Covariate adjustment in family-based association studies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 244-255

  Whittemore, Alice S ^a   Halpern, Jerry ^a   Ahsan, Habibul ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Confounding; Covariate adjustment; Efficient score statistic; Genetic association; Transmission distortion; Transmission disequilibrium test

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; FAMILY HISTORY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROGENY;

ALLELES; AROMATASE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUCLEAR FAMILY;

EID: 15544378432     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20055     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahsan H, Whittemore AS, Chen Y, Senie RT, Hamilton SP, Wang Q, Gurvich I, Santella RM. 2005. Variants in estrogen-biosynthesis genes CYP17 and CYP19 and breast cancer risk: a family-based genetic association study. Breast Cancer Res 7:R71-R81.
2. Clayton D. 1999. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test to uncertain-haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet 65:1170-1177.
3. Dunning AM, Healey CS, Pharoah PD, Teare MD, Ponder BA, Easton DF. 1999. A systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:843-854.
4. Eaves IA, Bennett ST, Forster P, Ferber KM, Ehrmann D, Wilson AJ, Bhattacharyya S, Ziegler AG, Brinkmann B, Todd JA. 1999. Transmission ratio distortion at the INS-IGF2 VNTR. Nat Genet 22:324-325.
5. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. 1987. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 51:227-233.
6. Feigelson HS, McKean-Cowdin R, Pike MC, Coetzee GA, Kolonel LN, Nomura AM, Le Marchand L, Henderson BE. 1999. Cytochrome P450c17alpha gene (CYP17) polymorphism predicts use of hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Res 59:3908-3910.
7. Field LL, Fothergill-Payne C, Bertrams J, Baur MP. 1986. HLA-DR effects in a large German IDDM dataset. Genet Epidemiol [Suppl] 1:323-328.
8. Hogg RV, Craig AT. 1971. Introduction to mathematical statistics (third edition). New York: MacMillan Co.
9. Horvath S, Laird NM. 1998. A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data. Am J Hum Genet 63:1886-1897.
10. Kraft P, Thomas D. 2004. Case-sibling gene-association studies for diseases with variable age at onset. Stat Med 23:3697-3712.
11. Marchini J, Cardon LR, Phillips MS, Donnelly P. 2004. The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies. Nat Genet 36:512-517.
12. Rabinowitz D. 2002. Adjusting for population heterogeneity and mis-specified haplotype frequencies when testing nonparametric null hypotheses in statistical genetics. J Am Stat Assoc 97:742-751.
13. Rabinowitz D, Laird N. 2000. A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information. Hum Hered 50:211-223.
14. Robins JM, Smoller JW, Lunetta KL. 2001. On the validity of the TDT in the presence of comorbidity and ascertainment bias. Genet Epidemiol 21:326-336.
15. Schaid DJ, Rowland C. 1998. Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease. Am J Hum Genet 63:1492-1506.
16. Seer 1981. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: incidence and mortality data, 1973-77. NCI monograph 57, NIH publication no. 81-2330. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
17. Shih MC, Whittemore AS. 2002. Tests for genetic association using family data. Genet Epidemiol 22:128-145.
18. Slager SL, Schaid DJ. 2001. Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects. Am J Hum Genet 68:1457-1462.
19. Slager SL, Schaid DJ, Wang L, Thibodeau SN. 2003. Candidate-gene association studies with pedigree data: controlling for environmental covariates. Genet Epidemiol 24:273-283.
20. Smoller JW, Lunetta KL, Robins J. 2000. Implications of comorbidity and ascertainment bias for identifying disease genes. Am J Med Genet 96:817-822.
21. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506-516.
22. Terwilliger JD, Ott J. 1992. A haplotype-based "haplotype relative risk" approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 42:337-346.
23. Whittemore AS, Halpern J. 2003. Logistic regression of family data from retrospective study designs. Genet Epidemiol 25: 177-189.
24. Whittemore AS, Tu IP. 2000. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory. Am J Hum Genet 66:1328-1340.
25. Writing Group for Women's Health Initiative. 2002. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321-333.
26. Zollner S, Wen X, Hanchard NA, Herbert MA, Ober C, Pritchard JK. 2004. Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 74:62-72.