Toward a checklist for reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy of medical tests

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 893-895

  Bruns, David E ^a   Huth, Edward J ^b   Magid, Erik ^c   Young, Donald S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Annals of Internal Medicine   (United States)

^c AMAGER HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

EID: 0033925351     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/46.7.893     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274:645-51.
2. Bogardus ST, Concato J, Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research. The need for methodological standards. JAMA 1999;281:1919-26.
3. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JHP, Bossuyt PMM. Empirical evidence of deign-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
4. Bruns DE. The Clinical Chemist. Clin Chem 1997;43:2211-2.
5. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240:1285-93.
6. Anonymous. Information for authors. Clin Chem 2000;46:l-5.