Medical students' and tutors' experiences of directed and self-directed learning programs in evidence-based medicine a qualitative evaluation accompanying a randomized controlled trial

Evaluation Review

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 149-177

  Bradley, Peter ^a   Oterholt, Christina ^b   Nordheim, Lena ^c,d   Bjørndal, Arild ^c,d  

^a Norwegian Medicines Agency   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Norwegian Ctr for Hlth Serv Res   (Norway)

^d Natl Ctr for Hlth Serv Research   (Norway)

Author keywords

Directed learning; Evaluation of complex interventions; Evidence based practice; Medical education; Self directed learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NORWAY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EVALUATION STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LEARNING; NORWAY; PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 15744365859     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X04269085     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alabanese, M. 2000. Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education 34:729-38.
2. Audet, N., R. Gagnon. R. Ladouceur, and M. Marcil. 1993. L'enseignement de l'analyse critique des publications scientifiques médicales est-il efficace? Révision des études et de leur qualité méthodologique? Canadian Medical Association Journal 148 (6): 945-52.
3. Bradley, P., D. De la Harpe, L. Nordheim, S. Innvær, and C. Thompson. 2004. Educational interventions for evidence-based practice (EBP): A review of the qualitative literature. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bradley, P., C. Oterholt, J. Herrin, L. Nordheim, and A. Bjørndal. 2004. A comparison of directed and self-directed learning programmes in evidence-based medicine for medical students: A randomised controlled trial. Unpublished manuscript.
5. Britton, A., M. Thorogood, Y. Coombes, and G. Lewando-Hundt. 1998. Search for evidence of effective health promotion: Quantitative outcome evaluation with qualitative process evaluation is best. British Medical Journal 316:703-4.
6. Buckley, G. 1998. Partial truths: Research papers in medical education. Medical Education 32: 1-2.
7. Burls, A. J. 1997. An evaluation of the impact of half-day workshops teaching critical appraisal skills. Unpublished report. Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK.
8. Coomarasamy, A., R. Taylor, and K. S. Khan. 2003. A systematic review of postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal. Medical Teacher 25 (1): 77-81.
9. Ebbert, J. O., V. M. Montori, and H. J. Schultz. 2001. The journal club in postgraduate medical education: A systematic review. Medical Teacher 323 (5): 455-61.
10. Enock, K. 2000. An evaluation of computer aided learning within evidence-based health care educational resources. MSc diss., University of Oxford, UK.
11. Garg, A., and K. M. Turtle. 2003. Effectiveness of training health professionals in literature search skills using electronic health databases: A critical appraisal. Health Information & Libraries Journal 20 (1): 33-41.
12. Green, M. L. 1999. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal and evidence-based medicine: A critical review of curricula. Academic Medicine 74:686-94.
13. Greenhalgh, T. 2001. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. British Medical Journal 322:40-44.
14. Hatala, R., and G. Guyatt. 2002. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (9): 1110-11.
15. Hutchinson, L. 1999. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. British Medical Journal 318:1267-69.
16. Hyde, C., J. Parkes, J. Deeks, and R. Milne. 2000. Systematic review of effectiveness of teaching critical appraisal. Oxford, UK: ICRF/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine.
17. Miles, B. M., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Lycke, K. H., H. I. Stromsø, and P. Grøttum. 2002. PBL goes ICT: Problem-based learning in face-to-face and distributed groups in medical education at the University of Oslo. Faculty of Education report no. 4, University of Oslo, Norway.
19. Norman, G. R., and S. I. Shannon. 1998. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine): A critical appraisal. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association 158:177-81.
20. Parkes, J., C. Hyde, J. Deeks, and R. Milne. 2003. Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings [Cochrane review]. In The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford, UK: Update Software.
21. Richardson, D., and B. Birge. 1995. Teaching physiology by combined passive (pedagogical) and active (andragogical methods). Advances in Physiology Education 13 (1): 66-74.
22. Sackett, D. L., W. M. C. Rosenberg, J. A. M. Gray, R. B. Haynes, and W. S. Richardson. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal 312:71-72.
23. Speller, V., A. Learmonth, and D. Harrison. 1997. The search for evidence of effective health promotion. British Medical Journal 315:361-63.
24. Stacey, R., and J. Spencer. 2000. Assessing the evidence in qualitative medical education research. Medical Education 34 (7): 498-500.
25. Taylor, R., B. Reeves, P. Ewings, S. Binns, J. Keast, and R. Mears. 2000. A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians. Medical Education 34:120-25.
26. Taylor, R., B. Reeves, P. Ewings, R. Mears, S. Binns, J. Keast, and J. Hartland. 1999. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills workshops for health service decision-makers in the South and Western Region. Unpublished report.
27. Wolff, N. 2001. Randomised trials of socially complex interventions: Promise or peril? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2:123-26.