Dynamic optical breast imaging: A new technique to visualise breast vessels: Comparison with breast MRI and preliminary results

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 72-79

  Athanasiou, Alexandra ^a   Vanel, Daniel ^a   Balleyguier, Corinne ^a   Fournier, Laure ^a   Mathieu, Marie Christine ^a   Delaloge, Suzette ^a   Dromain, Clarisse ^a  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; Breast tumors; Dynamic curves; Optical imaging

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; DATA REDUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; RADIOLOGY;

BREAST IMAGING; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE DETECTORS (LED); VASCULARIZATION;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGHT ABSORPTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 15744383674     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Mitchell G, Eeles R. Incidence and aetiology of breast cancer. International handbook of cancer. Euromed Communications Ltd.; 2002.
2. R.T. Greenlee, M.B. Hill-Harmon, and T. Murray Cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 51 2001 15 36
3. L. Tabar, B. Vitak, and H.H. Chen Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 91 2001 1724 1731
4. O. Olsen, and P.C. Gotzsche Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography Lancet 358 2001 1340 1342
5. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:344-6.
6. I. Saarenmaa, T. Salminen, and U. Geiger The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme Eur J Cancer 35 1999 1118 1122
7. E. Warner, G. Lockwood, and D. Tritchler The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification Cancer Detect Prev 16 1992 67 72
8. J.M. Lewin, C.J. D'Orsi, and R.E. Hendrick Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer AJR Am J Ronetgenol 179 2002 671 677
9. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, and S.M. Rubin Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis JAMA 273 1995 149 154
10. NCI statement on mammography screening. Office of Communications/Mass Media Branch. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 21 February 2002.
11. E.A. Sickles Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 99 104
12. T.W. Freer, and M.J. Ulissey Computer-aided diagnosis in full-field digital mammography: a prospective study of 12, 680 patients in a community breast center Radiology 217 2000 400
13. K.C. Kuhl, S. Schrading, and C.C. Leutner Surveillance of 'high risk' women with proven or suspected familial (hereditary) breast cancer: first mid-term results of a multi-modality clinical screening trial J Clin Oncol 21 Suppl. 23 2003 238
14. J.A. Smith, and E. Andreopoulou An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer Ann Oncol 15 Suppl. 1 2004 18 26