Developing a standard methodology for measuring and classifying construction field rework

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1077-1089

  Fayek, Aminah Robinson ^a   Dissanayake, Manjula ^a   Campero, Oswaldo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Field rework; Industrial construction; Rework classification; Rework index

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTS; COSTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SCHEDULING; STANDARDS;

CONSTRUCTION FIELD NETWORK; CONSTRUCTION FIELDS; DATASETS; INDUSTRY STANDARDS;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY;

CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 15844361911     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/L04-068     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ashford, J.L. 1992. The management of quality in construction. E.&F.N. Spon, London, U.K.
2. Burati, J.L., Farrington, J.J., and Ledbetter, W.B. 1992. Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1): 34-49.
3. Construction Industry Development Agency. 1995. Measuring up or muddling through: best practice in the Australian non-residential construction industry. Construction Industry Development Agency and Master Builders Australia, Sydney, Australia.
4. Construction Industry Institute. 1990. The quality performance management system: a blueprint for implementation. Research Summary 10-3, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
5. Construction Industry Institute. 1997. Pre-project planning tools: PDRI and alignment. Research Summary 113-1, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
6. Construction Industry Institute. 2001. The field rework index: early warning for field rework and cost growth. Research summary 153-1, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
7. Construction Industry Institute. 2003. CII benchmarking and metrics program [online]. Available from http://cii-benchmarking.org/downloads/ 3_the_metrics.ppt/ [cited 15 February 2003].
8. COAA. 2001. Field Rework Committee meeting minutes, 28 September 2001. Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA), Edmonton, Alta.
9. COAA. 2002. Project rework reduction tool (PRRT). Available from http://www.coaa.ab.ca/costreduction/prrt/ [cited 15 February 2003].
10. Fayek, A.R., Dissanayake, M., and Campero, O. 2003. Measuring and classifying construction field rework: a pilot study. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. Presented to the Construction Field Rework Committee, Construction Owners Association of Alberta, May 2003. Available from http:// www.construction.ualberta.ca/papers.shtml [accessed 1 December 2003].
11. Gibson, G.E., and Dumont, P.R. 1996. Project definition rating index (PDRI) for industrial projects. Construction Industry Institute Implementation Resource 113-2, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
12. Josephson, P.E., and Hammarlund, Y. 1999. The causes and costs of defects in construction: a study of seven building projects. Automation in Construction, 8(6): 681-687.
13. Love, P.E.D. 2002. Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1): 18-29.
14. Love, P.E.D., and Li, H. 2000. Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18 (4): 479-490.
15. Love, P.E.D., Wyatt, A.D., and Mohamed, S. 1997. Understanding rework in construction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Process Re-engineering, Gold Coast, Australia, 14-15 July 1997. Edited by S. Mohamed. School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. pp. 269-278.
16. Love, P.E.D., Mandal, P., Smith, J., and Li, H. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5): 567-574.
17. Project Management Institute. 2000. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 2000 ed. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pa.
18. Rogge, D.F., Cogliser, C., Alaman, H., and McCormack, S. 2001. An investigation of field rework in industrial construction. Research Report 153-11, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
19. Ruwanpura, J.Y., Meek, D., Nutting, T., Greaves, D., Hamlin, J., and Timler, M. 2003. Most significant causes for rework due to engineering deliverables. In Proceedings of the 5th Construction Specialty Conference, Moncton, N.B., June 2003. Edited by M. Massièra and N. El-Jabi. CD-ROM. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montréal, Que.
20. Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.