Adaptive automation: Design of authority for system safety

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 36, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 13-22

  Inagaki, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aircraft; Human factors; Human supervisory control; Human centered design; Human machine interface; Man machine interaction; Safety critical; Vehicles

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SAFETY ENGINEERING; VEHICLES;

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; FUNCTION ALLOCATIONS; HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; HUMAN SUPERVISORY CONTROL; HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGNS; MAN/MACHINE INTERACTIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 15744369938     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)32389-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Banks, S.B. & Lizza, C.S. (1991). Pilot's associate. IEEE Expert, 6(3),18-29.
2. Billings, C. E. (1997). Aviation automation - the search for a human-centered approach. LEA.
3. Domheim, M. (1995, January 30). Dramatic incidents highlight mode problems in cockpits. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 142(5),57-59.
4. Domheim, M. (1996, September 9). Recovered FMC memory puts new spin on Cali accident. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 145(11), 58-61.
5. Endsley, M.R., & Kaber, D.S. (1997). The use of level of automation as a means ofalleviating out-of-the-Ioop performance problems: A taxonomy and empirical analysis. In Proc. of the 13th Triennial Congress of the lEA (pp.168-170). Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
6. Endsley, M.R. & Kiris, E.O. (1995). The out-of-the-Ioop performance problem and the level ofcontrol in automation. Human Factors, 37(2),3181-3194.
7. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp.150- 155). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
8. Hammer, J.M. & Small, R.L. (1995). An intelligent interface in an associate system. Human/Technology Interaction in Complex Systems. JAI Press, 7, 1-44.
9. nd Ed., Avebury Technica.
10. Hughes, D. (1995, January 30). Incidents reveal mode confusion. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 142(5),56.
11. Inagaki, T. (1993). Situation-adaptive degree of automation for system safety. Proc. 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 231-236.
12. Inagaki, T. (1999). Situation-adaptive autonomy: Trading control of authority in human-machine systems. Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp.154-159). LEA.
13. Inagaki, T. (2000a). Situation-adaptive autonomy for time-critical takeoff decisions. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 20(2), 175-180.
14. Inagaki, T. (2000b). A multiplicity of loss of situation awareness. Human Interface, (2)1, 33-35 (In Japanese).
15. Inagaki, T (2000c). Situation-adaptive autonomy: Dynamic trading of authority between human and automation. Proc. IEA2000/HFES2000 Congress, 111.13-16.
16. Inagaki, T (2003). Adaptive automation: Sharing and Trading of Control. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (pp. 147-169). LEA.
17. Inagaki, T. & Johannsen, G. (1992). Human-computer interaction and cooperation for supervisory control of large-complex systems. Computer Aided Systems Theory, LNCS, Springer,281-294.
18. Inagaki, T., & Kunioka, T (2002). Possible automation surprises in the low-speed range adaptive cruise control system. lASTED Int'l Conference on Applied Modelling and Simulation, 335-340.
19. Kaber, D.B. & Riley, J.M. (1999). Adaptive automation ofa dynamic control task based on workload assessment through a secondary monitoring task, Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp.129-133). LEA.
20. Kaber, D.B., Omal, E., & Endsley, M.R. (1999). Level of automation effects on telerobot performance and human operator situation awareness and subjective workload, Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp.165-169). LEA.
21. Ladkin, P.B. (2002). ACAS and the south German midair, Technical Note RYS-Occ-02-02. (http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/publications/Reports/)
22. Learmount, D. (2002, July 9-15). Questions hang over collision. Flight International, 8.
23. Lee, J.D. & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243-1270.
24. Moray, N. & Inagaki, T (2000). Attention and complacency. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1(4),354-365.
25. Parasuraman, R., Bhari, T, Deaton, J.E., Morrison, lG., & Bames, M. (1992). Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems (Progress Rep. No. NAWCADWAR-92033-60). Warminster, PA: Naval Air Development Center Aircraft Division.
26. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I.L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." International Journal ofAviation Psychology. 3(1),1-23.
27. Rouse, W.B. (1988). Adaptive aiding for human/computer control. Human Factors, 30(4), 431-443.
28. Rouse, W.B. (1991). Design for Success: A Human Centered Approach to Designing Successful Products and Systems. New York: Wiley.
29. Rouse, W.B. (1994). Twenty years ofadaptive aiding: Origins ofthe concept and lessons learned. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp.28-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37(I), 5-19.
31. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., & Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.). Handbook ofHuman Factors and Ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1926-1943) New York: Wiley.
32. Scallen, S.F. & Hancock, P.A.(2001). Implementing adaptive function allocation. International Journal ofAviation Psychology, 11 (2), 197-221.
33. Scerbo, M. W. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.). Automation and human performance (pp.37-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Scott, W.B. (1999, February I). Automatic GCAS: "You can't fly any lower." Aviation Week and Space Technology, 150(5), 76-79.
35. Sheridan, T B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press.
36. Sheridan, TB. (2002). Humans and automation: System design and research issues. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society & Wiley.
37. Sparaco, P. (1994, January 3). Human factors cited in French A320 crash. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 140(I), 30-31.
38. Wickens, e.D. (1994). Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. In Proceedings ofIFA C Integrated Systems Engineering (pp.77-82). London, Pergamon Press.
39. Wickens, E.D., Mavor, A., Parasuraman, R., & McGee, J. (1998). The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Wiener, E.L. (1988). Cockpit automation. In E.L. Wiener & D.e. Nagel (Eds.). Human/actors in aviation (pp.433-46I). Academic Press.
40. Woods, D. (1989). The effects of automation on human's role: Experience from non-aviation industries. In S. Norman & H. Orlady (Eds.). Flight deck automation: Promises and realities (NASA CR-I 0036, pp.61-85). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.