Science is not enough: How do we increase implementation?

Animal Welfare

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Appleby, M C ^a  

^a Humane Society of the United States   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Economics; Ethics; Politics; Science; Sociology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CARE; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CAGE; CONSUMER; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; NONHUMAN; POLITICS; SCIENCE; SOCIOLOGY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1542790606     PISSN: 09627286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albentosa M J and Cooper J J 2002 Effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour, perch use and distribution of laying hens in furnished cages. In: Proceedings of the World Poultry Science Association, United Kingdom Branch Spring Meeting pp 36-37. World Poultry Science Association: York, UK
2. Anonymous 2003 Producers address issues related to treatment of chickens. Jefferson City News Tribune January 27
3. Appleby M C 1999 Tower of Babel: Variation in ethical approaches, concepts of welfare and attitudes to genetic manipulation. Animal Welfare 8: 381-390
4. Appleby M C What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behaviour, with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Animal Welfare: In press
5. Appleby M C, Cutler N, Gazzard J, Goddard P, Milne J A, Morgan C and Redfern A 2003 What price cheap food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 395-408
6. Bennett R M 1997 Economics. In: Appleby M C and Hughes B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 235-248. CAB International: Wallingford, UK
7. Commission of the European Communities 1999 Council Directive 1999/74/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities L203: 53-57
8. England C 2002 Burger King and animal welfare: Why did this company get involved? In: Proceedings of the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science and the Alberta Farm Animal Care Conference p 13. Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science: Edmonton, Canada
9. Eurogroup for Animal Welfare 2002 Annual Report: Animal Protection Through Legislation. Eurogroup for Animal Welfare: Brussels, Belgium
10. European Communities 2000 European Communities Proposal: Animal Welfare and Trade in Agriculture. WTO Committee on Agriculture, Special Session, Paper G/AG/NG/W/19. Available at www.wto.org (follow links Trade Topics/Goods/Agriculture/Agriculture negotiations).
11. Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens. Farm Animal Welfare Council: Tolworth, UK
12. Farm Animal Welfare Council 1998 Report on the Implications of Cloning on the Welfare of Livestock. Farm Animal Welfare Council: Tolworth, UK
13. Food and Drug Administration 2002 Centre for veterinary medicine to cosponsor public symposium on livestock cloning. Available at www.fda.gov/cvm/index/fdavet/2002/JulyAugust.pdf
14. Fraser D 1995 Science, values and animal welfare: Exploring the 'inextricable connection'. Animal Welfare 4: 103-117
15. Haartsen P T and Elson H A 1989 Economics of alternative housing systems. In: Kuit A R, Ehlhardt D A and Blokhuis H J (eds) Alternative Improved Housing Systems for Poultry pp 143-150. Commission of the European Communities: Luxembourg
16. Hollingsworth J 2002 Impact and importance of standards: FMINCCR Animal Welfare Program. In: Reynnells R and Blake J (eds) Standards for Food Animal Production: Status, Well-being and Social Responsibility pp 4-9. Future Trends in Animal Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA
17. Jorêt A D 1998 Walking the animal welfare tight-rope - an egg industry view. In: British Society for Animal Science (ed) Farm Animal Welfare: Who Writes the Rules? Programme and Summaries p 2. British Society for Animal Science: Edinburgh, UK
18. Kestin S C, Knowles T G, Tinch A E and Gregory N G 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship to genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190-194
19. Lysgaard T 1994 Economic and political considerations of keeping laying hens in Europe and in the EU: The Danish case. In: Future Egg Production in Sweden pp 73-83. Krönagg: Kungsängen, Sweden
20. McInerney J P 1998 The economics of welfare. In: Michell A R and Ewbank R (eds) Ethics, Welfare, Law and Market Forces: The Veterinary Interface pp 115-132. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Herts, UK
21. Mitol J 2002 Got cloned milk? Company ready to sell milk of cloned cows but is the public ready to buy? Available at abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DailyNews/clonedmilk_010716.html
22. Nakajima S, Arimitsu K and Lattal K M 2002 Estimation of animal intelligence by university students in Japan and the United States. Anthrozoös 15: 194-205
23. Polley C R, Craig J V and Bhagwat A L 1974 Crowding and agonistic behavior: A curvilinear relationship. Poultry Science 53: 1621-1623
24. Sandøe P, Christiansen S B and Appleby M C 2003 Farm animal welfare: The interaction of ethical questions and animal welfare science. Animal Welfare 12: 469-478
25. Sandøe P, Crisp R and Holtug N 1997 Ethics. In: Appleby M C and Hughes B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 3-17. CAB International: Wallingford, UK
26. Scientific Veterinary Committee 1996 Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General for Agriculture: Brussels, Belgium
27. Sørensen P 1989 Broiler selection and welfare. In: Faure J M and Mills A D (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare pp 45-58. World's Poultry Science Association: Tours, France
28. Swiss Society for the Protection of Animals 1994 Laying Hens: Twelve Years of Experience with New Husbandry Systems in Switzerland. Swiss Society for the Protection of Animals: Basel, Switzerland
29. United Egg Producers 2002 Animal Husbandry Guidelines for US Egg Laying Flocks. United Egg Producers: Alpharetta, Georgia, USA
30. Williams H T 1960 Principles for British Agricultural Policy: a Study Sponsored by the Nuffield Foundation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK