Huth EJ, Magid E, Younf DS. Toward a checklist for reporting if studies of diagnostic accurancy of medical tests. Clin Chem 2000 ; 46 : 893-5.
22. Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML, Wians FH. ROC curves in clinical chemistry : uses, misuses, and possible solutions. Clin Chem 2004 ; 50 : 1118-25.
23. Stephan C, Wesseling S, Schink T, Jung K. Comparaison of eight computer programs for receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Clin Chem 2003 ; 49 : 433-9.