Welfare, performance and meat qualify of fattening pigs in alternative housing and management systems: A review

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 709-719

  Millet, Sam ^a   Moons, Christel P H ^a   Van Oeckel, Monique J ^b   Janssens, Geert P J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Ministry of the Flemish Community   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Alternative housing; Carcass quality; Growth; Meat quality; Pig; Welfare

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 15544374280     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2033     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Fraser D, The role of behaviour in swine production: a review of research. Appl Anim Ethol 11:317-339 (1984).
2. Windhorst HW, Global patterns of pork production and pork trade, in 2nd International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality. http://www.conferencia.uncnet. br/pork/pork.en.html (2001).
3. Ngapo TM, Dransfield E, Martin J-F, Magnusson M, Bredahl L and Nute GR, Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark. Meat Sci 66:125-134 (2004).
4. Cabaret J, Animal health problems in organic farming: subjective and objective assessments and farmers' actions. Livest Prod Sci 80:99-108 (2003).
5. Rushen J, Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:199-214 (2003).
6. Broom D, Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142:524-526 (1986).
7. Broom D, Psychological indicators of stress and welfare, in Ethics, Welfare, Law and Market Forces: the Veterinary Interface, ed by Michell AR and Ewbank R. UFAW, Wheatampstead, UK, pp 167-175 (1998).
8. Barnett JL and Hemsworth PH. The validity of physiological and behavioral measures of animal-welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 25:177-187 (1990).
9. Moberg GP and Mench JA, The Biology of Animal Stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. CAB International, Oxon, UK (2000).
10. Moberg GP, Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare, in The Biology of Animal Stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare, ed by Moberg GP and Mench JA. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp 1-21 (2000).
11. Broom D and Johnson KG, Stress and Animal Welfare, Chapman and Hall, London, UK (1993).
12. Ödberg FO, Abnormal behaviours: (stereotypies), Industrias Graficas España, Madrid (1978).
13. Wechsler B, Coping and coping strategies - a behavioral view. Appl Anim Behav Sci 43:123-134 (1995).
14. Rushen J, Stereotypies, agression and the feeding schedules of tethered sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 14:137-147 (2004).
15. Fraser D, Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Anim Welfare 12:433-443 (2003).
16. Arellano PE, Pijoan C, Jacobson LD and Algers B, Stereotyped behavior, social interactions and suckling pattern of pigs housed in groups or in single crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci 35:157-166 (1992).
17. Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, de Jong IC, Schrama JW, Cools AR and Wiegant VM, Responses to apomorphine of pigs with different coping characteristics. Psychopharmacology 152:24-30 (2000).
18. Gade PB, Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Sci 62:353-358 (2002).
19. Beattie VE, Walker N and Sneddon IA, An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 48:151 -158 (1996).
20. Johnson AK, Morrow-Tesch JL and McGlone JJ, Behavior and performance of lactating sows and piglets reared indoors or outdoors. J Anim Sci 79:2571-2579 (2001).
21. Gomez RS, Lewis AJ, Miller PS, Chen HY and Diedrichsen RM, Body composition and tissue accretion rates of barrows fed corn-soybean meal diets or low-protein, amino acid-supplemented diets at different feeding levels. J Anim Sci 80:654-662 (2002).
22. Day JEL, Kelly H, Martins A and Edwards SA, Towards a baseline assessment of organic pig welfare. Anim Welfare 12:637-641 (2003).
23. Hoffman LC, Styger E, Muller M and Brand TS, The growth and carcass and meat characteristics of pigs raised in a free-range or conventional housing system. S Afr J Anim Sci 33:166-175 (2003).
24. Muirhead MR and Alexander JL, Managing pig health and the treatment of disease, 5M Enterprises Ltd, Sheffield, UK (1997).
25. Guy JH, Rowlinson P, Chadwick JR and Ellis M, Health conditions of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems: implications for welfare. Livest Prod Sci 75:233-243 (2002).
26. Hansson I, Hamilton C, Ekman T and Forslund K, Carcass quality in certified organic production compared with conventional livestock production. J Veter Med Ser B, Infect Dis Veter Publ Health 47:111-120 (2000).
27. Vaarst M, Roepstorff A, Feenstra A, Hogedal P, Larsen VA, Lauritsen HB and Hermansen JE, Animal health and welfare aspects of organic pig production, 16-9-1999. Horsens, Denmark (1999).
28. Hyun Y, Ellis M and Johnson RW, Effects of feeder type, space allowance, and mixing on the growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 76:2771-2778 (1998).
29. Ekkel ED, Vandoorn CEA, Hessing MJC and Tielen MJM, The specific-stress-free housing system has positive effects on productivity, health, and welfare of pigs. J Anim Sci 73:1544-1551 (1995).
30. Friend TH, Knabe AD and Tanksley TD Jr, Behavior and performance of pigs grouped by three different methods at weaning. J Anim Sci 57:1406-1411 (1983).
31. Kritas SK and Morrison RB, An observational study on tail biting in commercial grower-finisher barns. J Swine Health Prod 12:17-22 (2004).
32. Arey DS and Edwards SA, Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest Prod Sci 56:61-70 (1998).
33. Erhard HW, Mendl M and Ashley DD, Individual aggressiveness of pigs can be measured and used to reduce aggression after mixing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 54:137-151 (1997).
34. Wemelsfelder F, Haskell M, Mendl MT, Calvert S and Lawrence AB, Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions. Anim Behav 60:385-394 (2000).
35. Weber R and Zárate AV, Welfare of fattening pigs in different husbandry systems, 21-8-2000. Wageningen, the Netherlands (2000).
36. Arey DS, The effect of bedding on the behavioural and welfare of pigs. Anim Welfare 2:235-246 (1993).
37. Beattie VE, Walker N and Sneddon IA, Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Anim Welfare 4:207-220 (1995).
38. Petersen V, Simonsen HB and Lawson LG, The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behavior in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 45:215-224 (1995).
39. Morgan CA, Deans LA, Lawrence AB and Nielsen BL, The effects of straw bedding on the feeding and social behaviour of growing pigs fed by means of single-space feeders. Appl Anim Behav Sci 58:23-33 (1998).
40. O'Connell NE and Beattie VE, Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim Welfare 8:269-279 (1999).
41. Klont RE, Hulsegge B, Hoving-Bolink AH, Gerritzen MA, Kurt E, Winkelman-Goedhart HA, de Jong IC and Kranen RW, Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. J Anim Sci 79:2835-2843 (2001).
42. Mouttotou N, Hatchell FM and Green LE, Foot lesions in finishing pigs and their associations with the type of floor. Veter Rec 144:629-632 (1999).
43. Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Blanton JR and Miller MF, Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition, and pork quality. J Anim Sci 80:1781-1790 (2002).
44. Hill JD, McGlone JJ, Fullwood SD and Miller MF, Environmental enrichment influences on pig behavior, performance and meat quality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 57:51-68 (1998).
45. Apple JK and Craig JV, The influence of pen size on toy preference of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 35:149-155 (1992).
46. Edge HL, Bornett HLI, Newton E and Edwards SA, Alternatives to nose-ringing in outdoor sows: 2. The provision of edible or inedible overground enrichment. Anim Welfare 13:233-237 (2004).
47. Petersen JS, Oksbjerg N, Jorgensen B and Sorensen MT, Growth performance, carcass composition and leg weakness in pigs exposed to different levels of physical activity. Anim Sci 66:725-732 (1998).
48. de Haer LCM and Devries AG, Feed-intake patterns of and feed digestibility in growing pigs housed individually or in groups. Livest Prod Sci 33:277-292 (1993).
49. Gomez RS, Lewis AJ, Miller PS and Chen HY, Growth performance and digestive and metabolic responses of gilts penned individually or in groups of four. J Anim Sci 78:597-603 (2000).
50. Warnants N, Van Oeckel MJ and De Paepe M, Bietenulp in vleesvarkensvoeders. Landbouw & Techniek 5:36-37 (2000).
51. Ferguson NS, Lavers G and Gous RM, The effect of stocking density on the responses of growing pigs to dietary lysine. Anim Sci 73:459-469 (2001).
52. Enfält AC, Lundstrom K, Hansson I, Karlsson A, Essengustavsson B and Hakansson J, Moderate indoor exercise - effect on production and carcass traits, muscle enzyme-activities and meat quality in pigs. Anim Prod 57:127-135 (1993).
53. Hale OM, Newton GL and Haydon KD, Effect of diet and exercise on performance, carcass traits and plasma components of growing-finishing barrows. J Anim Sci 62:665-671 (1986).
54. Lewis PK, Rakes LY, Brown CJ and Noland PR, Effect of exercise and pre-slaughter stress on pork muscle characteristics. Meat Sci 26:121-129 (1989).
55. Millet S, Hesta M, Seynaeve M, Ongenae E, De Smet S, Debraekeleer J and Janssens GPJ, Performance, meat and carcass traits of fattening pigs with organic versus conventional housing and nutrition. Livest Prod Sci 87:109-119 (2004).
56. Hicks TA, McGlone JJ, Whisnant CS, Kattesh HG and Norman RL, Behavioral, endocrine, immune, and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. J Anim Sci 76:474-483 (1998).
57. Randolph JH, Cromwell GL, Stahly TS and Kratzer DD, Effects of group-size and space allowance on performance and behavior of swine. J Anim Sci 53:922-927 (1981).
58. Hyun Y, Ellis M, Riskowski G and Johnson RW, Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors. J Anim Sci 76:721-727 (1998).
59. Arthur RD, Brumm MC, Christenson RK, Crenshaw JD, Curtis SE, Gonyou HC, Hines RH, Jesse GW, Johnston LJ, Jones HW, Liebbrandt VD, Libal GW, Mahan DC, Mayrose VB, Moser RL, Shurson GC, Thulin AJ, Zimmerman DR and Baumgardt BR, Space requirements of barrows and gilts penned together from 54 to 113 kilograms. J Anim Sci 71:1088-1091 (1993).
60. Lebret B, Massabie P, Granier R, Juin H, Mourot J and Chevillon P, Influence of outdoor rearing and indoor temperature on growth performance, carcass, adipose tissue and muscle traits in pigs, and on the technological and eating quality of dry-cured hams. Meat Sci 62:447-455 (2002).
61. van der Wal PG, Mateman G, Devries AW, Vonder GMA, Smulders FJM, Geesink GH and Engel B, Scharrel (free range) pigs - carcass composition, meat quality and taste-panel studies. Meat Sci 34:27-37 (1993).
62. Gandemer G, Pichou D, Bougennec B, Caritez JC, Berge P, Briand E and Legault C, Influence du système d'élevage et du genotype sur la composition chimique et les qualités organoleptiques du muscle Longissimus chez le porc. Journées de la recherche porcine en France 22:101-110 (1990).
63. Olsson V, Andersson K, Hansson I and Lundstrom K, Differences in meat quality between organically and conventionally produced pigs. Meat Sci 64:287-297 (2003).
64. Bridi A, Müller L and Ribeiro AR. Indoor vs outdoor-rearing of pigs, performance, carcass and meat quality. Proc 44th Int Congr Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST), 30 August 1998, Barcelona, Spain, pp 1056-1057 (1998).
65. Warriss PD, Kestin SC and Robinson JM, A note on the influence of rearing environment on meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci 9:271-279 (1983).
66. Beattie VE, Weatherup RN, Moss BW and Walker N, The effect of increasing carcass weight of finishing boars and gilts on joint composition and meat quality. Meat Sci 52:205-211 (1999).
67. Enfält AC, Lundstrom K, Hansson I, Lundeheim N and Nystrom PE, Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Sci 45:1-15 (1997).
68. Guy JH, Rowlinson P, Chadwick JP and Ellis M, Growth performance and carcass characteristics of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems. Anim Sci 74:493-502 (2002).
69. Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Blanton JR and Miller MF, Impact of spontaneous exercise on performance, meat quality, and muscle fiber characteristics of growing/finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 80:2833-2839 (2002).
70. Geor RJ, Mccutcheon LJ and Shen H, Muscular and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity short-term training. Equine Vet J Suppl 30:311-317 (1999).
71. Jorgensen PF and Hyldgaard-Jensen JF, The effect of physical training on skeletal muscle enzyme composition in pigs. Acta Vet Scand 16:368-378 (1975).
72. Warriss PD, Bevis EA and Ekins PJ, The relationship between glycogen stores and muscle ultimate pH in commercially slaughtered pigs. Br Veter J 145:378-383 (1989).
73. Fernandez X and Tornberg E, A review of the causes of variation in muscle glycogen content and utimate pH in pigs. J Muscle Foods 2:209-235 (1991).
74. Essėn-Gustavsson B, Lundstrom K, Larsson G, Lindholm A, Nordin AC, Hansson I and Thornberg E, The effect during growth of moderate exercise on muscle metabolic characteristics in vivo and relation to meat quality and sensory properties, Proc 34th Int Congr Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST), Brisbane (1988).
75. Enfält AC, Lundstrom K and Engstrand U, Early post-mortem pH decrease in porcine M-longissimus-dorsi of PSE, normal and DFD quality. Meat Sci 34:131-143 (1993).
76. Millet S, Cox E, Buyse J, Goddeeris BM and Janssens GPJ, Immunocompetence of fattening pigs fed organic versus conventional diets in organic versus conventional housing. Veter J (in press). DOI: 10.1016/j.tvj1.2004.03.012.
77. Lambooij E, Hulsegge B, Klont RE, Winkelman-Goedhart HA, Reimert HGM and Kranen RW, Effects of housing conditions of slaughter pigs on some post mortem muscle metabolites and pork quality characteristics. Meat Sci 66:855-862 (2004).
78. Petersen JS, Henckel P, Maribo H, Oksbjerg N and Sorensen MT, Muscle metabolic traits, post mortem pH-decline and meat quality in pigs subjected to regular physical training and spontaneous activity. Meat Sci 46:259-275 (1997).
79. Geverink NA, de Jong IC, Lambooij E, Blokhuis HJ and Wiegant VM, Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Canad J Anim Sci 79:285-291 (1999).
80. Rosenvold K, Petersen JS, Laerke HN, Jensen SK, Therkildsen M, Karlsson AH, Moller HS and Andersen HJ, Muscle glycogen stores and meat quality as affected by strategic finishing feeding of slaughter pigs. J Anim Sci 79:382-391 (2001).
81. Van Oeckel MJ, Warnants N and Boucque CV, Measurement and prediction of pork colour. Meat Sci 52:347-354 (1999).
82. Lindahl G, Lundstrom K and Tornberg E, Contribution of pigment content, myoglobin forms and internal reflectance to the colour of pork loin and ham from pure breed pigs. Meat Sci 59:141-151 (2001).
83. Lefaucheur L, Myofiber typing and pig meat production. Slov Vet Res 38:5-33 (2004).
84. Henckel P, Oksbjerg N, Erlandsen E, Barton-Gade P and Bejerholm C, Histo- and biochemical characteristics of the Longissimus dorsi muscle in pigs and their relationships to performance and meat quality. Meat Sci 47:311-321 (1997).
85. Hodgeson DR and Rose R, The athletic horse, WB Saunders Company, Philadephia (1994).
86. Marlin D and Nankervis K, Equine exercise physiology, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK (2002).
87. Petersen JS, Henckel P, Oksbjerg N and Sorensen MT, Adaptations in muscle fibre characteristics induced by physical activity in pigs. Anim Sci 66:733-740 (1998).
88. Hodgson RR, Davis GW, Smith GC, Savell JW and Cross HR, Relationships between pork loin palatability traits and physical characteristics of cooked chops. J Anim Sci 69:4858-4865 (1991).
89. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J and Lebret B, Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat - 1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci 53:59-65 (1999).
90. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J and Lebret B, Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat - 2. Consumer acceptability of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci 53:67-72 (1999).
91. Sundrum A, Butfering L, Henning M and Hoppenbrock KH, Effects of on-farm diets for organic pig production on performance and carcass quality. J Anim Sci 78:1199-1205 (2000).
92. Beattie VE, O'Connell NE and Moss BW, Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest Prod Sci 65:71-79 (2000).
93. Day JEL, Spoolder HAM, Burfoot A, Chamberlain HL and Edwards SA, The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 75:177-192 (2002).
94. de Jong IC, Prelle IT, van de Burgwal JA, Lambooji E, Korte SM, Blokhuis HJ and Koolhaas JM, Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs. Physiol Behav 68:571-578 (2000).
95. Guy JH, Rowlinson P, Chadwick JP and Ellis A, Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci 75:193-206 (2002).
96. Pearce GP, Paterson AM and Pearce AN, The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behavior of male pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 23:27-37 (1989).
97. Wolter BF, Ellis M, Curtis SE, Augspurger NR, Hamilton DN, Parr EN and Webel DM, Effect of group size on pig performance in a wean-to-finish production system. J Anim Sci 79:1067-1073 (2001).