Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle

Chromosoma

Volumn 113, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 440-446

  Paliulis, Leocadia V ^a   Nicklas, R Bruce ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SEPARATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GRASSHOPPER; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MEIOSIS; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MICROMANIPULATION; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PHASE TRANSITION; SISTER CHROMATID;

ANIMALS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GRASSHOPPERS; KINETOCHORES; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICROSCOPY, PHASE-CONTRAST; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; SPERMATOCYTES;

EID: 15444363499     PISSN: 00095915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-005-0330-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Clyne RK, Katis VL, Jessop L, Benjamin KR, Herskowitz I, Lichten M, Nasmyth K (2003) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol 5:480-485 10.1038/ncb977
2. Goldstein LS (1981) Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. melanogaster. Cell 25:591-602 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90167-7
3. Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA (1993) Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol 122:1311-1321 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1311
4. Heneen WK (1975) Ultrastructure of the prophase kinetochore in cultured cells of rat-kangaroo (Potorous tridactylis). Hereditas 7:209-220
5. Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Birnby D, Orr-Weaver TL (1992) The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 130:827-841 1:STN:280:By2B2MfmvFE%3D
6. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y (2004) The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 427:510-517 10.1038/nature02312
7. Lee BH, Amon A (2003) Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Dev Cell 4:711-726 10.1016/ S1534-5807(03)00130-8
8. Lee JY, Orr-Weaver TL (2001) The molecular basis of sister-chromatid cohesion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17:753-777 10.1146/ annurev.cellbio.17.1.753
9. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H, Dias JM, Lopes C, Amorim I, Antunes-Martins A, Sunkel CE (2004) Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells. J Cell Sci 117:1757-1771 10.1242/jcs.01033
10. Luykx P (1965) Kinetochore-to-pole connections during prometaphase of the meiotic divisions in Urechis eggs. Exp Cell Res 39:658-668 10.1016/ 0014-4827(65)90069-8
11. Moore DP, Orr-Weaver TL (1998) Chromosome segregation during meiosis: building an unambivalent bivalent. Curr Top Dev Biol 37:263-299
12. Muller W (1972) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zum Formwechsel der Kinetochoren wahrend der Spermatocytenteilungen von Pales ferruginea (Nematocera). Chromosoma 38:139-172 10.1007/BF00326191
13. Nicklas RB, Kubai DF (1985) Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation. Chromosoma 92:313-324 10.1007/BF00329815
14. Nicklas RB, Ward SC (1994) Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol 126:1241-1253 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241
15. Nicklas RB, Kubai DF, Hays TS (1982) Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase. J Cell Biol 95:91-104 10.1083/jcb.95.1.91
16. Nicklas RB, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ (1995) Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J Cell Biol 130:929-939 10.1083/jcb.130.4.929
17. Paliulis LV, Nicklas RB (2000) The reduction of chromosome number in meiosis is determined by properties built into the chromosomes. J Cell Biol 150:1223-1232 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1223
18. Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K (2003) Un menage a quatre: The molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112:423-440 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00083-7
19. Rabitsch K, Gregan J, Schleiffer A, Javerzat JP, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K (2004) Two fission yeast homologs of Drosophila Mei-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II. Curr Biol 14:287-301 10.1016/S0960-9822(04)00063-6
20. Rufas JS, Mazella C, Suja JA, De La Vega CG (1989) Kinetochore structures are duplicated prior to the first meiotic metaphase - a model of meiotic behavior of kinetochores in grasshoppers. Eur J Cell Biol 48:220-226
21. Suja JA, Rufas JS (1994) The telochore: A telomeric differentiation of the chromosome axis. Chromosome Res 2:361-368
22. Suzuki T, Tanaka I (1999) Attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules during meiosis I of Lilium microsporocytes. Chromosome Res 7:121-129
23. Toth A, Rabitsch KP, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Buonomo SB, Nasmyth K (2000) Functional genomics identifies monopolin: A kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs in meiosis I. Curr Biol 11:1001-1009
24. Watanabe Y, Nurse P (1999) Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 400:461-464 10.1038/22774
25. Yokobayashi S, Yamamoto M, Watanabe Y (2003) Cohesins determine the attachment manner of kinetochores to spindle microtubules at meiosis I in fission yeast. Science 300:1152-1155 10.1126/science.1083634
26. Zeng X, Saunders WS (2000) Slk19p is a centromere protein that functions to stabilize mitotic spindles. Genetics 155:577-587 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXkslyqtLs%3D