Advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 309-320

  Gladish, Gregory W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac function; Cardiac imaging; Computed tomography; Coronary artery imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; METOPROLOL;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CARDIOMYOPATHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 15844408258     PISSN: 14779072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14779072.3.2.309     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Lanzer P, Botvinick EH, Schiller NB et al. Cardiac imaging using gated magnetic resonance. Radiology 150, 121-127 (1984).
2. Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the heart: overview of the literature. Radiology 232, 653-668 (2004).
3. Boxt LM. Cardiac MR imaging: a guide for the beginner. Radiographics 19, 1009-1025 (1999).
4. Boxt LM. Primer on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: how to perform the examination. Top. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 11, 331-347 (2000).
5. Amparo EG, Higgins CB, Farmer D, Gamsu G, McNamara M. Gated MRI of cardiac and paracardiac masses: initial experience. Am. J. Roentgenol. 143, 1151-1156 (1984).
6. Edelman RR, Chien D, Kim D. Fast selective black-blood MR imaging. Radiology 181, 655-660 (1991).
7. Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. 'Black blood' T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 199, 49-57 (1996).
8. Vignaux OB, Augui J, Coste J et al. Comparison of single-shot fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo sequences for MR imaging of the heart: initial experience. Radiology 219, 545-550 (2001).
9. Atkinson DJ, Edelman RR. Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. Radiology 178, 357-360 (1991).
10. Pattynama PM, De Roos A, Van der Wall EE, Van Voorthuisen AE. Evaluation of cardiac function with magnetic resonance imaging. Am. Heart J. 128, 595-607 (1994).
11. Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M et al. Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection T1-201 and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT: comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33, 991-997 (1999).
12. Rerkpattanapipat P, Mazur W, Link KM, Hundley WG. Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magnet Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 67-80 (2003).
13. Utz JA, Herfkens RJ, Heinsimer JA, Shimakawa A, Glover G, Pelc N. Valvular regurgitation: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 168, 91-94 (1988).
14. Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, Enzmann DR. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magnet. Reson. Q7, 229-254 (1991).
15. Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KC, Brosnan TJ, Herfkens RJ, Enzmann DR. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magnet. Reson. Q10, 125-147 (1994).
16. Didier D. Assessment of valve disease: qualitative and quantitative. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 115-134 (2003).
17. Lee VS, Resnick D, Bundy JM, Simonetti OP, Lee P, Weinreb JC. Cardiac function: MR evaluation in one breath hold with real-time true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 222, 835-842 (2002).
18. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnet. Reson. Med. 42, 952-962 (1999).
19. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE. SENSitivity Encoding scheme. Magnet. Reson. Med. 43, 177-184 (2000).
20. Mani V, Itskovich VV, Szimtenings M et al. Rapid extended coverage simultaneous multisection black-blood vessel wall MR imaging. Radiology 232, 281-288 (2004).
21. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 174, 757-762 (1990).
22. Edelman RR, Li W. Contrast-enhanced echo-planar MR imaging of myocardial perfusion: preliminary study in humans. Radiology 190, 771-777 (1994).
23. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36, 1985-1991 (2000).
24. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100, 1992-2002 (1999).
25. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 106, 1083-1089 (2002).
26. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218, 215-223 (2001).
27. Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E et al. Myocardial viability: breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology 230, 845-851 (2004).
28. Kuhl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 230, 576-582 (2004).
29. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U. Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Heart J. 23, 602-619 (2002).
30. Sandstede JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability by MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 13, 52-61 (2003).
31. Sandstede JJ, Lipke C, Beer M et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. Am. J. Roentgenol. 174, 1737-1740 (2000).
32. Lund GK, Stork A, Saeed M et al. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201TI SPECT imaging. Radiology 232, 49-57 (2004).
33. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1445-1453 (2000).
34. Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation 104, 1101-1107 (2001).
35. Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Schulman SP, Atalar E, Zerhouni EA. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation 92, 1117-1125 (1995).
36. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 98, 1006-1014 (1998).
37. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Holly TA et al. Reproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106, 2322-2327 (2002).
38. Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT et al. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 102, 506-510 (2000).
39. Edelman RR, Manning WJ, Burstein D, Paulin S. Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 181, 641-643 (1991).
40. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B et al. Coronary MR angiography with steady-state free precession: individually adapted breath-hold technique versus free-breathing technique. Radiology 232, 669-676 (2004).
41. Li D, Kaushikkar S, Haacke EM et al. Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with retrospective respiratory gating. Radiology 201, 857-863 (1996).
42. Danias PG, McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Chuang ML, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 203, 733-736 (1997).
43. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 42, 1867-1878 (2003).
44. Castillo E, Tandri H, Rodriguez ER et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: ex vivo and in vivo fat detection with black-blood MR imaging. Radiology 232, 38-48 (2004).
45. Blake LM, Scheinman MM, Higgins CB. MR features of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Am. J. Roentgenol. 162, 809-812 (1994).
46. Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, Sivananthan MU, Plein S, Bloomer TN, de Roos A. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a review. Radiographics 22, 639-648 (2002).
47. Boxt LM, Rozenshtein A. MR imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 163-171 (2003).
48. Araoz PA, Eklund HE, Welch TJ, Breen JF. CT and MR imaging of primary cardiac malignancies. Radiographics 19, 1421-1434 (1999).
49. Gilkeson RC, Chiles C. MR evaluation of cardiac and pericardial malignancy. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 173-186 (2003).
50. Glockner JF. Imaging of pericardial disease. Magnet. Reson. Imag. Clin. N. Am. 11, 149-162 (2003).
51. Soler R, Rodriguez E, Remuinan C, Bello MJ, Diaz A. Magnetic resonance imaging of primary cardiomyopathies. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 27, 724-734 (2003).
52. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H et al. Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 1539-1544 (2002).
53. Brundage BH, Lipton MJ. What is the role of CT scanning of the heart? Cardiovasc. Clin. 13, 91-112 (1983).
54. Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Farmer D, Boyd DP. Cardiac imaging with a high-speed Cine-CT scanner: preliminary results. Radiology 152, 579-582 (1984).
55. Oyama Y, Uji T, Hirayama T, Inada Y, Ishikawa T, Fujii M. Gated cardiac imaging using a continuously rotating CT scanner: clinical evaluation of 91 patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 142, 865-876 (1984).
56. Desjardins B, Kazerooni EA. ECG-gated cardiac CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 993-1010 (2004).
57. Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am. J. Cardiol. 80, 569-574 (1997).
58. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Marshall AJ. Aortic valve imaging with computed tomography: a review. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11, 604-611 (2002).
59. Stanford W, Thompson BH, Weiss RM. Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. Am. J. Roentgenol. 161, 1139-1146 (1993).
60. Rienmuller R, Groll R, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 42, 587-601 (2004).
61. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 15, 827-832 (1990).
62. Agatston AS, Janowits WR, Kaplan G, Gasso J, Hildner F, Viamonte M Jr. Ultrafast computed tomography-detected coronary calcium reflects the angiographic extent of coronary arterial atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 74, 1272-1274 (1994).
63. Brown BG, Morse J, Zhao XQ, Cheung M, Marino E, Albers JJ. Electron-beam tomography coronary calcium scores are superior to Framingham risk variables for predicting the measured proximal stenosis burden. Am. J. Cardiol. 88(Suppl.), 23-26 (2001).
64. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 291, 210-215 (2004).
65. Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Becker C et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 225, 113-119 (2002).
66. Budoff MJ, Mao S, Zalace CP, Bakhsheshi H, Oudiz RJ. Comparison of spiral and electron beam tomography in the evaluation of coronary calcification in asymptomatic persons. Int. J. Cardiol. 77, 181-188 (2001).
67. Stanford W, Thompson BH, Burns TL, Heery SD, Burr MC. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT. Radiology 230, 397-402 (2004).
68. Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107, 917-922 (2003).
69. Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P et al. Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur. Radiol. 13, 1923-1930 (2003).
70. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217, 564-571 (2000).
71. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmid FT, Gelman H, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ. Noninvasive coronary imaging with MDCT in comparison with invasive conventional coronary angiography: a fast-developing technology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 601-608 (2004).
72. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluaute global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 1545-1550 (2002).
73. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230, 403-410 (2004).
74. Boxt LM, Lipton MJ, Kwong RY, Rybicki F, Clouse ME. Computed tomography for assessment of cardiac chambers, valves, myocardium and pericardium. Cardiol. Clin. 21, 561-585 (2003).
75. Budoff MJ, Mao S, Takasu J, Shavelle DM, Zhao XQ, O'Brien KD. Reproducibility of electron-beam CT measures of aortic valve calcification. Acad. Radiol. 9, 1122-1127 (2002).
76. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 225, 120-128 (2002).
77. Schwartzman D, Lacomis J, Wigginton WG. Characterization of left atrium and distal pulmonary vein morphology using multidimensional computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41, 1349-1357 (2003).
78. Dery R, Lipton MJ, Garrett JS, Abbott J, Higgins CB, Schienman MM. Cine-computed tomography of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10, 120-123 (1986).
79. Shoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232, 18-37 (2004).
80. Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE et al. Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multidetector row CT. Radiology 232, 7-17 (2004).
81. Nieman K. Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229, 749-756 (2003).
82. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Kobza R et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography-influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. Radiology 232, 568-577 (2004).
83. Breen JF, Sheedy PF 2nd, Schwartz RS et al. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology 185, 435-439 (1992).
84. Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 26, 750-755 (2002).
85. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spinal computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107, 664-666 (2003)
86. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103, 2535-2538 (2001).
87. Hosoi S, Mochizuki T, Miyagawa M, Shen Y, Murase K, Ikezoe J. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies. Radiat. Med. 21, 62-67 (2003).
88. Wood AM, Hoffmann KR, Lipton MJ. Cardiac function. Quantification with magnetic resonance and computed tomography. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 32, 553-579 (1994).
89. Budoff MJ, Georgiu D, Brody A et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 93, 898-904 (1996).
90. Adamzik M, Schmermund A, Reed JE, Adamzik S, Behrenbeck T, Sheedy PF 2nd. Comparison of two differences software systems for electron-beam CT-derived quantification of coronary calcification. Invest. Radiol. 34, 767-773 (1991).